Modeling and evaluation of product quality at conceptual design stage

International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management

Volumn 7, Issue , 2016, Pages 163-177

  Gupta, Shashank ^a   Kota, Srinivas ^a   Mishra, Rajesh P ^a  

^a BIRLA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

Conceptual design stage; Design alternatives; Digraph model; Product functions; Product quality

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; DIRECTED GRAPHS; FUNCTION EVALUATION; PRODUCT DESIGN;

ALTERNATIVE DESIGNS; CONCEPTUAL DESIGN STAGES; DESIGN ALTERNATIVES; DIGRAPH MODELS; EQUIVALENT MATRICES; PRODUCT FUNCTIONS; PRODUCT STRUCTURE; QUALITY FEATURES;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84997077938     PISSN: 09756809     EISSN: 09764348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13198-015-0357-3     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Ahmed H, Chateauneuf A (2014) Optimal number of tests to achieve and validate product reliability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. doi:10.1016/jress.2014.04.014
2. Akao Y (1990) Quality function deployment (QFD). Integrating customer requirements into product design, Cambridge
3. Akao Y, Mazur GH (2003) The leading edge in QFD: past, present and future. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 20(1):20–35
4. Al- Hakim L, Kusiak A, Mathew J (2000) A graph-theoretic approach to conceptual design with functional perspectives. Comput Aided Des 32(14):867–875
5. Baldwin C, Clark K (1999) Design Rules. Harvard University Press, Boston
6. Bouti A, Kadi DA (1994) A state-of-the-art review of FMEA/FMECA. Int J Reliab Qual Saf Eng 1(4):515–543
7. Brad S (2008) Vectors of innovation to support quality initiatives in the framework of ISO 9001: 2000. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 25(7):674–693
8. Cristiano JJ, Liker JK, White CC (2000) Customer-driven product development through quality function deployment in the U.S. and Japan. J Prod Innov Manag 17(4):286–308
9. Colledani M, Tolio T, Fischer A, Benoit Iung B, Lanza G, Schmitt R, Váncza J (2014) Design and management of manufacturing systems for production quality. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 63(2):773–796
10. Collins JA, Hagan BT, Bratt HM (1976) The failure experience matrix: a useful design tool. ASME Trans J Eng Ind 98(3):1074–1079
11. Coulibaly A, Mutel B, Ait-Kadi D (2007) Product modeling framework for behavioral performance evaluation at design stage. Comput Ind 58(6):438–449
12. Coulibaly A, Houssin R, Mutel B (2008) Maintainability and safety indicators at design stage for mechanical products. Comput Ind 59(5):438–449
13. Darvish M, Yasaei M, Saeedi A (2009) Application of the graph theory and matrix methods to contractor ranking. Int J Proj Manag 27(6):610–619
14. De Toni A, Tonchia S (1998) Manufacturing flexibility: a literature review. Int J Prod Res 36(6):1587–1617
15. Dekkers R, Chang CM, Kreutzfeldt J (2013) The interface between “product design and engineering” and manufacturing: a review of the literature and empirical evidence. Int J Prod Econ 144(1):316–333
16. Deo N (1974) Graph theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
17. Düpow H, Blount G (1997) A review of reliability prediction. Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol 69(4):356–362
18. Ebeling CE (2000) An introduction to reliability and maintainability engineering. Tata McGraw-Hill Education Private Limited, New Delhi
19. Fulton Suri J, Marsh M (2000) Scenario building as an ergonomics method in consumer product design. Appl Ergon 31(2):151–157
20. Gagnon B, Leduc R, Savard L (2012) From conventional to a sustainable engineering design process: different shades of sustainability. J Eng Des 23(1):49–74
21. Gao X, Barabady J, Markeset T (2010) An approach for prediction of petroleum production facility performance considering arctic influence factors. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95(8):837–846
22. Gupta P, Gandhi OP (2013) Ontological modeling of spatial shaft-position knowledge for steam turbine rotor. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 4(3):284–292
23. Gupta P, Gupta S, Gandhi OP (2013) Modeling and evaluation of MTTR at product design stage based on contextual criteria. J Eng Des 24(7):499–523
24. Harary F (1994) Graph theory, Addison–Wesley: reading. McGraw-Hill, Massachusetts
25. Heidari F, Loucopoulos P (2013) Quality evaluation framework (QEF): modeling and evaluating quality of business process. Int J Account Inf Syst. doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2013.09.002
26. Hempelmann F, Engelen A (2014) Integration of finance with marketing and R&D in new product development: the role of project stage. J Prod Innov Manag. doi:10.1111/jpim.12237
27. Hsu Y-H, Fang W (2009) Intellectual capital and new product development performance: the mediating role of organizational learning capability. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 76(5):664–677
28. Hua Z, Yang J, Coulibaly S, Zhang B (2006) Integration TRIZ with problem-solving tools: a literature review from 1995 to 2006. Int J Bus Innov Res 1(1–2):111–128
29. Inman RR, Blumenfeld DE, Huang N, Li J (2003) Designing production systems for quality: research opportunities from an automotive industry perspective. Int J Prod Res 41(9):1953–1971
30. Jiang P, Guo B, Lim J-H, Zuo MJ (2010) Group judgement of relationship between product reliability and quality characteristics based on Bayesian theory and expert’s experience. Expert Syst Appl 37(10):6844–6849
31. Jin S, Zheng C, Yu K, Lai X (2010) Tolerance design optimization on cost-quality trade-off using shapely value method. J Manuf Syst 29(4):142–150
32. Bouza-Rodríguez JB, Alberto C-C, Agustín M-D (2014) A graphical method to assist quality decisions throughout the product development process. Qual Eng 26(4):467–478
33. Jurkat WB, Ryser HJ (1966) Matrix factorization of determinants and permanents. J Algebra 3(1):1–27
34. Karunanithi N, Whitley D, Malaiya YK (1992) Using neural networks in reliability prediction. Softw IEEE 9(4):53–59
35. Kayrbekova D, Barbadi A, Markeset T (2011) Maintenance cost evaluation of a system to be used in Arctic conditions: a case study. J Qual Maint Eng 17(4):320–336
36. Kim S, Baek JW, Moon SK, Jeon SM (2015) A new approach for product design by integrating assembly and disassembly sequence structure planning. In: Proceedings of the 18th Asia pacific symposium on intelligent and evolutionary systems, proceedings in adaptation, learning and optimization, vol 1. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 247–257. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13359-1_20
37. Kumar VNA, Gandhi OP (2011) Quantification of human error in maintenance using graph theory and matrix approach. Qual Reliab Eng Int 27:1145–1172
38. Lawson B, Krause D, Potter A (2014) Improving supplier new product development performance: the role of supplier development. J Prod Innov Manag. doi:10.1111/jpim.12231
39. Lee J, Ni J, Djurdjanovic D, Qiu H, Liao H (2006) Intelligent prognostics tools and e-maintenance. Comput Ind 57(6):476–489
40. Lee WS, Grosh DL, Tillman FA, Lie CH (1985) Fault tree analysis, methods, and applications: a review. IEEE Trans Reliab 34(3):194–203
41. Yutong LI, Wang Y, Duffy AHB (2014) Computer-based creativity enhanced conceptual design model for non-routine design of mechanical systems. Chin J Mech Eng. doi:10.3901/CJME.2014.0620.117
42. Liao H, Zhao W, Guo H (2006) Predicting remaining useful life of an individual unit using proportional hazards model and logistic regression model. In: IEEE Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, RAMS’06, pp 127–132
43. List D (2001) The consensus group technique in social research. Field Res 13(4):277–290
44. Morita M, Machuca Jose AD, Flynn EJ, Pérez de los Ríos JL (2014) Aligning product characteristics and the supply chain process: a normative perspective. Int J Prod Econ. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.024
45. Nada OA, ElMaraghly HA, ElMaraghly WH (2006) Quality prediction in manufacturing system design. J Manuf Syst 25(3):153–171
46. Paramasivam V, Senthil V (2009) Analysis and evaluation of product design through design aspects using digraph and matrix approach. Int J Interact Des Manuf 3(1):13–23
47. Petersen KJ, Handfield RB, Ragatz GL (2005) Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain. J Oper Manag 22(3–4):371–388
48. Presig HA (2009) A graph-theory-based approach to the analysis of large-scale plants. Comput Chem Eng 33(3):598–604
49. Ribeiro JS, Gomes J, de O (2014) Extending producer responsibility: framework to incorporate life cycle assessment in aircraft preliminary design based on take-back policies. In: IEEE international conference on innovative design and manufacturing, Montreal, 13–15 August 2014
50. Ross PJ (1996) Taguchi techniques for quality engineering, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill, New York
51. Saleh JH, Mark G, Jordan NC (2009) Flexibility: a multi-disciplinary literature review and research agenda for design flexible engineering systems. J Eng Des 20(3):307–323
52. Sanchez R, Mahoney JT (1996) Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strateg Manag J 17(S2):63–76
53. Sapuan SM, Mansor MR (2014) Concurrent engineering approach in the development of composite products: a review. Mater Des 58:161–167. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.059
54. Schilling EG, Neubauer DV (2012) Acceptance sampling in quality control. CRC Press, New York
55. Sehgal R, Gandhi OP, Angra S (2000) Fault location of tribo-mechanical systems: a graph theory and matrix approach. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 70(1):1–14
56. Sharma BC, Gandhi OP (2008) Digraph-based reliability assessment of tribo-pair. Ind Lubr Tribol 60(3):153–163
57. Sheng ILS, Kok-Soo T (2010) Eco-efficient product design using theory of inventive problem solving (TRIZ) principles. Am J Appl Sci 7(6):852–858
58. Simon AT, Di Serio LC, Pires SRI, Martins GS (2014) Evaluating supply chain management: a methodology based on a theoretical model. http://www.anpad.org.br/rac. Accessed 14 Oct 2014
59. Sousa GWL, Carpinetti LCR, Groesbeck RL, Aken EV (2005) Conceptual design of performance measurement and management systems using structured engineering approach. Int J Prod Perform Meas 54(5–6):385–399
60. Taguchi G (1986) Introduction to quality engineering. Asian Productivity Organisation, Tokyo
61. Tan CL, Vonderembs MA (2006) Mediating effects of computer-aided design usage: from concurrent engineering to product development. J Oper Manag 24(5):494–510
62. Tiwari V, Jain PK, Tandon P (2014) Design decision automation support through knowledge template CAD model. Comput Aided Des Appl. doi:10.1080/16864360.2014.949580
63. Tsai YT (2005) The preliminary investigation of system reliability and maintainability to develop availability sound designs. J Eng Des 16(5):459–471
64. Uddin A, Campean IF, Khan MK (2014) Complex product architecture analysis using an integrated approach. In: IOP conference series: material science and engineering, vol 65(1). IOP Publishing
65. Upton DM (1995) What really makes factories flexible? Harv Bus Rev 73(4):74–84
66. Vasantha GVA, Roy R, Lelah A, Brissaud D (2012) A review of product-service systems design methodologies. J Eng Des 23(9):635–659
67. Veryzer RW (1993) Aesthetic response and the influence of design principles on product preferences. Adv Consum Res 20(1):224–228
68. Wang HH, Yang QP (2014) Theoretical framework for innovation design with optimised customization. Appl Mech Mater 599–601:2206–2209
69. Whitney DE (2002) Physical limits to modularity. Working paper series, ESD-WP-2003-01.03, MIT, USA. http://www.aeroinside.com/incidents/type/b788/boeing-787-8-dreamliner. Accessed 11 March 2015