Helpfulness-Guided Review Summarization

Proceedings of the 2013 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL-HLT 2013 - Student Research Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 77-83

  Xiong, Wenting ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING;

AUTOMATED ASSESSMENT; HOT TOPICS; REVIEW CONTENTS; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS;

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 85039900338     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. M. Ando and S. Ishizaki. 2012. Analysis of travel review data from readers point of view. WASSA 2012, page 47.
2. D.M. Blei and J.D. McAuliffe. 2010. Supervised topic models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1003.0783.
3. D.M. Blei, A.Y. Ng, and M.I. Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. the Journal of machine Learning research, 3:993–1022.
4. SRK Branavan, H. Chen, J. Eisenstein, and R. Barzilay. 2009. Learning document-level semantic properties from free-text annotations. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 34(2):569.
5. S. Brody and N. Elhadad. 2010. An unsupervised aspect-sentiment model for online reviews. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 804–812. Association for Computational Linguistics.
6. G. Carenini, R. Ng, and A. Pauls. 2006. Multi-document summarization of evaluative text. In In Proceedings of the 11st Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Citeseer.
7. Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Gueorgi Kossinets, Jon Kleinber g, and Lillian Lee. 2009. How opinions are received by online communities: A case study on Amazon .com helpfulness votes. In Proceedings of WWW, pages 141–150.
8. Kavita Ganesan, ChengXiang Zhai, and Jiawei Han. 2010. Opinosis: a graph-based approach to abstractive summarization of highly redundant opinions. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING’10, pages 340–348, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
9. Anindya Ghose and Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis. 2008. Estimating the socio-economic impact of product reviews. In NYU Stern Research Working Paper CeDER.
10. M. Hu and B. Liu. 2004. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 168–177. ACM.
11. N. Jindal and B. Liu. 2008. Opinion spam and analysis. In Proceedings of the international conference on Web search and web data mining, pages 219–230.
12. H.D. Kim and C.X. Zhai. 2009. Generating comparative summaries of contradictory opinions in text. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management, pages 385–394. ACM.
13. Soo-Min Kim, Patrick Pantel, Tim Chklovski, and Marco Pennacchiotti. 2006. Automatically assessing review helpfulness. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP2006), pages 423–430, Sydney, Australia, July.
14. K. Lerman, S. Blair-Goldensohn, and R. McDonald. 2009. Sentiment summarization: Evaluating and learning user preferences. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 514–522. Association for Computational Linguistics.
15. Annie Louis and Ani Nenkova. 2009. Automatically evaluating content selection in summarization without human models. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Volume 1-Volume 1, pages 306–314. Association for Computational Linguistics.
16. Y. Lu and C. Zhai. 2008. Opinion integration through semi-supervised topic modeling. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 121–130. ACM.
17. Q. Mei, X. Ling, M. Wondra, H. Su, and C.X. Zhai. 2007. Topic sentiment mixture: modeling facets and opinions in weblogs. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 171–180. ACM.
18. S.M. Mudambi and D. Schuff. 2010. What makes a helpful online review? a study of customer reviews on amazon. com. MIS quarterly, 34(1):185–200.
19. A. Mukherjee and B. Liu. 2012. aspect extraction through semi-supervised modeling. In Proceedings of 50th anunal meeting of association for computational Linguistics (acL-2012)(accepted for publication).
20. Melissa M. Nelson and Christian D. Schunn. 2009. The nature of feedback: how different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. In Instructional Science, volume 37, pages 375–401.
21. A.M. Popescu and O. Etzioni. 2005. Extracting product features and opinions from reviews. In Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 339–346. Association for Computational Linguistics.
22. D. Radev, T. Allison, S. Blair-Goldensohn, J. Blitzer, A. Celebi, S. Dimitrov, E. Drabek, A. Hakim, W. Lam, D. Liu, et al. 2004. Mead-a platform for multidocument multilingual text summarization. In Proceedings of LREC, volume 2004.
23. C. Sauper and R. Barzilay. 2013. Automatic aggregation by joint modeling of aspects and values. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 46:89–127.
24. V. Stoyanov and C. Cardie. 2008. Topic identification for fine-grained opinion analysis. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics-Volume 1, pages 817–824. Association for Computational Linguistics.
25. I. Titov and R. McDonald. 2008a. A joint model of text and aspect ratings for sentiment summarization. Urbana, 51:61801.
26. I. Titov and R. McDonald. 2008b. Modeling online reviews with multi-grain topic models. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 111–120. ACM.
27. Wenting Xiong and Diane Litman. 2011. Automatically predicting peer-review helpfulness. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 502–507.
28. J. Yu, Z.J. Zha, M. Wang, and T.S. Chua. 2011. Aspect ranking: identifying important product aspects from online consumer reviews. Computational Linguistics, pages 1496–1505.