The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps

New Media and Society

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 881-900

  Light, Ben ^a   Burgess, Jean ^b   Duguay, Stefanie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Apps; cultural studies; digital methods; mobile media; qualitative methods; STS; walkthrough

Indexed keywords

EID: 85040341546     PISSN: 14614448     EISSN: 14617315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461444816675438     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bartky SL, (2003) Foucault, femininity, and the modernization of patriarchal power: sexuality, appearance, and behavior. In: Weitz R, (ed.) The Politics of Women’s Bodies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 25–45.
2. Berry DM, (2011) The computational turn: thinking about the digital humanities. Culture Machine 12: 1–22.
3. Blackwell C, Birnholtz J, Abbott C, (2015) Seeing and being seen: co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app. New Media & Society 17(7): 1117–1136.
4. Brock A, (2012) From the blackhand side: twitter as a cultural conversation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 56(4): 529–549.
5. Brubaker JR, Ananny M, Crawford K, (2014) Departing glances: a sociotechnical account of ‘leaving’ Grindr. New Media & Society 18(3): 373–390.
6. Bucher T, Helmond A, (2016) The affordances of social media platforms. In: Burgess J, Poell T, Marwick A, (eds) The Sage Handbook of Social Media. London; New York: SAGE.
7. Burgess J, (2012) The iPhone moment, the Apple Brand and the creative consumer: from ‘hackability and usability’ to cultural generativity. In: Hjorth L, Richardson I, Burgess J, (eds) Studying Mobile Media: Cultural Technologies, Mobile Communication, and the iPhone. New York: Routledge, pp. 28–42.
8. Burgess J, Bruns A, (2015) Easy data, hard data: the politics and pragmatics of Twitter research after the computational turn. In: Langlois G, Redden J, Elmer G, (eds) Compromised Data: From Social Media to Big Data. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 93–113.
9. Callon M, (1989) Society in the making: the study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In: Bijker WE, Hughes TP, Pinch T, (eds) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 83–103.
10. Dourish P, Button G, (1998) On ‘technomethodology’: foundational relationships between ethnomethodology and system design. Human-Computer Interaction 13(4): 395–432.
11. Du Gay P, Hall S, Janes L. (2013) Doing Cultural Studies: The Story of the Sony Walkman. 2nd ed. London: SAGE.
12. Duguay S, (2016) Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, and Queer visibility through selfies: comparing platform mediators across Ruby Rose’s Instagram and Vine presence. Social Media + Society 2(2): 1–12.
13. Duguay S, (2017) Dressing up Tinderella: interrogating authenticity claims on the mobile dating app Tinder. Information, Communication & Society 20(3): 351–367.
14. Duguay S, Burgess J, Light B, (2017) Mobile dating and hookup app culture. In: Messaris P, Humphreys L, (eds) Digital Media: Transformations in Human Communication. 2nd ed. New York: Peter Lang.
15. Eglash R, (2004) Appropriating technology: an introduction. In: Eglash R, Croissant JL, Chiro GD. (eds) Appropriating Technology: Vernacular Science and Social Power. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. vii–xxi.
16. Fagan ME, (1976) Design and code inspections to reduce errors in program development. IBM Systems Journal 15(3): 182–211.
17. Fiesler C, Lampe C, Bruckman AS, (2016) Reality and perception of copyright terms of service for online content creation. In: Proceedings of the CSCW’16, San Francisco, CA, 27 February–2 March.
18. Gibson JJ, (2015) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New York: Psychology Press.
19. Goggin G, (2011) Ubiquitous apps: politics of openness in global mobile cultures. Digital Creativity 22(3): 148–159.
20. Grimes SM, (2015) Little big scene. Cultural Studies 29(3): 379–400.
21. Hammersley M, Atkinson P, (2007) Ethnography: Principles in Practice. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
22. Hoffmann AL, Proferes N, Zimmer M, (2018) ‘Making the world more open and connected’: mark Zuckerberg and the discursive construction of Facebook and its users. New Media & Society 20(1): 199–218.
23. Jørgensen KM, (2016) The media go-along: researching mobilities with media at hand. Journal of Media and Communication Research 60: 32–49.
24. Karppi T, (2011) Digital suicide and the biopolitics of leaving Facebook. Transformations: Journal of Media and Culture 20. Available at: http://transformationsjournal.org/journal/issue_20/article_02.shtml
25. Latour B, (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Lee SH, Hoffman KD, (2015) Learning the ShamWow: creating infomercials to teach the AIDA model. Marketing Education Review 25(1): 9–14.
27. Lewis C, Polson PG, Wharton C. (1990) Testing a walkthrough methodology for theory-based design of walk-up-and-use interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Seattle, WA, April 1-5 1990, pp. 235–242. New York: ACM.
28. Light B, (2014) Disconnecting with Social Networking Sites. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
29. Light B, (2016a) The rise of speculative devices: hooking up with the bots of Ashley Madison. First Monday 21(6). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/6426/5525
30. Light B, (2016) Producing sexual cultures and pseudonymous publics with digital networks. In: Lind R, (ed.) Race and Gender in Electronic Media: Challenges and Opportunities. London: Routledge UK, 231–246.
31. Light B, Cassidy E, (2014) Strategies for the suspension and prevention of connection: rendering disconnection as socioeconomic lubricant with Facebook. New Media & Society 16(7): 1169–1184.
32. Light B, McGrath K, (2010) Ethics and social networking sites: a disclosive analysis of Facebook. Information Technology & People 23(4): 290–311.
33. Light B, Fletcher G, Adam A, (2008) Gay men, Gaydar and the commodification of difference. Information Technology & People 21(3): 300–314.
34. Lillie J, (2012) Nokia’s MMS: a cultural analysis of mobile picture messaging. New Media & Society 14(1): 80–97.
35. McVeigh-Schultz J, Baym NK, (2015) Thinking of you: vernacular affordance in the context of the microsocial relationship app, Couple. Social Media + Society 1(2): 1–13.
36. Maureira MG, (2014) Tender – it’s how people meat. Available at: https://vimeo.com/111997940 (accessed 7 July 2016).
37. Mowlabocus S, (2008) Revisiting old haunts through new technologies: public (homo)sexual cultures in cyberspace. International Journal of Cultural Studies 11(4): 419–439.
38. Nakamura L, (2002) Cybertypes: Race, Ethnicity, and Identity on the Internet. London: Routledge.
39. Nickerson RS, Landauer TK, (1997) Human-computer interaction: background and issues. In: Helander MG, Landauer TK, Prabhu PV, (eds) Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 3–32.
40. Nieborg DB, (2015) Crushing candy: the free-to-play game in its connective commodity form. Social Media + Society 1(2): 1–12.
41. Norman DA, (1988) The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
42. Papacharissi Z, (2009) The virtual geographies of social networks: a comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld. New Media & Society 11(1–2): 199–220.
43. Pfaffenberger B, (1992) Technological dramas. Science, Technology & Human Values 17(3): 282–312.
44. Plantin J-C, Lagoze C, Edwards PN. (2018) Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society 20(1): 293–310.
45. Pressman RS, (2005) Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach. London: McGraw-Hill.
46. Rieder B, Röhle T, (2012) Digital methods: five challenges. In: Berry DM, (ed.) Understanding Digital Humanities. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 67–84.
47. Robards B, Lincoln S, (2016) Making it ‘Facebook official’: reflecting on romantic relationships through sustained Facebook use. Social Media + Society 2(4): 1–10.
48. Rogers R, (2013) Digital Methods. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Sandvig C, Hamilton K, Karahalios K. (2014) An algorithm audit. In: Gangadharan SP, (ed.) Data and Discrimination: Collected Essays. Washington, DC: New America Foundation, pp. 6–10.
50. Singh M, Balasubramanian SK, Chakraborty G, (2000) A comparative analysis of three communication formats: advertising, infomercial, and direct experience. Journal of Advertising 29(4): 59–75.
51. Smith P, Sanchez A, (2015) Let’s play, video streams, and the evolution of new digital literacy. In: Zaphiris P, Loannou A, (eds) Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Los Angeles, CA: Springer, pp. 520–527.
52. Snee H, Hine C, Morey Y. (eds) (2015) Digital Methods for Social Science: An Interdisciplinary Guide to Research Innovation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
53. Star SL, (1999) The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist 43(3): 377–391.
54. Statista.com (2015) Worldwide mobile app revenues from 2011–2017 (in billion US dollars). Available at: http://www.statista.com/statistics/269025/worldwide-mobile-app-revenue-forecast/ (accessed 21 August 2015).
55. Uddin G, Robillard MP, (2015) How API documentation fails. IEEE Software 32(4): 68–75.
56. Van Dijck J, (2013) The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. Williams R, (1974) Television: Technology and Cultural Form. London and New York: Routledge.
58. Zelenko M, (2015) A brilliant Tinder hack made hundreds of bros unwittingly flirt with each other. The Verge. Available at: http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/25/8277743/tinder-hack-bros-swiping-bros (accessed 11 September 2016).