Local Indistinguishability: More Nonlocality with Less Entanglement

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 90, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 4-

  Horodecki, Michał ^a  

^a De), Aditi   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85038292596     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.047902     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. C.H. Bennett, D.P. DiVincenzo, C.A. Fuchs, T. Mor, E. Rains, P.W. Shor, J.A. Smolin, and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A10.1103/PhysRevA.59.1070 59, 1070 (1999).
2. C.H. Bennett, D.P. DiVincenzo, J.A. Smolin, and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A10.1103/PhysRevA.54.3824 54, 3824 (1996).
3. J. Walgate, A.J. Short, L. Hardy, and V. Vedral, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4972 85, 4972 (2000).
4. S. Virmani, M.F. Sacchi, M.B. Plenio, and D. Markham, Phys. Lett. A10.1016/S0375-9601(01)00484-4 288, 62 (2001);
5. Y.-X. Chen and D. Yang, Phys. Rev. A10.1103/PhysRevA.64.064303 64, 064303 (2001);
6. S. VirmaniM.F. SacchiM.B. PlenioD. MarkhamPhys. Lett. A65, 022320 (2002).
7. In this Letter, “distinguishable” (“indistinguishable”) means “locally distinguishable” (“locally indistinguishable”), and we consider only indistinguishability of orthogonal states.
8. J. Walgate and L. Hardy, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.147901 89, 147901 (2002).
9. V. Vedral, M.B. Plenio, M.A. Rippin, and P.L. Knight, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2275 78, 2275 (1997);
10. V. Vedral and M.B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. A10.1103/PhysRevA.57.1619 57, 1619 (1998).
11. G. Vidal, J. Mod. Opt.10.1080/095003400148268 47, 355 (2000).
12. M. Horodecki, Q. Comp. Inf. 1, 7 (2001).
13. B.M. Terhal, D.P. DiVincenzo, and D.W. Leung, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5807 86, 5807 (2001).
14. S. Ghosh, G. Kar, A. Roy, A. Sen(De), and U. Sen, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.277902 87, 277902 (2001).
15. M.A. Nielsen, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.436 83, 436 (1999).
16. G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1046 83, 1046 (1999).
17. D. Jonathan and M.B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1455 83, 1455 (1999).
18. Note that it is not possible to have a complete basis in a tensor product Hilbert space where all but one states are product
19. C.H. Bennett, D.P. DiVincenzo, T. Mor, P.W. Shor, J.A. Smolin, and B.M. Terhal, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.5385 82, 5385 (1999).
20. J.I. Cirac, W. Dür, B. Kraus, and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.544 86, 544 (2001).
21. S. Popescu and D. Rohrlich, Phys. Rev. A 56, R3319 (1997).
22. S. Ghosh, G. Kar, A. Roy, D. Sarkar, A. Sen(De), and U. Sen, Phys. Rev. A10.1103/PhysRevA.65.062307 65, 062307 (2002).
23. K. Życzkowski, P. Horodecki, A. Sanpera, and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. A10.1103/PhysRevA.58.883 58, 883 (1998);
24. K. Życzkowski, Phys. Rev. A10.1103/PhysRevA.60.3496 60, 3496 (1999).
25. J.A. Smolin, Phys. Rev. A10.1103/PhysRevA.63.032306 63, 032306 (2001).
26. M. Horodecki and P. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. A10.1103/PhysRevA.59.4206 59, 4206 (1999).
27. E.M. Rains, Phys. Rev. A10.1103/PhysRevA.60.173 60, 173 (1999).
28. There is a direct, geometrical argument showing that a complete product basis is always probabilistically distinguishable [C.H. Bennett (private communication)].
29. Y.-X. Chen and D. Yang, quant-ph/0204152.
30. D.P. DiVincenzo, T. Mor, P.W. Shor, J.A. Smolin, and B.M. Terhal, quant-ph/9908070.