Metamodels for planar 3r workspace optimization

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2017, Pages 803-812

  Turner, Cameron J ^a  

^a The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; INTERPOLATION; OPTIMIZATION; ROBOTICS; SPLINES;

COMPLEX RELATIONSHIPS; META-MODELING TECHNIQUE; NON-UNIFORM RATIONAL B-SPLINES; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; PERFORMANCE INDICES; RESPONSE SURFACE MODELS; ROBOTIC WORKSPACE;

MACHINE DESIGN;

EID: 85037359519     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/DETC2002/CIE34500     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Barton, R.R., 1994, "Metamodeling: A State-of-the-Art Review," ACM Proc. of the 1994 Winter Simulation Conference, Tew, J.D., et al, eds., pp. 237-44.
2. Barton, R.R., 1998, "Simulation Metamodels," ACM Proc. of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, Medeiros, D.J., et al, eds., pp. 167-74.
3. Berner, D.F. & Snyman, J.A., 1999, "The Influence of Joint Angle Constraints on the Optimum Design of a Planar Robot Manipulator Following a Complicated Prescribed Path," Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 37, pp. 111-24.
4. Crow, E.L., Davis, F.A., & Maxfield, M.W., 1960, Statistics Manual, Dover, New York, NY.
5. Dimas, E., & Briassoulis, D., 1999, "3D Geometric Modeling Based on NURBS: A Review," Advances in Engineering Software, 30, pp. 741-51.
6. Doel, K., & Pai, D., 1996, "Performance Measures for Robot Manipulators: A Unified Approach," The International Journal of Robotics Research, 15, pp. 92-111.
7. Gao, F., & Gruver, W.A., 1997, "Performance Evaluation Criteria for Analysis and Design of Robotic Mechanisms," Proc. of the 1997 IEEE Int'l Conference on Robotics & Automation, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 879-84.
8. Gao, F., Guy, F., & Gruver, W.A., 1997, "Criteria Based Analysis and Design of Three Degree of Freedom Planar Robotic Manipulators," Proc. of the 1997 IEEE Int'l Conference on Robotics & Automation, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 468-73.
9. Gershenfeld, N., 1999, The Nature of Mathematical Modeling, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
10. Gopi, M., & Manohar, S., 1997, "A Unified Architecture for the Computation of B-Spline Curves and Surfaces," IEEE Trans. On Parallel & Distributed Systems, 8, pp. 1275-87.
11. Gosselin, C., & Angeles, J., 1991, "A Global Performance Index for Kinematic Optimization of Robotic Manipulators," ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 113, pp. 220-6.
12. Hussain, M.F., Barton, R.R., & Joshi, S.B., 2002, "Metamodeling: Radial Basis Functions, versus Polynomials," European Journal of Operations Research, 138, pp. 142-54.
13. Kammer, D.C., Alvin, K.A., & Malkus, D.S., 2002, "Combining Metamodels with Rational Function Representations of Discretization Error for Uncertainty Quantification," Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics & Engineering, 191, pp. 1367-79.
14. Kleijnen, J., & Sargent, R.G., 2000, "A Methodology for Fitting & Validating Metamodels in Simulation," European J. of Operations Research, 120, pp. 14-29.
15. Klein, C.A., & Blaho, B.E., 1987, "Dexterity Measures for the Design and Control of Kinematically Redundant Manipulators," The International Journal of Robotics Research, 6, pp. 72-83.
16. Kobbelt, L.P., Botsch, M., Schwanecke, U., & Seidel, H.P., 2001, "Feature Sensitive Feature Extraction from Volume Data," ACM Proc. SIGGRAPH, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 57-66.
17. Legault, J., 2000, "A Complexity Management Framework for Open Architecture Agile Manufacturing Systems," M.S. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
18. McCarthy, J.M., 2000, "Mechanism Synthesis Theory and the Design of Robots," Proc. of the 2000 IEEE Int'l Conference on Robotics & Automation, San Francisco, CA, pp. 55-60.
19. Nash, S.G., & Sofer, A., 1996, Linear and Nonlinear Programming, McGraw Hill, New York, NY.
20. Park, F.C., & Brockett, R.W., 1994, "Kinematic Dexterity of Robot Mechanisms," The International Journal of Robotics Research, 13, pp. 1-15.
21. Piegl, L., 1991, "On NURBS: A Survey," IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, pp. 55-71.
22. Piegl, L., & Tiller, W., 1997, The NURBS Book, 2nd Ed., Springer, Berlin.
23. Piegel, L., & Tiller, W., 1997, "Symbolic Operators for NURBS," Journal of Computer-Aided Design, 29, pp. 361-8.
24. Rogers, D.F., & Adams, J.A., 1990, Mathematical Elements of Computer Graphics, 2nd Ed., McGraw Hill, New York, NY.
25. Shyy, W., Papila, N., Vaidyanathan, R., & Tucker, K., 2001, "Global Design Optimization for Aerodynamics and Rocket Propulsion Components," Progress in Aerospace Science, 37, pp. 59-118.
26. Simpson, T.W., Peplinski, J.D., Koch, P.N., & Allen, J.K., 1997, "On the Use of Statistics in Design and the Implication for Deterministic Computer Experiments," ASME 1997 Design and Engineering Technical Conferences, DTM-3881, pp. 1-12.
27. Simpson, T.W., Peplinski, J.D., Koch, P.N., & Allen, J.K., 2001, "Metamodels for Computer-based Engineering Design: Survey and Recommendations," Engineering with Computers, 17, pp. 129-50.
28. Turner, C., 2000, "Criteria Development for Actuator Resource Management," M.S. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
29. Vijaykumar, R., Waldron, K.J., & Tsai, M.J., 1986, "Geometric of Serial Chain Manipulators for Working Volume and Dexterity," The International Journal of Robotics Research, 5, pp. 91-103.
30. Wang, N., & Ge, P., 1999, "Study of Metamodeling Techniques and Their Applications in Engineering Design," ASME-MED Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 10, pp. 89-95.
31. Wang, T., & Wu, K., 1999, "A Parallel Set Design Proceedure for the Simulated Annealing Algorithm Under Computational Time Constraints," Computers and Operations Research, 26, pp. 665-78.
32. Wu, A., Wu, K.Y., Chen, R.M.M., & Shen, Y., 1998, "Parallel Optimal Statistical Design Method With Response Surface Modeling Using Genetic Algorithms," IEE Proc. Circuit Device Systems, 145, pp. 7-12.
33. Yoshikawa, T., 1985, "Manipulability of Robotic Mechanisms," The International Journal of Robotics Research, 3, pp. 3-9.