Determining the optimal carbon tax rate based on data envelopment analysis

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 172, Issue , 2018, Pages 900-908

  Jin, Minyue ^a   Shi, Xiao ^b   Emrouznejad, Ali ^c   Yang, Feng ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^b SHANDONG UNIVERSITY OF FINANCE AND ECONOMICS   (China)

^c ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Carbon emissions; Carbon tax policy; Centralized DEA approach; Government expenditure; Government revenue

Indexed keywords

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ECONOMICS; EMISSION CONTROL; GREENHOUSE GASES; PUBLIC POLICY;

CARBON EMISSIONS; CARBON TAXES; CENTRALIZED DEA APPROACH; COMPETING FIRMS; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE; MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING PROBLEMS; PRICING STRATEGY;

TAXATION;

EID: 85038871478     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.127     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. 2 emission on the economic growth and financial development in the Sub Saharan African countries. Energy 39:1 (2012), 180–186.
2. Avi-Yonah, R.S., Uhlmann, D.M., Combating global climate change: why a carbon tax is a better response to global warming than cap and trade. Stanf. Environ. Law J. 28:3 (2009), 3–50.
3. Bansal, S., Choice and design of regulatory instruments in the presence of green consumers. Resour. Energy Econ. 30:3 (2008), 345–368.
4. Bei, L.T., Simpson, E.M., The determinants of consumers' purchase decisions for recycled products: an application of acquisition-transaction utility theory. Adv. Consum. Res., 22, 1995 257–257.
5. Bi, G., Jin, M., Ling, L., Yang, F., Environmental subsidy and the choice of green technology in the presence of green consumers. Ann. Oper. Res., 2016, 10.1007/s10479-016-2106-7 online.
6. Bian, Y., Yang, F., Resource and environment efficiency analysis of provinces in China: a DEA approach based on Shannon's entropy. Energy Policy 38:4 (2010), 1909–1917.
7. Chen, C., Design for the environment: a quality-based model for green product development. Manag. Sci. 47:2 (2001), 250–263.
8. Chen, L., Jia, G., Environmental efficiency analysis of China's regional industry: a data envelopment analysis (DEA) based approach. J. Clean. Prod. 142 (2017), 846–853.
9. Cohen, M.C., Lobel, R., Perakis, G., The impact of demand uncertainty on consumer subsidies for green technology adoption. Manag. Sci. 62:5 (2015), 1235–1258.
10. Drake, D.F., Kleindorfer, P.R., Van Wassenhove, L.N., Technology choice and capacity portfolios under emissions regulation. Prod. Oper. Manag. 25:6 (2016), 1006–1025.
11. Fang, L., A generalized DEA model for centralized resource allocation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 228:2 (2013), 405–412.
12. Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Kokkelenberg, E.C., Measuring plant capacity, utilization and technical change: a nonparametric approach. Int. Econ. Rev., 1989, 655–666.
13. Grubb, M., Kyoto and the future of international climate change responses: from here to where. Int. Rev. Environ. Strat. 5:1 (2004), 15–38.
14. Han, Y., Geng, Z., Zhu, Q., Qu, Y., Energy efficiency analysis method based on fuzzy DEA cross-model for ethylene production systems in chemical industry. Energy 83 (2015), 685–695.
15. Huang, J., Leng, M., Liang, L., Liu, J., Promoting electric automobiles: supply chain analysis under a government's subsidy incentive scheme. IIE Trans. 45:8 (2013), 826–844.
16. Ji, J., Zhang, Z., Yang, L., Comparisons of initial carbon allowance allocation rules in an O2O retail supply chain with the cap-and-trade regulation. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 2017 online https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.011.
17. Krass, D., Nedorezov, T., Ovchinnikov, A., Environmental taxes and the choice of green technology. Prod. Oper. Manag. 22:5 (2013), 1035–1055.
18. Lee, K.H., Integrating carbon footprint into supply chain management: the case of Hyundai Motor Company (HMC) in the automobile industry. J. Clean. Prod. 19:11 (2011), 1216–1223.
19. 2 emissions. Energy Policy 39:9 (2011), 5137–5146.
20. Liu, B., Holmbom, M., Segerstedt, A., Chen, W., Effects of carbon emission regulations on remanufacturing decisions with limited information of demand distribution. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53:2 (2015), 532–548.
21. Lozano, S., Villa, G., Centralized DEA models with the possibility of downsizing. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 56:4 (2005), 357–364.
22. Lozano, S., Villa, G., Adenso-Dıaz, B., Centralised target setting for regional recycling operations using DEA. Omega 32:2 (2004), 101–110.
23. Lozano, S., Villa, G., Canca, D., Application of centralised DEA approach to capital budgeting in Spanish ports. Comput. Ind. Eng. 60:3 (2011), 455–465.
24. Manikas, A.S., Kroes, J.R., A newsvendor approach to compliance and production under cap and trade emissions regulation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 159 (2015), 274–284.
25. Mankiw, N.G., Weinzierl, M., Yagan, D., Optimal taxation in theory and practice. J. Econ. Perspect. 23:4 (2009), 147–174.
26. McKinsey&Company, The Next Environmental Issue for Business: McKinsey Global Survey Results. 2010, Mckinsey.com http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability-and-resource-productivity/our-insights/the-next-environmental-issue-for-business-mckinsey-global-survey-results (Accessed 4 August 2017).
27. Park, S.J., Cachon, G.P., Lai, G., Seshadri, S., Supply chain design and carbon penalty: monopoly vs. monopolistic competition. Prod. Oper. Manag. 24:9 (2015), 1494–1508.
28. Qiu, Y., Qiao, J., Pardalos, P.M., A branch-and-price algorithm for production routing problems with carbon cap-and-trade. Omega 68 (2017), 49–61.
29. Raz, G., Druehl, C.T., Blass, V., Design for the environment: life-cycle approach using a newsvendor model. Prod. Oper. Manag. 22:4 (2013), 940–957.
30. Song, M., Wang, S., Liu, W., A two-stage DEA approach for environmental efficiency measurement. Environ. Monit. Assess. 186:5 (2014), 3041–3051.
31. Sun, Z., Luo, R., Zhou, D., Optimal path for controlling sectoral CO2 emissions among China's regions: a centralized DEA approach. Sustainability, 8(1), 2015, 28.
32. Wang, K., Yu, S., Zhang, W., China's regional energy and environmental efficiency: a DEA window analysis based dynamic evaluation. Math. Comput. Model. 58:5 (2013), 1117–1127.
33. Wang, Y., Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., Trajectory and driving factors for GHG emissions in the Chinese cement industry. J. Clean. Prod. 53 (2013), 252–260.
34. Wang, M., Liu, K., Choi, T.M., Yue, X., Effects of carbon emission taxes on transportation mode selections and social welfare. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 45:11 (2015), 1413–1423.
35. Wu, J., Yin, P., Sun, J., Chu, J., Liang, L., Evaluating the environmental efficiency of a two-stage system with undesired outputs by a DEA approach: an interest preference perspective. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 254:3 (2016), 1047–1062.
36. Xie, B.C., Shang, L.F., Yang, S.B., Yi, B.W., Dynamic environmental efficiency evaluation of electric power industries: evidence from OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) and BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) countries. Energy 74 (2014), 147–157.
37. Xu, X., Xu, X., He, P., Joint production and pricing decisions for multiple products with cap-and-trade and carbon tax regulations. J. Clean. Prod. 112 (2016), 4093–4106.
38. Yu, M.M., Chern, C.C., Hsiao, B., Human resource rightsizing using centralized data envelopment analysis: evidence from Taiwan's Airports. Omega 41:1 (2013), 119–130.
39. Zakeri, A., Dehghanian, F., Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., Carbon pricing versus emissions trading: a supply chain planning perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 164 (2015), 197–205.
40. Zhang, B., Xu, L., Multi-item production planning with carbon cap and trade mechanism. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 144:1 (2013), 118–127.
41. Zhou, P., Sun, Z.R., Zhou, D.Q., Optimal path for controlling CO2 emissions in China: a perspective of efficiency analysis. Energy Econ. 45 (2014), 99–110.