Choice and design of regulatory instruments in the presence of green consumers

Resource and Energy Economics

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 345-368

  Bansal, Sangeeta ^a  

^a JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Ad valorem tax subsidy; Damage parameter; Emission tax; Green consumers; Vertical differentiation; Welfare

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS; FEES AND CHARGES; TAXATION;

AD VALOREM TAX-SUBSIDY; EMISSION TAX; GREEN CONSUMERS;

PUBLIC POLICY;

EMISSIONS TRADING; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ENVIRONMENTAL TAX;

EID: 44649127404     PISSN: 09287655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2008.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Arora S., and Gangopadhyay S. Toward a theoretical model of voluntary overcompliance. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization 28 (1995) 289-309
2. Bansal, S., 2001. Environmental regulation in the presence of environmentally conscious consumers. Ph.D. Thesis. Indian Statistical Institute.
3. Bansal S., and Gangopadhyay S. Tax/subsidy policies in the presence of environmentally aware consumers. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45 (2003) 333-355
4. Barnett A.H. The Pigouvian tax rule under monopoly. American Economic Review 70 5 (1980) 1037-1041
5. Crampes C., and Hollander. Duopoly and quality standards. European Economic Review 39 (1995) 71-82
6. Cremer H., and Thisse J.-F. Commodity taxation in a differentiated oligopoly. International Economic Review 35 3 (1994) 613-633
7. Cremer H., and Thisse J.-F. On the taxation of polluting products in a differentiated industry. European Economic Review 43 (1999) 575-594
8. Itoh M. Monopoly, Product Differentiation and Economic Welfare. Journal of Economic Theory 31 (1983) 88-104
9. Katsoulacos Y., and Xepapadeas A. Emission taxes and market structure. In: Carraro C., Katsoulacs Y., and Xepapadeas A. (Eds). Environmental Policy and Market Structure (1996), Kluwer, Boston
10. Khanna M., and Damon L.A. EPA's Voluntary 33/50 Program: Impact on toxic releases and economic performance of firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 37 (1999) 1-25
11. Kraftborsen, 2001. Svenska Kraftborsen AB website, Marknadsstatistik. http://www.kraftborsen.se (accessed November 15, 2001).
12. Lombardini-Riipinen C. Optimal Tax Policy under Environmental Quality Competition. Environmental and Resource Economics 32 (2005) 317-336
13. Lutz S., Lyon T.P., and Maxwell J.W. Quality leadership when regulatory standards are forthcoming. Journal of Industrial Economics XLVIII 3 (2000) 331-348
14. Moraga-Gonzalez J.L., and Padron-Fumero N. Environmental Policy in a Green Market. Environmental and Resource Economics 22 (2002) 419-447
15. Mussa M., and Rosen S. Monopoly and product quality. Journal of economic Theory 18 (1978) 301-317
16. Ronnen U. Minimum quality standards, fixed costs, and competition. Rand Journal of Economics 22 4 (1991) 491-504
17. Shaked A., and Sutton J. Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Review of Economic Studies 49 (1982) 3-13
18. Sterner, T., 2003. Policy instruments for environmental and natural resource management. Resources for the Future.
19. Tietenberg T. Disclosure strategies for pollution control. Environmental and Resource Economics 11 3-4 (1998) 587-602
20. World Bank, 2000. Greening industry: New roles for communities, markets and governments. World Bank policy research report. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.