Parallel litigation and foreign investment dispute settlement

ICSID Review

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 381-426

  Cuniberti, Gilles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS EST CRÉTEIL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85041062227     PISSN: 02583690     EISSN: 20491999     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icsidreview/21.2.381     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Swiss Federal Court, Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas S.A. v. Colon Container Terminal S.A., BGE 127 III 279 (2001)
2. C. Oetiker, The Principle of Lis Pendens in International Arbitration: the Swiss Decision in Fomento v. Colon, 18 Arb. Int'l. 137 (2002)
3. C. Soderlund, Lis Pendens, Res Judicata and the Issue of Parallel Judicial Proceedings, 22 J. Int. Arb. 301, 309 (2005)
4. Fouchard, Gaillard and Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration 407 (1999)
5. L. Collins et al., Dicey and Morris on the Confl ict of Laws, 12th ed., 2000 (hereinafter Dicey & Morris), no. 12-060
6. R. Bergsieker, International Tribunals and Forum Non Conveniens Analysis, 114 Yale L.J. 443, 444 (2005)
7. B. Hanotiau, Problems raised by Complex Arbitrations Involving Multiple Contracts-Parties-Issues. An Analysis, 18 J. Int. Arb. 251 (2001)
8. A. Reinisch, The Use and Limits of Res Judicata and Lis Pendens as Procedural Tools to Avoid Confl icting Dispute Settlement Outcomes, 3 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 37, 48 (2004)
9. H.L. Buxbaum, Forum Selection in International Contract Litigation: the Role of Judicial Discretion, 12 Willamette J. Int'l L. & Disp. Resol. 185 (2004)
10. G.A. Bermann, Transnational Litigation 93 (2003)
11. L.E. Teitz, Both Sides of the Coin: A Decade of Parallel Proceedings and Enforcement of Foreign Judgements in Transnational Litigation, 10 Roger Williams U.L. Rev. 1, 9 (2004)
12. A. Briggs and P. Rees,Civil Jurisdiction and Judgements, no. 2-213 (2002)
13. H. Gaudemet Tallon, Les régimes relatifs au refus d'exercer la compétence juridictionnelle en matière civile et commerciale: Forum non conveniens, Lis Pendens, Rev. Int'l Dr. Comp. 423 (1994)
14. R. Cover, The Uses of Jurisdictional Redundancy: Interest, Ideology and Innovation, 22 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 639 (1981)
15. C. Schreuer, Non Pecuniary Remedies in ICSID Arbitration, 20 Arb. Int'l 325 (2004)
16. J.I. Charney, Is International Law Threatened by Multiple International Tribunals?, 271 Receuil des Cours 101, 134 (1998)
17. J. Martinez, Towards an International Judicial System, 56 Stan. L.Rev. 429, 486 (2003)
18. G. Born, International Civil Litigation in United States Courts 341 (1996)
19. P. Mayer, Litispendance, connexité et chose jugée dans l'arbitrage international, Liber Amicorum Claude Reymond 184, 194 (2004)
20. B. Hanotiau, Problems Raised by Complex Arbitrations Involving Multiple Contracts-Parties-Issues: An Analysis, 18 J. Int. Arb. 251, 350 (2001)
21. E.A. Young, Institutional Settlement in a Globalizing Judicial System, 54 Duke L. J. 1143, 1213 (2005)
22. A.-M. Slaughter, A New World Order 91 (2004)
23. Arthur T. von Mehren, Theory and Practice of Adjudicatory Authority in Private International Law: A Comparative Study of the Doctrine, Policies and Practices of Common and Civil Law Systems, 295 Receuil des Cours 27, 34 (2002)