Interpretation of Crowdsourced Activities Using Provenance Network Analysis

Proceedings of the 1st AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, HCOMP 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 78-85

  Huynh, T D ^a   Ebden, M ^b   Venanzi, M ^a   Ramchurn, S ^a   Roberts, S ^b   Moreau, L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; QUALITY CONTROL;

ACCURACY LEVEL; CLASSIFICATION OF DATA; DATA ITEMS; DOMAIN INDEPENDENTS; LEARN+; MAPPING APPLICATIONS; PROPERTY; REAL-WORLD;

CROWDSOURCING;

EID: 85040661977     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Altintas, I.; Anand, M.; Crawl, D.; Bowers, S.; Belloum, A.; Missier, P.; et al. 2010. Understanding collaborative studies through interoperable workflow provenance. In Third International Provenance and Annotation Workshop, 42–58.
2. Aron, J. 2011. Inside the race to crack the world’s hardest puzzle. The New Scientist 212(2841):26–27.
3. Bernstein, M. S.; Little, G.; Miller, R. C.; Hartmann, B.; Ackerman, M. S.; Karger, D. R.; Crowell, D.; Panovich, K.; and Arbor, A. 2010. Soylent: A Word Processor with a Crowd Inside. Artificial Intelligence 313–322.
4. Brandes, U., and Erlebach, T. 2005. Network Analysis: Methodological Foundations. Springer.
5. Ebden, M.; Huynh, T. D.; Moreau, L.; Ramchurn, S.; and Roberts, S. 2012. Network analysis on provenance graphs from a crowdsourcing application. In Groth, P., and Frew, J., eds., Provenance and Annotation of Data and Processes, volume 7525 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 168–182.
6. Kolaczyk, E. 2009. Statistical Analysis of Network Data. Springer.
7. Margo, D., and Smogor, R. 2010. Using provenance to extract semantic file attributes. In Proceedings of the 2nd conference on Theory and practice of provenance, Berkeley, USA, 7–7. TAPP’10, USENIX Association.
8. Moreau, L., and Missier, P. 2013. PROV-DM: The PROV Data Model. Technical report, World Wide Web Consortium. W3C Recommendation.
9. Moreau, L. 2010. The foundations for provenance on the web. Foundations and Trends in Web Science 2(2–3):99–241.
10. Park, H. 2003. Hyperlink network analysis: A new method for the study of social structure on the web. Connections 25(1):49–61.
11. Pedregosa, F.; Varoquaux, G.; Gramfort, A.; Michel, V.; Thirion, B.; Grisel, O.; Blondel, M.; Prettenhofer, P.; Weiss, R.; Dubourg, V.; Vanderplas, J.; Passos, A.; Cournapeau, D.; Brucher, M.; Perrot, M.; and Duchesnay, E. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12:2825–2830.
12. Quinlan, J. R. 1993. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
13. Ramchurn, S. D.; Huynh, T. D.; Venanzi, M.; and Shi, B. 2013. Collabmap: Crowdsourcing maps for emergency planning. In 5th ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci’13).
14. Teacy, W. T. L.; Patel, J.; Jennings, N. R.; and Luck, M. 2006. TRAVOS: Trust and Reputation in the Context of Inaccurate Information Sources. Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems 12(2):183–198.