Structure formats of randomised controlled trial abstracts: A cross-sectional analysis of their current usage and association with methodology reporting

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Hua, Fang ^a,b   Walsh, Tanya ^b   Glenny, Anne Marie ^b   Worthington, Helen ^b  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Consort; Editorial policies; Publishing; Randomized controlled trials; Reporting quality; Structured abstracts

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CHECKLIST; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; HUMAN; INTERNAL MEDICINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PILOT STUDY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLISHING; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SAMPLE SIZE;

EID: 85040353018     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12874-017-0469-3     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2016.
2. Kurata K, Morioka T, Yokoi K, Matsubayashi M. Remarkable growth of open access in the biomedical field: analysis of PubMed articles from 2006 to 2010. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e60925.
3. Hua F, Sun H, Walsh T, Worthington H, Glenny A-M. Open access to journal articles in dentistry: prevalence and citation impact. J Dent. 2016;47:41-8.
4. Fowkes FGR, Fulton PM. Critical-appraisal of published research - introductory guidelines. BMJ. 1991;302(6785):1136-40.
5. Saint S, Christakis DA, Saha S, Elmore JG, Welsh DE, Baker P, Koepsell TD. Journal reading habits of internists. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(12):881-4.
6. Cullen RJ. Search of evidence: family practitioners' use of the internet for clinical information. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA. 2002;90(4):370-9.
7. Groves T, Abbasi K. Screening research papers by reading abstracts. BMJ. 2004;329(7464):470-1.
8. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature. A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ad hoc working Group for Critical Appraisal of the medical literature. Ann Intern Med. 1987;106(4):598-604.
9. Haynes RB, Mulrow CD, Huth EJ, Altman DG, Gardner MJ. More informative abstracts revisited. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113(1):69-76.
10. Huth EJ. Structured abstracts for papers reporting clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 1987;106(4):626-7.
11. Lock S. Structured abstracts. BMJ. 1988;297(6642):156.
12. Rennie D, Glass RM. Structuring abstracts to make them more informative. JAMA. 1991;266(1):116-7.
13. Squires BP. Structured abstracts of original research and review articles. Can Med Assoc J. 1990;143(7):619-22.
14. Harbourt AM, Knecht LS, Humphreys BL. Structured abstracts in MEDLINE, 1989-1991. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1995;83(2):190-5.
15. Ripple AM, Mork JG, Knecht LS, Humphreys BL. A retrospective cohort study of structured abstracts in MEDLINE, 1992-2006. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA. 2011;99(2):160-3.
16. Taddio A, Pain T, Fassos FF, Boon H, Ilersich AL, Einarson TR. Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British medical journal, the Canadian Medical Association journal and the journal of the American Medical Association. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne. 1994;150(10):1611-5.
17. Hartley J. Current findings from research on structured abstracts. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA. 2004;92(3):368-71.
18. Sharma S, Harrison JE. Structured abstracts: do they improve the quality of information in abstracts? American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics: official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics. 2006;130(4):523-34.
19. Nakayama T, Hirai N, Yamazaki S, Naito M. Adoption of structured abstracts by general medical journals and format for a structured abstract. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA. 2005;93(2):237-42.
20. Relman AS. New information for authors - and readers. N Engl J Med. 1990;323(1):56.
21. The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653. Accessed 10 Oct 2016.
22. Merlin T, Weston A, Tooher R. Extending an evidence hierarchy to include topics other than treatment: revising the Australian 'levels of evidence'. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:34.
23. Hopewell S, Clarke M, Moher D, Wager E, Middleton P, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Group C. CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2008;5(1):e20.
24. Ghimire S, Kyung E, Lee H, Kim E. Oncology trial abstracts showed suboptimal improvement in reporting: a comparative before-and-after evaluation using CONSORT for abstract guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(6):658-66.
25. Guo JW, Iribarren SJ. Reporting quality for abstracts of randomized controlled trials in cancer nursing research. Cancer Nurs. 2014;37(6):436-44.
26. Jin L, Hua F, Cao Q. Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts published in leading laser medicine journals: an assessment using the CONSORT for abstracts guidelines. Lasers Med Sci. 2016;31(8):1583-90.
27. Hua F, Deng L, Kau CH, Jiang H, He H, Walsh T. Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts: survey of leading general dental journals. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939). 2015;146(9):669-678.e661.
28. Bigna JJ, Noubiap JJ, Asangbeh SL, Um LN, Sime PS, Temfack E, Tejiokem MC. Abstracts reporting of HIV/AIDS randomized controlled trials in general medicine and infectious diseases journals: completeness to date and improvement in the quality since CONSORT extension for abstracts. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):138.
29. Can OS, Yilmaz AA, Hasdogan M, Alkaya F, Turhan SC, Can MF, Alanoglu Z. Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of consolidated standards of reporting trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28(7):485-92.
30. Chen Y, Li J, Ai C, Duan Y, Wang L, Zhang M, Hopewell S. Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in five leading Chinese medical journals. PLoS One. 2010;5(8):e11926.
31. Ghimire S, Kyung E, Kang W, Kim E. Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals. Trials. 2012;13:77.
32. Wang L, Li Y, Li J, Zhang M, Xu L, Yuan W, Wang G, Hopewell S. Quality of reporting of trial abstracts needs to be improved: using the CONSORT for abstracts to assess the four leading Chinese medical journals of traditional Chinese medicine. Trials. 2010;11:75.
33. Mbuagbaw L, Thabane M, Vanniyasingam T, Borg Debono V, Kosa S, Zhang S, Ye C, Parpia S, Dennis BB, Thabane L. Improvement in the quality of abstracts in major clinical journals since CONSORT extension for abstracts: a systematic review. Contemporary clinical trials. 2014;38(2):245-50.
34. Sivendran S, Newport K, Horst M, Albert A, Galsky MD. Reporting quality of abstracts in phase III clinical trials of systemic therapy in metastatic solid malignancies. Trials. 2015;16
35. Chhapola V, Tiwari S, Brar R, Kanwal SK. An interrupted time series analysis showed suboptimal improvement in reporting quality of trial abstract. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;71:11-7.
36. Hays M, Andrews M, Wilson R, Callender D, O'Malley PG, Douglas K. Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts among high-impact general medical journals: a review and analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(7):e011082.
37. Cui Q, Tian J, Song X, Yang K. Does the CONSORT checklist for abstracts improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials on clinical pathways? J Eval Clin Pract. 2014;20(6):827-33.
38. von Elm E, Altman DG, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335(7624):806-8.
39. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M, Initiative S. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(8):W163-94.
40. Structured Abstracts https://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/policy/structured-abstracts.html. Accessed 15 Apr 2016.
41. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.
42. 2014 Journal Citation Reports® Science Edition https://jcr.incites.thomsonreuters.com/JCRJournalHomeAction.action. Accessed 20 Mar 2016.
43. Hua F, Walsh T, Glenny AM, Worthington H. Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts presented at European orthodontic society congresses. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38(6):584-492.
44. Meerpohl JJ, Wolff RF, Niemeyer CM, Antes G, von Elm E. Editorial policies of pediatric journals: survey of instructions for authors. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine. 2010;164(3):268-72.
45. Meerpohl JJ, Wolff RF, Antes G, von Elm E. Are pediatric open access journals promoting good publication practice? An analysis of author instructions. BMC Pediatr. 2011;11:27.
46. Hua F, Walsh T, Glenny A-M, Worthington H. Surveys on reporting guideline usage in dental journals. J Dent Res. 2016;95(11):1207-13.
47. Julious SA. Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm Stat. 2005;4(4):287-91.
48. Whitehead AL, Julious SA, Cooper CL, Campbell MJ. Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Stat Methods Med Res. 2015;25(3):1057-73.
49. Norman G, Streiner D. Biostatistics: the bare essentials. 3rd ed. Hamilton, Ontario: BC Decker Inc.; 2008.
50. Hopewell S, Ravaud P, Baron G, Boutron I. Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis. BMJ. 2012;344:e4178.
51. Altman DG. Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors. BMJ. 2005;330(7499):1056-7.
52. Hopewell S, Altman DG, Moher D, Schulz KF. Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to authors. Trials. 2008;9:20.
53. Knuppel H, Metz C, Meerpohl JJ, Strech D. How psychiatry journals support the unbiased translation of clinical research. A cross-sectional study of editorial policies. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e75995.
54. Kunath F, Grobe HR, Rucker G, Engehausen D, Antes G, Wullich B, Meerpohl JJ. Do journals publishing in the field of urology endorse reporting guidelines? A survey of author instructions. Urol Int. 2012;88(1):54-9.
55. Shamseer L, Hopewell S, Altman DG, Moher D, Schulz KF. Update on the endorsement of CONSORT by high impact factor journals: a survey of journal »instructions to authors» in 2014. Trials. 2016;17(1):301.
56. Pandis N, Walsh T, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Cluster randomized clinical trials in orthodontics: design, analysis and reporting issues. Eur J Orthod. 2013;35(5):669-75.
57. Campbell MK, Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Grp C. Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2012;345
58. Sedgwick P. Clinical trials: units of randomisation. BMJ. 2014;348:g3297.
59. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340
60. Hopewell S, Clarke M, Moher D, Wager E, Middleton P, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Group C. CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts. Lancet. 2008;371(9609):281-3.
61. Vickerstaff V, Ambler G, King M, Nazareth I, Omar RZ. Are multiple primary outcomes analysed appropriately in randomised controlled trials? A review. Contemporary clinical trials. 2015;45:8-12.
62. Mills E, Wu P, Gagnier J, Heels-Ansdell D, Montori VM. An analysis of general medical and specialist journals that endorse CONSORT found that reporting was not enforced consistently. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(7):662-7.
63. Innvaer S, Vist G, Trommald M, Oxman A. Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. Journal of health services research & policy. 2002;7(4):239-44.
64. Glasziou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Clarke M, Julious S, Michie S, Moher D, Wager E. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet. 2014;383(9913):267-76.