Magnetic ground state of the pyrochlore oxide (formula presented)

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 5, 2003, Pages

  Fukazawa, H ^a   Maeno, Y ^a,a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85038903790     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.054410     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. P W. Anderson, Mater. Res. Bull.8, 153 (1973).
2. A P. Ramirez, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci.24, 453 (1994).
3. A B. Harris, A J. Berlinsky, and C. Bruder, J. Appl. Phys.69, 5200 (1991).
4. J N. Reimers, Phys. Rev. B45, 7287 (1992).
5. B. Canals and C. Lacroix, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 2933 (1998).
6. A. Koga and N. Kawakami, Phys. Rev. B63, 144432 (2001).
7. H. Tsunetsugu, Phys. Rev. B65, 024415 (2002).
8. M. Shiga, K. Fujisaki, and H. Wada, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.62, 1329 (1993).
9. R. Ballou, E. Lelièvre-Berna, and B. Fåk, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 2125 (1996).
10. D. Yanagishima and Y. Maeno, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.70, 2880 (2001).
11. N. Taira, M. Wakeshima, and Y. Hinatsu, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter13, 5527 (2001).
12. H. Fukazawa and Y. Maeno, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.71, 2578 (2002).
13. S. Inagaki and R. Kubo, Int. J. Magn.4, 139 (1973).
14. H. Sakai, M. Kato, K. Yoshimura, and K. Kosuge, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.71, 422 (2002).
15. M. Isobe and Y. Ueda, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.71, 1848 (2002).
16. J E. Greedan, J. Mater. Chem.11, 37 (2001).
17. G V. Buzuev and G P. Shveikin, Russ. J. Inorg. Chem.18, 1021 (1973).
18. M A. Subramanian, G. Aravamundan, and G V. Subba Rao, Prog. Solid State Chem.15, 55 (1983).
19. S. Ya Istomin, O G. D’yachenko, E V. Antipov, and G. Svensson, Mater. Res. Bull.32, 421 (1997).
20. S. Ya Istomin, O G. D’yachenko, E V. Antipov, G. Svensson, and B. Lundqvist, Mater. Res. Bull.33, 1251 (1998).
21. H. Fukazawa, R. Higashinaka, O. Sakai, and Y. Maeno (unpublished).
22. With the help of S. Shamoto (private communication) it was shown by a Rietveld analysis [(RIETAN-2000), F. Izumi and T. Ikeda, Mater. Sci. Forum321-324, 198 (2000)] of our x-ray diffraction data that the oxygen occupation and the oxygen position of the end member (formula presented) are those for a pyrochlore structure but not for an oxygen-deficient fluorite structure.
23. B E. Scheetz and W B. White, J. Am. Ceram. Soc.62, 468 (1979).
24. We performed background subtraction for all the data by using the following formula: (formula presented) Here, (formula presented) and (formula presented) are the background magnetization, the magnetization with mass (formula presented) and the magnetization with mass (formula presented) respectively.
25. Because of the limitation of the sample space in an oven of the magnetometer, it was necessary to reduce the sample weight. Thus, the high-temperature data was obtained under a high field of 7 T. We confirmed that the data between 300 and 350 K at 7 T with the oven quantitatively agree with those at 0.1 T without the oven.
26. K. Ishida and Y. Kitaoka (private communication).
27. This difference may be attributable to the uncertainty in the demagnetization effect.
28. As clearly seen in Fig. 33, the Brillouin function for S larger than (formula presented) worsens the fits.
29. R. Pynn, J D. Axe, and R. Thomas, Phys. Rev. B13, 2965 (1976).
30. N. Tsuda, K. Nasu, A. Fujimori, and K. Siratori, Electronic Conduction in Oxides (Shokabo, Tokyo, 1993) (in Japanese) pp. 24, 45, and the references therein.
31. S. Fujimoto, Phys. Rev. B64, 085102 (2001).
32. S. Shamoto, T. Nakano, Y. Nozue, and T. Kajitani, J. Phys. Chem. Solids63, 1047 (2002).
33. H. Harima (private communication)