CSAR: A contig scaffolding tool using algebraic rearrangements

Bioinformatics

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 109-111

  Chen, Kun Tze ^a   Liu, Chia Liang ^a   Huang, Shang Hao ^a   Shen, Hsin Ting ^a   Shieh, Yi Kung ^a   Chiu, Hsien Tai ^b   Lu, Chin Lung ^a  

^a NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BACTERIUM; CONTIG MAPPING; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOMICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE;

ALGORITHMS; BACTERIA; CONTIG MAPPING; GENOME; GENOMICS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 85040034372     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx543     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Gurevich, A. et al. (2013) QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics, 29, 1072-1075.
2. Kurtz, S. et al. (2004) Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol., 5, R12.
3. Lu, C.L. (2015) An efficient algorithm for the contig ordering problem under algebraic rearrangement distance. J. Comput. Biol., 22, 975-987.
4. Lu, C.L. et al. (2014) CAR: contig assembly of prokaryotic draft genomes using rearrangements. BMC Bioinformatics, 15, 381.
5. Pop, M. (2009) Genome assembly reborn: recent computational challenges. Brief. Bioinf., 10, 354-366.
6. Richter, D.C. et al. (2007) OSLay: optimal syntenic layout of unfinished assemblies. Bioinformatics, 23, 1573-1579.
7. Rissman, A.I. et al. (2009) Reordering contigs of draft genomes using the Mauve Aligner. Bioinformatics, 25, 2071-2073.
8. van Hijum, S.A.F.T. et al. (2005) Projector 2: contig mapping for efficient gap-closure of prokaryotic genome sequence assemblies. Nucleic Acids Res., 33, W560-W566.