The influence of political ideology and trust on willingness to vaccinate

PLoS ONE

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Baumgaertner, Bert ^a   Carlisle, Juliet E ^a   Justwan, Florian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFLUENZA VACCINE; MEASLES VACCINE; PERTUSSIS VACCINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG CHOICE; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH BELIEF; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; IDEOLOGY; INFLUENZA; INTERNET; MEASLES; PARENTAL ATTITUDE; PERTUSSIS; POLITICS; TRUST; UNITED STATES; VACCINATION; ADOLESCENT; AGED; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PSYCHOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; POLITICS; TRUST; VACCINATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85041091124     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191728     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Sealander J. The failed century of the child: Governing America's young in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
2. Phadke VK, Bednarczyk RA, Salmon DA, Omer SB. Association between vaccine refusal and vaccinepreventable diseases in the United States. JAMA. 2016; 315: 1149. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016. 1353 PMID: 26978210
3. Elam-Evans LD, Yankey D, Singleton JA, Kolasa M. National, state, and selected local area vaccination coverage among children aged 19-35 months-United States, 2013. In: Mobidity and mortality weekly report [Internet]. 2014. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6334a1.htm
4. Fine P, Eames K, Heymann DL. Herd immunity: A rough guide. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 52: 911-916. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir007 PMID: 21427399
5. States with religious and philosophical exemptions from school immunization requirements [Internet]. 2016 [cited 8 Sep 2017]. Available: http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/school-immunizationexemption-state-laws.aspx
6. Bolton P, Holt E, Ross A, Hughart N. Estimating vaccination coverage using parental recall, vaccination cards, and medical records. Public Heal Rep. 1988; 113: 521-6.
7. Wooten KG, Luman LT, Barker LE. Socioeconomic factors and persistent racial disparities in childhood vaccination. Am J Health Behav. 2007; 31: 434-445. https://doi.org/10.5555/ajhb.2007.31.4.434 PMID: 17511578
8. Shawn D, Gold R. Survey of parents' attitudes to the recommended Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine program. CMAJ. 1987; 136: 1038-1040. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi? cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list-uids=3497703 PMID: 3494496
9. Salmon DA, Moulton LH, Omer SB, DeHart MP, Stokley S, Halsey NA. Factors associated with refusal of childhood vaccines among parents of school-aged children: A case-control study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005; 159: 470-476. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.159.5.470 PMID: 15867122
10. Smith P, Chu S, Barker L. Children who have received no vaccines: who are they and where do they live? Ped. 2004; 114: 187-795.
11. Wessel L. Vaccine myths. Science (80-). 2017; 356. Available: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/356/6336/368.summary
12. Possible side-effects from vaccines [Internet]. 2017 [cited 8 Sep 2017]. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/side-effects.htm
13. Peckham C, Bedford H, Senturia Y, Ades A. The Peckham report: National immunisation study: Factors affecting immunisation in childhood. Horsham; 1989.
14. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (80-). 1974; 185: 1124-1131. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1738360
15. Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, Read S, Combs B. How Safe is Safe Enough: A psychomeric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sci. 1978; 9: 127-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143739
16. Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S. Labile Werte: Ein schwieriges Problem fur die. 1983.
17. Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Facts versus fears: Understanding perceived risk. In: Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A, editors. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982. pp. 463-489.
18. Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Behavioral decision theory perspectives on risk and safety. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1984; 56: 183-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(84)90018-0
19. Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S. Behavioural decision theory on risk and safety. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1985; 56: 183-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(84)90018-0
20. Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science (80-). 1987; 236: 280-285.
21. Starr C. Social benefit versus technological risk. Science (80-). American Association for the Advancement of Science; 1969; 165: 1232-1238. https://doi.org/10.2307/1727970
22. Zinn J, Taylor-Gooby P. Risk as an interdisciplinary research area. In: Taylor-Gooby P, Zinn J, editors. Risk in social science. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 31.
23. DubeE, Laberge C, Guay M, Bramadat P, Roy R, Bettinger J. Vaccine hesitancy: An overview. Hum Vaccines Immunother. 2013; 9: 1763-1773. https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.24657 PMID: 23584253
24. Timmermans DRM, Henneman L, Hirasing RA, van der Wal G. Attitudes and risk perception of parents of different ethnic backgrounds regarding meningococcal C vaccination. Vaccine. 2005; 23: 3329-3335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.075 PMID: 15837239
25. Douglas M. Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. New York: Praeger; 1966.
26. Douglas M. Natural symbols: Explorations in cosmology. London: Barrie and Rockliff, The Cresset Press; 1970.
27. Douglas M, Wildavsky A. Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1982.
28. Ellis RJ, Thompson F. Culture and the Environment in the Pacific Northwest. Am Polit Sci Rev. 1997; 91: 885-897.
29. O'Connor R, Bord RJ, Fisher A. Rating threat mitigators: Faith in experts, governments, and individuals themselves to create a safer world. Risk Anal. 1998; 18: 547-556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924. 1998.tb00368.x PMID: 9853391
30. Peters E, Slovic P. The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1996; 26: 1427-1453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb00079.x
31. Langford IH, Georgiou S, Bateman IJ, Day RJ, Turner RK. Public perceptions of health risks from polluted coastal bathing waters: A mixed methodological analysis using cultural theory. Risk Anal. 2000; 20: 691-704. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.205062 PMID: 11110215
32. Jenkins-Smith H. Modeling stigma: An empirical analysis of nuclear waste images of Nevada. In: Flynn J, Slovic P, Kunreuther H, editors. Risk, media, and stigma: Understanding public challenges to modern science and technology. London; Sterling, VA: Earthscan; 2001. pp. 107-132.
33. Erikson RS, Tedin LK. American public opinion. New York: Longman; 2003.
34. Michaud K, Carlisle J, Smith E. The relationship between cultural values and political ideology, and the role of political knowledge. Polit Psychol. Wiley Online Library; 2009; 30: 27-42. Available: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00679.x
35. Evans G, Heath A, Lalljee M. Measuring left-right and libertarian-authoritarian values in the British electorate. Br J Sociol. 1996; 47: 93. https://doi.org/10.2307/591118
36. Federico CM, Sidanius J. Sophistication and the antecedents of whites' racial policy attitudes. Public Opin Q. 2002; 66: 145-176. https://doi.org/10.1086/339848
37. Feldman S. Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion: the Role of Core Beliefs and Values. Am J Pol Sci. Midwest Political Science Association; 1988; 32: 416. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111130
38. Feldman S. Values, ideology, and structure of political attitudes. In: Sears DO, Huddy L, Jervis R, editors. Oxford handbook of political psychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003. pp. 477-508.
39. Jost JT. The end of the end of ideology. Am Psychol. 2006; 61: 651-670. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651 PMID: 17032067
40. Kerlinger F. Liberalism and conservatism: The nature and structure of social attitudes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1984.
41. Peffley MA, Hurwitz J. A hierarchical model of attitude constraint. Am J Pol Sci. 1985; 29: 871. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111185
42. Rokeach M. The nature of human values. New York: Free Press; 1973.
43. Sidanius J, Pratto F. Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hiearchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
44. Altemeyer R. The authoritarian specter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1996.
45. Jost JT, Glaser J, Kruglanski AW, Sulloway FJ. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychol Bull. 2003; 129: 339-375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 PMID: 12784934
46. Oxley DR, Smith KB, Alford JR, HibbingM V., Miller JL, Scalora M, et al. Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science (80-). 2008; 321. Available: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/321/5896/1667
47. Rothman S, Lichter SR. Elite ideology and risk perception in nuclear energy policy. Am Polit Sci Rev. 1987; 81: 383-404. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961958
48. Wildavsky A, Dake K. Theories of risk perception: Who fears what and why? Daedalus. 1990; 119: 41-60. https://doi.org/10.2307/20025337
49. Duckitt J, Sibley CG. Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. Eur J Pers. 2007; 21: 113-130. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.614
50. Duckitt J, Sibley CG. A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice. Psychol Inq. 2009; 20: 98-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028540
51. Choma BL, Hanoch Y, Hodson G, Gummerum M. Risk propensity among liberals and conservatives: The effect of risk perception, expected benefits, and risk domain. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2014; 5: 713-721. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613519682
52. Lupton R, Hare C. Conservatives are more likely to believe that vaccines cause autism-The Washington Post. In: The Washington Post [Internet]. 2015 [cited 31 Jul 2017]. Available: https://www . washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2015/03/01/conservatives-are-more-likely-to-believethat-vaccines-cause-autism/?utm-term=.47225ed9610b
53. Miller ME. The GOP's dangerous debate on vaccines and autism. In: The Washington Post [Internet]. 2015 [cited 8 Sep 2017]. Available: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/09/17/the-gops-dangerous-debate-on-vaccines-and-autism/?utm-term=.9b313b2ed889
54. Brown B. Trump Twitter Archive: Vaccines [Internet]. [cited 31 Jul 2017]. Available: http://www. trumptwitterarchive.com/highlights/vaccines
55. Brown B. Trump Twitter Archive [Internet]. [cited 31 Jul 2017]. Available: http://www. trumptwitterarchive.com/archive
56. Kupferschmidt K. The science of persuasion. Science (80-). 2017; 356. Available: http://science. sciencemag.org/content/356/6336/366.summary
57. Hamilton LC, Hartter J, Saito K. Trust in scientists on climate change and vaccines. SAGE Open. 2015; 5: 2158244015602752-. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015602752
58. Mooney. The Republican brain: The science of why they deny science-and reality. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2012.
59. Blank JM, Shaw D. Does partisanship shape attitudes toward science and public policy? The case for ideology and religion. Suhay E, Druckman JN, editors. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2015; 658: 18-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214554756
60. Colgrove J. The ethics and politics of compulsory HPV vaccination. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 2389-2391. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp068248 PMID: 17151362
61. Rabinowitz M, Latella L, Stern C, Jost JT. Beliefs about childhood vaccination in the United States: Political ideology, false consensus, and the illusion of uniqueness. PLoS One. 2016; 11: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158382 PMID: 27391965
62. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model A Multidiscip J. 1999; 6: 1-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118