Transparent, explainable, and accountable AI for robotics

Science Robotics

Volumn 2, Issue 6, 2017, Pages

  Wachter, Sandra ^a   Mittelstadt, Brent ^a,b,c   Floridi, Luciano ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b ALAN TURING INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

REVIEW; ROBOTICS;

EID: 85037720676     PISSN: None     EISSN: 24709476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.aan6080     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. National Science and Technology Council, “Preparing for the future of artificial intelligence” (Executive Office of the President, 2016); https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/whitehouse_files/microsites/ostp/NSTC/preparing_for_the_future_of_ai.pdf.
2. National Science and Technology Council, “The National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan” (Executive Office of the President, 2016); https://www.nitrd.gov/PUBS/national_ai_rd_strategic_plan.pdf.
3. European Parliament, “Civil Law Rules on Robotics - European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL))” (P8_TA-PROV(2017)00 51, European Parliament, 2017); www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+TA+P8-TA-2017-0051+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN.
4. X. Bo, China rolls out three-year program for AI growth. Xinhua News (2016); http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2016-05/23/c_135382029.htm.
5. B. Mittelstadt, P. Allo, M. Taddeo, S. Wachter, L. Floridi, The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data Soc. 3, 10.1177/2053951716679679 (2016).
6. W. F. Taylor, Meeting the equal credit opportunity act’s specificity requirement: Judgmental and statistical scoring systems. Buffalo Law Rev. 29, 73–130 (1980).
7. S. Wachter, B. Mittelstadt, L. Floridi, Why a right to explanation of automated decision-making does not exist in the general data protection regulation. Int. Data Priv. Law (2017); https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2903469).
8. European Parliament Committee on Legal Affairs, “Report with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics” (2015/2103(INL), European Parliament, 2017); www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A8-2017-0005+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN.
9. G.-Z. Yang, J. Cambias, K. Cleary, E. Daimler, J. Drake, P. E. Dupont, N. Hata, P. Kazanzides, S. Martel, R. V. Patel, V. J. Santos, R. H. Taylor, Medical robotics—Regulatory, ethical, and legal considerations for increasing levels of autonomy. Sci. Robot. 2, eaam8638 (2017).
10. M. Jing, Beijing to release national artificial intelligence development plan. (South China Morning Post, 2017); www.scmp.com/tech/article/2078209/beijing-release-national-artificial-intelligence-development-plan.