Unpublished systematic reviews and financial support: A meta-epidemiological study

BMC Research Notes

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Tsujimoto, Hiraku ^a   Tsujimoto, Yasushi ^b,c   Kataoka, Yuki ^a,b  

^a HYOGO PREFECTURAL AMAGASAKI GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c Kyoritsu Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

Dissemination bias; Meta epidemiology; PRISMA; PROSPERO; Publication bias; Registry; Systematic review; Unpublished results

Indexed keywords

EPIDEMIOLOGY; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS;

EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES; FINANCIAL SUPPORT; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 85037667427     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17560500     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13104-017-3043-5     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder J, Sutton AJ, et al. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. Health Technol Assess. 2010;14:1-220.
2. Dickersin K, Min Y, Meinert C. Factors influencing publication of research results. JAMA. 1992;267:374-8.
3. Hopewell S, Loudon K, Clarke MJ, Oxman AD, Dickersin K. Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1:5-8.
4. Simes RJ. Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 1986;4:1529-41.
5. Booth A, Clarke M, Dooley G, Ghersi D, Moher D, Petticrew M, et al. The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2012;1:2.
6. Tricco AC, Pham B, Brehaut J, Tetroe J, Cappelli M, Hopewell S, et al. An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(617-623):e5.
7. Cochrane. Cochrane organisational dashboard 2016. In: 2016 Annual Cochrane Dashboard. 2016. http://community.cochrane.org/sites/default/files/uploads/inlinefiles/2016%20Dashboard%20open%20access.pdf. Accessed 2 Dec 2017.
8. Cochrane Community. Editorial and Publishing Policy Resource. In: PROSPERO. 2016. http://community.cochrane.org/editorial-and-publishing-policy-resource/overview-cochrane-library-andrelated-content/prospero. Accessed 2 Dec 2017.
9. Decullier E, Huot L, Chapuis FR. Fate of protocols submitted to a French national funding scheme: a cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:1-5.
10. Page MJ, Shamseer L, Altman DG, Tetzlaff JM, Sampson M, Tricco AC, et al. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of biomedical research: a cross-sectional study. PLoS Med. 2016;13:e1002028.
11. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.
12. Tsujimoto Y, Tsujimoto H, Kataoka Y, Kimachi M, Shimizu S, Ikenoue T, et al. Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;84:54-60.