Rural renewal of China in the context of rural-urban integration: Governance fit and performance differences

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2018, Pages

  Wang, Rongyu ^a   Tan, Rong ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

China; Governance structure; Institutional analysis; Rural renewal; Rural urban integration

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; INTEGRATED APPROACH; NATIONAL STRATEGY; RENEWAL POLICY; RURAL DEVELOPMENT; RURAL ECONOMY; RURAL-URBAN COMPARISON;

CHINA;

EID: 85041618734     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su10020393     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Fang, B.; Wu, C.; Yang, L. The case study of rural residential area consolidation and discussion on its development path. J. Anhui Agric. Sci. 2007, 35, 799–800. (In Chinese)
2. Chen, X. Agriculture and rural development: Current situation and problems. J. Nanjing Agric. Univ. 2013, 13, 1–10. (In Chinese)
3. The 16th CCCPC. The Bulletin of the 5th Plenary Session of the 16th CCCPC. 2005. Available online: http://cpc.people.com.cn/GB/64162/134580/141447/ (accessed on 8 January 2018). (In Chinese)
4. The 17th CCCPC. The Bulletin of the 17th National Congress of the Communist Party of China. 2007. Available online: http://news.xinhuanet.com/newscenter/2007-10/24/content_6938568.htm(accessed on 8 January 2018). (In Chinese)
5. The 18th CCCPC. The Bulletin of the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China. 2012. Available online: http://news.china.com.cn/politics/2012-11/20/content_27165856.htm (accessed on 8 January 2018). (In Chinese)
6. The 18th CCCPC. Decision of the CCCPC on Some Major Issues Concerning Comprehensively Deepening the Reform. 2013. Available online: http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2013-11/15/c_118164235.htm (accessed on 8 January 2018). (In Chinese)
7. The 19th CCCPC. The Bulletin of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China. 2017. Available online: http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/19cpcnc/2017-10/27/c_1121867529.htm (accessed on 25 January 2018). (In Chinese)
8. Lotto, R.D.; Cattaneo, T.; Giorgi, E.; Venco, E.M. Coherences and Differences among EU, US and PRC Approaches for Rural Urban Development: Interscalar and Interdisciplinary Analysis. Sustainability 2017, 9, 537. [CrossRef]
9. Hao, P.; Sliuzas, R.; Geertman, S. The development and redevelopment of urban villages in Shenzhen. Habitat Int. 2011, 35, 214–224. [CrossRef]
10. Long, H.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Woods, M.; Zou, J. Accelerated restructuring in rural China fueled by “increasing vs. Decreasing balance” land-use policy for dealing with hollowed villages. Land Use Policy 2012, 29, 11–22. [CrossRef]
11. Wang, Q.; Zhang, M.; Cheong, K.C. Stakeholder perspectives of China's land consolidation program: A case study of Dongnan Village, Shandong Province. Habitat Int. 2014, 43, 172–180. [CrossRef]
12. Jiang, S.; Liu, S. Capitalization of land and rural industrialization—A case study of Nanhai city. China Econ. Q. 2004, 4, 211–228. (In Chinese)
13. Chen, A.; Gao, J. Urbanization in China and the coordinated development model—The case of Chengdu. Soc. Sci. J. 2011, 48, 500–513. [CrossRef]
14. Li, L.H.; Lin, J.; Li, X.; Wu, F. Redevelopment of urban village in China—A step towards an effective urban policy? A case study of Liede Village in Guangzhou. Habitat Int. 2014, 43, 299–308. [CrossRef]
15. Hin, L.L.; Xin, L. Redevelopment of urban villages in Shenzhen, China—An analysis of power relations and urban coalitions. Habitat Int. 2011, 35, 426–434. [CrossRef]
16. Zhou, Z. Towards collaborative approach? Investigating the regeneration of urban village in Guangzhou, China. Habitat Int. 2014, 44, 297–305. [CrossRef]
17. Lin, Y.; de Mmeulder, B.; Wang, S. Understanding the “village in the city” in Guangzhou. Urban Stud. 2011, 48, 3583–3598. [CrossRef]
18. Wu, F.; Zhang, F.; Webster, C. Informality and the development and demolition of urban villages in the Chinese peri-urban area. Urban Stud. 2013, 50, 1919–1934. [CrossRef]
19. Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Long, H.; Cui, W. Community-based rural residential land consolidation and allocation can help to revitalize hollowed villages in traditional agricultural areas of China: Evidence from Dancheng County, Henan Province. Land Use Policy 2014, 39, 188–198. [CrossRef]
20. Long, H. Land consolidation: An indispensable way of spatial restructuring in rural China. J. Geogr. Sci. 2014, 24, 211–225. [CrossRef]
21. Wang, Y.; Guo, X.; Liu, H. Synthetic evaluation of new socialist countryside construction at county level in China. China Agric. Econ. Rev. 2011, 3, 383–401. [CrossRef]
22. Hagedorn, K. Particular requirements for institutional analysis in nature-related sectors. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2008, 35, 357–384. [CrossRef]
23. Thiel, A.; Schleyer, C.; Hinkel, J.; Schlüter, M.; Hagedorn, K.; Bisaro, S.; Bobojonov, I.; Hamidov, A. Transferring williamson's discriminating alignment to the analysis of environmental governance of social-ecological interdependence. Ecol. Econ. 2016, 128, 159–168. [CrossRef]
24. Williamson, O.E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism; The Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1985.
25. Hagedorn, K.; Arzt, K.; Peters, U. Institutional arrangements for environmental co-operatives: A conceptual framework. In Environmental Co-Operation and Institutional Change: Theories and Policies for European Agriculture; Hagedorn, K., Ed.; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 2002.
26. Hagedorn, K. Can the concept of integrative and segregative institutions contribute to the framing of institutions of sustainability? Sustainability 2015, 7, 584–611. [CrossRef]
27. Ostrom, E. Understanding Institutional Diversity; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2005.
28. Ostrom, E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 2009, 325, 419–422. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29. Williamson, O.E. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Adm. Sci. Q. 1991, 36, 269–296. [CrossRef]
30. Williamson, O.E. The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. J. Econ. Lit. 2000, 38, 595–613. [CrossRef]
31. Alexander, E.R. A transaction-cost theory of land use planning and development control: Toward the institutional analysis of public planning. Town Plan. Rev. 2001, 72, 45–75. [CrossRef]
32. Olson, M. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1965.
33. Ostrom, E. Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Am. Econ. Rev. 2010, 100, 641–672. [CrossRef]
34. Buitelaar, E. A transaction-cost analysis of the land development process. Urban Stud. 2004, 41, 2539–2553. [CrossRef]
35. Furubotn, E.G.; Richter, R. Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics; University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2005.
36. Ménard, C. The economics of hybrid organizations. J. Inst. Theor. Econ. 2004, 160, 345–376. [CrossRef]
37. Hayek, F.A. The use of knowledge in society. Am. Econ. Rev. 1945, 35, 519–530.
38. Gerring, J. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2007.
39. Vatn, A. Institutions and the Environment; Edward Elgar Publishing Limited: Northampton, UK, 2005.
40. Tan, R.; Beckmann, V. Diversity of practical quota systems for farmland preservation: A multi-country comparison and analysis. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 2010, 28, 211–224. [CrossRef]
41. Tan, R.; Wang, R.; Sedlin, T. Land-development offset policies in the quest for sustainability: What can China learn from Germany? Sustainability 2014, 6, 3400–3430. [CrossRef]
42. Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons—The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1990.
43. Xu, Y. Reinstating autonomy: An exploration into the effective forms for realizing villager autonomy. J. Chin. Gov. 2016, 1, 157–173. [CrossRef]
44. Zhang, L.; Wang, S.X.; Yu, L. Is social capital eroded by the state-led urbanization in China? A case study on indigenous villagers in the urban fringe of Beijing. China Econ. Rev. 2015, 35, 232–246. [CrossRef]
45. Gu, X.; Dai, B.; Chen, B. Landscape effects of land consolidation projects in Central China—A case study of Tianmen City, Hubei Province. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 2008, 18, 41–46. [CrossRef]