Hamiltonian embedding of the massive noncommutative U(1) theory

Physical Review D

Volumn 64, Issue 6, 2001, Pages

  Amorim, R ^a   Barcelos Neto, J ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DYNAMICS; EMBEDDING; MACHINE; MAGNETIC FIELD; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICS; PHYSICS;

EID: 85038287641     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.64.065013     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. P. A. M. Dirac, Can. J. Math. 2, 129 (1950);
2. Lectures on Quantum Mechanics (Yeshiva University, New York, 1964).
3. For a review see M. Henneaux, Phys. Rep. C126, 1 (1985).
4. A more complete perspective can be found in M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, Quantization of Gauge Systems (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1992).
5. I. A. Batalin and E. S. Fradkin, Phys. Lett. B 180, 157 (1986);
6. Nucl. Phys. B279, 514 (1987);
7. I. A. Batalin, E. S. Fradkin, and T. E. Fradkina, ibid., Nucl. Phys. B314, 158 (1989);
8. I. A. Batalin, E. S. Fradkin, and T. E. Fradkina, Nucl. Phys. B323, 734 (1989).
9. I. A. Batalin and I. V. Tyutin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 6, 3255 (1991).
10. R. Floreanini and R. Jackiw, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1873 (1987).
11. Y.-G. Miao, J.-G. Zhou, and Y.-Y. Liu, Phys. Lett. B 323, 169 (1994).
12. R. Amorim and J. Barcelos-Neto, Phys. Lett. B 333, 413 (1994);
13. Phys. Rev. D 53, 7129 (1996).
14. R. Amorim and A. Das, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 9, 3543 (1994);
15. R. Amorim, Z. Phys. C 67, 695 (1995).
16. N. Banerjee, R. Banerjee, and S. Ghosh, Nucl. Phys. B417, 257 (1994).
17. R. Banerjee and J. Barcelos-Neto, Nucl. Phys. B499, 453 (1997).
18. M.-I. Park and Y.-J. Park, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A13, 2179 (1998).
19. J. Barcelos-Neto, Phys. Rev. D 55, 2265 (1997).
20. For a review, see N. Seiberg and E. Witten, J. High Energy Phys. 09, 32 (1999), and references therein.
21. N. Seiberg, L. Susskind, and N. Toumbas, J. High Energy Phys. 06, 044 (2000);
22. L. Alvarez-Gaume and J. L. F. Barbon, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16, 1123 (2001).
23. M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5265 (2000).
24. J. M. Garcia-Bondía and C. P. Martin, Phys. Lett. B 479, 321 (2000);
25. F. Ardalan and N. Sadooghi, hep-th/0002143.
26. O. F. Dayi, Phys. Lett. B 481, 408 (2000);
27. M. Hayakawa, ibid., Phys. Lett. B 478, 384 (2000).
28. H. O. Girotti, M. Gomes, V. O. Rivelles, and A. J. da Silva, Nucl. Phys. B587, 299 (2000);
29. M. T. Grisaru and S. Penati, Phys. Lett. B 504, 89 (2001).
30. S. Minwalla, M. V. Raamsdonk, and N. Seiberg, J. High Energy Phys. 02, 020 (2000); M. Hayakawa, hep-th/0009098;
31. I. Y. Aref'eva, D. M. Belov, and A. S. Koshelev, Phys. Lett. B 476, 431 (2000);
32. C. P. Martin and D. Sánchez-Ruiz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 476 (1999);
33. L. Bonora and M. Salizzoni, Phys. Lett. B 504, 80 (2001).
34. J. Gomis and T. Mehen, Nucl. Phys. B591, 263 (2000).
35. H. Arfaei and M. H. Yavartanoo, hep-th/0010244.
36. R. Amorim, N. R. F. Braga, and M. Henneaux, Phys. Lett. B 436, 125 (1998).
37. See, for example, R. Amorim and J. Barcelos-Neto, J. Math. Phys. 40, 585 (1999), and references therein.
38. A general Hamiltonian treatment for noncommutative theories was done in J. Gomis, K. Kamimura, and J. Llosa, Phys. Rev. D 63, 045003 (2001).