Fate of protocols submitted to a French national funding scheme: A cohort study

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2014, Pages

  Decullier, Evelyne ^a,b,c   Huot, Laure ^a,b,c   Chapuis, François R ^a,b,c  

^a HOSPICES CIVILS DE LYON   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COHORT ANALYSIS; FOLLOW UP; FRANCE; HEALTH CARE FINANCING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); ECONOMICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; FINANCING, GOVERNMENT; FRANCE;

EID: 84903640704     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099561     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Dickersin K, Min YI (1993) NIH clinical trials and publication bias. Online J Curr Clin Trials Doc No 50.
2. Druss BG, Marcus SC (2005) Tracking publication outcomes of National Institutes of Health grants. Am J Med 118: 658-663.
3. Neill US, Kosht K (2005) Do you have NIH funding? Then read this. J Clin Invest 115: 1392.
4. (Circulaire du 18 nov. 1992) Appel à candidature relatif à la mise en place d'un programme de recherche clinique dans les hôpitaux (évaluation thérapeutique et diagnostique) financée par la fraction du taux directeur (0.05%) consacré à cet effet.
5. Pico F (1999) Analyse à 6 ans de 168 projets financés dans le cadre du premier Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (PHRC 93): Université Paris XI.
6. Duffet J-P (2001) Rapport d'évaluation du Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique 1994. Ministère de l'emploi et de la solidarité- Ministère délégué à la santé- Paris, France.
7. Duffet J-P (2003) Rapport d'évaluation du Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique 1995. Ministère de la santé, de la famille et des personnes handicapées-Paris, France.
8. Duffet JP (2004) Rapport d'évaluation du Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique 1996. Ministère de la Santé, et de la protection sociale-Paris, France.
9. Decullier E, Chapuis F (2006) Impact of funding on biomedical research: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Public Health 6: 165.
10. Magri M-H, Solari A (1996) The SCI journal citation reports: a potential tool for studying journals. Scientometrics 35: 93-117.
11. Devos P, Lefranc H, Dufresne E, Beuscart R (2006) From bibliometric analysis to research policy: the use of SIGAPS in Lille University Hospital. Stud Health Technol Inform 124: 543-548.
12. Loi nO 2004-806 du 9 aoÛt 2004 relative à la politique de santé publique.
13. Decullier E, Lheritier V, Chapuis F (2005) Fate of biomedical research protocols and publication bias in France: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 331: 19-22.
14. Pich J, Carne X, Arnaiz JA, Gomez B, Trilla A, et al. (2003) Role of a research ethics committee in follow-up and publication of results. Lancet 361: 1015-1016.
15. Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, Matthews DR (1991) Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 337: 867-872.
16. Stern JM, Simes RJ (1997) Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects. BMJ 315: 640-645.
17. Dickersin K, Min YI, Meinert CL (1992) Factors influencing publication of research results. Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards. Jama 267: 374-378.