Hamiltonian formalism for space-time noncommutative theories

Physical Review D

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2001, Pages

  Gomis, Joaquim ^a,b   Kamimura, Kiyoshi ^c,d   Llosa, Josep ^b  

^a Theory Division   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c Institut de Flsica d'Allés Energies   (Spain)

^d TOHO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; QUANTUM THEORY; SPACE; TIME;

EID: 0035076760     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.63.045003     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. N. Seiberg, L. Susskind, and N. Toumbas, J. High Energy Phys. 06, 044 (2000).
2. L. Alvarez-Gaumé and J. L. F. Barbon, hep-th/0006209.
3. J. Gomis and T. Mehen, Nucl. Phys. B591, 265 (2000).
4. O. Aharony, J. Gomis, and T. Mehen, J. High Energy Phys. 09, 023 (2000).
5. N. Seiberg and E. Willen, J. High Energy Phys. 09, 032 (1999).
6. N. Seiberg, L. Susskind, and N. Toumbas, J. High Energy Phys. 06, 021 (2000).
7. R. Gopakumar, J. Maldacena, S. Minvvalla, and A. Slrominger, J. High Energy Phys. 06, 036 (2000).
8. R. Gopakumar, S. Minwalla, N. Seiberg, and A. Slrominger, J. High Energy Phys. 08, 008 (2000).
9. J. L. F. Barbon and E. Rabinovici, Phys. Leu. B 486, 202 (2000).
10. I. R. Klebanov and'j. Maldacena, hep-th/0006085.
11. From now on when we will refer lo non-local iheories as Ihe ones with an infinite number of time derivatives
12. Non-local Iheories have arisen in a wide variety of physical problems. A very short list should include: A. D. Fokker, Z. Phys. 58, 386 (1929);
13. A. Pais and G. E. Uhlenbeck, Phys. Rev. 79, 145 (1950);
14. P. Kristensen and C. Moller, K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Mat. Fys. Medd. 27, 7 (1952).
15. For a discussion about general aspects of non-local theories see D. A. Eliezer and R. P. Wooddard, Nucl. Phys. B325, 389 (1989).
16. J. Gomis, K. Kamimura, and T. Mateo hep-th/0009158.
17. J. Llosa and J. Vives, J. Math. Phys. 35, 2856 (1994).
18. M. Ostrogradski, Mem. Ac. St. Petersbourg 6, 385 (1850).
19. M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and A. Shirzad, hep-th/9907055.
20. C. Batlle, J. Gomis, J. M. Pons, and N. Roman-Roy, J. Math. Phys. 27, 2953 (1986).
21. The connection with Ostrogradski formalism has also been analyzed in [15] in the context of symplectic mechanics.
22. R. Marnelius, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2535 (1974).
23. L. D. Faddeev, Theor. Math. Phys. l, l (1969).
24. P. Senjanovic, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 100, 227 (1976);
25. 209, 248 (1991).
26. In general the Feynman rules derived from the path integral Lagrangian formalism do not always give the correct Feynman rules; see for example T. D. Lee, Panicle Physics and Introduction to Field Theory (Academic Press, New York, 1981).
27. R. P. Woodard, Phys. Rev. A 62, 052105 (2000).