Development of a computerized adaptive test suicide scale—The CAT-SS

Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Volumn 78, Issue 9, 2017, Pages 1376-1382

  Gibbons, Robert D ^a   Kupfer, David ^b   Frank, Ellen ^b   Moore, Tara ^c   Beiser, David G ^a   Boudreaux, Edwin D ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR ASSESSMENT; COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TEST SUICIDE SCALE; COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTING; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAJOR DEPRESSION; MALE; MANIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SUICIDAL IDEATION; SUICIDE; SUICIDE ATTEMPT; VALIDATION STUDY; ADOLESCENT; AGED; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DEPRESSION; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANXIETY; DEPRESSION; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SUICIDAL IDEATION; SUICIDE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85040062540     PISSN: 01606689     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4088/JCP.16m10922     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Betz ME, Arias SA, Miller M, et al. Change in emergency department providers’ beliefs and practices after use of new protocols for suicidal patients. Psychiatr Serv. 2015;66(6):625–631.
2. Kocalevent RD, Hinz A, Brähler E. Standardization of the depression screener Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in the general population. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013;35(5):551–555.
3. Bauer AM, Chan YF, Huang H, et al. Characteristics, management, and depression outcomes of primary care patients who endorse thoughts of death or suicide on the PHQ-9. JGenInternMed. 2013;28(3):363–369.
4. Beck AT, Steer RA. BSI, Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation: Manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson; 1991.
5. Davidson CL, Wingate LRR, Grant DM, et al. Interpersonal suicide risk and ideation: the influence of depression and social anxiety. JSocClinPsychol. 2011;30(8):842–855.
6. Hawton K, Casañas I Comabella C, Haw C, et al. Risk factors for suicide in individuals with depression: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2013;147(1-3):17–28.
7. Cassidy F. Risk factors of attempted suicide in bipolar disorder. SuicideLifeThreatBehav. 2011;41(1):6–11.
8. McIntyre RS, Muzina DJ, Kemp DE, et al. Bipolar disorder and suicide: research synthesis and clinical translation. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2008;10(1):66–72.
9. Bolton JM, Cox BJ, Afifi TO, et al. Anxiety disorders and risk for suicide attempts: findings from the Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment area follow-up study. Depress Anxiety. 2008;25(6):477–481.
10. Weiss DJ. Adaptive testing by computer. JConsultClinPsychol. 1985;53(6):774–789.
11. Lord FM, Novick MR. StatisticalTheoriesof MentalTestScores. Reading, MA: Addison-Welsley Publishing Company; 1968.
12. Traub R. Classical test theory in historical perspective. EducationalMeasures:Issuesand Practice. 1997;16(4):8–14.
13. Meijer RR, Nering ML. Computerized adaptive testing: overview and introduction. Appl PsycholMeas. 1999;23(3):187–194.
14. PROMIS instrument development and psychometric evaluation scientific standards. HealthMeasures website. http://www.nihpromis.org/Documents/PROMIS_ Standards_050212.pdf. Accessed May 09, 2015.
15. De Beurs DP, de Vries ALM, de Groot MH, et al. Applying computer adaptive testing to optimize online assessment of suicidal behavior: a simulation study. JMedInternetRes. 2014;16(9):e207.
16. Gibbons RD, Bock D, Hedeker D, et al. Full-information item bifactor analysis of graded response data. ApplPsycholMeas. 2007;31(1):4–19.
17. Gibbons RD, Weiss DJ, Pilkonis PA, et al. Development of a computerized adaptive test for depression. ArchGenPsychiatry. 2012;69(11):1104–1112.
18. Gibbons RD, Hedeker D. Full information item bi-factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1992;57(3):423–436.
19. Data and Surveillance Task Force of the National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention. Improving national data systems for surveillance of suicide-related events. AmJPrev Med. 2014;47(suppl 2):S122–S129.
20. Cochran WG, Cox GM. ExperimentalDesigns. New York, NY: Wiley; 1957.
21. Posner K, Brown GK, Stanley B, et al. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. AmJPsychiatry. 2011;168(12):1266–1277.
22. Bock RD, Aitkin M. Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika. 1981;46(4):443–459.
23. Breiman L. Random forests. MachLearn. 2001;45(1):5–32.
24. Beiser D, Vu M, Gibbons R. Test-retest reliability of a computerized adaptive depression screener. Psychiatr Serv. 2016;67(9):1039–1041.
25. Thissen D, Steinberg L, Wainer H. Detection of differential item functioning using the parameters of item response models. In: Holland P, Wainer H, eds. DifferentialItem Functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1993:67–100.
26. Cai L, Yang JS, Hansen M. Generalized full-information item bifactor analysis. Psychol Methods. 2011;16(3):221–248.