Nominal expressions in multilingual corpora: Definites and demonstratives

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2002

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 1627-1634

  Salmon Alt, Susanne ^a   Vieira, Renata ^b  

^a ATILF   (France)

^b UNIVERSIDADE DO VALE DO RIO DOS SINOS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

DEFINITE DESCRIPTIONS; NOUN PHRASE; PARALLEL CORPORA;

LINGUISTICS;

EID: 85037137716     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Alshawi, H., 1990. Resolving Quasi Logical Forms. Computational Linguistics, 16(3):133-144.
2. Aone, C. and Bennet, S. W., 1995. Automated acquisition of anaphora resolution strategies. Proc. AAAI Spring Symposium on Empirical Methods in Discourse Interpretation and Generation, 1-7, Stanford.
3. Appelt, D., et al. 1995. SRI International FASTUS system MUC-6 test results and analysis. Proc. of the 6thMessage Understanding Conference, 237-248. Columbia.
4. Ariel, M., 1990. Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. Routledge, London and New York.
5. Azzam, S., Humphreys, K. and Gaizauskas, R. 1998. Coreference Resolution in a Multilingual Information Extraction System. In Proc. of the 1st Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), Linguistic Coreference Workshop.
6. Bosch, P. and Geurts, B., 1990. Processing definite NPs. Rivista di Linguistica, 2(1):178-199.
7. Burger, J. D. and Connolly, D., 1992. Probabilistic resolution of anaphoric reference. Proc. AAAI Fall Symposium on Probabilistic Approaches to Natural Language, 17-24, Cambridge.
8. Byron, D. and Allen, J., 1998. Resolving demonstrative anaphora in the TRAINS93 corpus. Proc. Discourse, Anaphora and Reference Resolution Colloquium. Lancaster.
9. Carbonell, J.G. and Brown, R.D., 1988. Anaphora Resolution: A Multi-Strategy Approach. Proc of the 12th International Joint Conference on Computational Linguistics, 96-101.
10. Carletta, J., 1996. Assessing agreement on classification tasks: The Kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics, 22(2):249-254.
11. Carter, D.M., 1987. Interpreting Anaphors in Natural Language Texts. Chichester, UK, Ellis Horwood.
12. Chinchor, N. A. and Sundheim, B., 1995. Message Understanding Conference (MUC) tests of discourse processing. Proc. AAAI Spring Symposium on Empirical Methods in Discourse Interpretation and Generation, 21-26, Stanford.
13. Chinchor, N. and Hirschman, L., 1997. MUC-7 Coreference Task definition, Version 3.0. Proc. of the 7th Message Understanding Conference MUC-7, 1997.
14. Clark, H. H., 1977. Bridging. In Johnson-Laird, P.N. and Wason P.C. (eds.) Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science. London New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Corblin, F., 1987. Indéfini, Défini et Démonstratif. Droz, Genève.
16. Fraurud, K. 1990. Definiteness and the Processing of Noun Phrases in Natural Discourse. Journal of Semantics (7) 395-433.
17. Garside, R., Fligelstone, S. and Botley, S. 1997. Discourse annotation: Anaphoric relations in corpora, In: Garside, R., Leech, G. and McEnery, A. Corpus annotation: linguistic information from computer text corpora, Longman, Londres-Nova Iorque, pp. 66-84.
18. Grosz, B.J., Joshi, A.K. and Weinstein, S., 1995. Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(2):203-225.
19. Gundel, J., Hedberg, N.A. and Zacharski, R., 1993. Giveness, Implicature and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69(2):275-307.
20. Harabagiu, S. M. and Maiorano, S. J. 2000. Multilingual Coreference Resolution, in Proc. of the Language Technology Joint Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing ANLP-NAACL2000, Seattle WA.
21. Hawkins, J.A. 1978. Definiteness and Indefiniteness: A study in reference and grammaticality prediction. London: Croom Helm.
22. Isard, A., McKelvie, D., Mengel, A., Moller, B. M., 2000. The MATE Workbench Annotation Tool, a Technical Description. Proc. of LREC 2000, Athens.
23. Lappin, S. and Leass, H., 1994. An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution. Computational Linguistics, 20(4) 535-561.
24. Löbner, S., 1985. Definites. Journal of Semantics, 4:279- 326.
25. Mitkov, R. and Barbu, C. 2000. Mutual enhancement of performance: bilingual pronoun resolution for English and French. Proc. Discourse, Anaphora and Reference Resolution Conference. Lancaster.
26. Mitkov, R., Evans, R., Orasan, C., Barbu, C., Jones, L., Sotirova, V. 2000. Coreference and anaphora: developing annotating tools, annotated resources and annotation strategies. Proc. Discourse, Anaphora and Reference Resolution Conference. Lancaster.
27. Müller C., Strube M., 2001. Annotating anaphoric and bridging relation with MMAX. Proc. of the 2nd IJCAI Workshop on Knowledge and Reasoning in Pratical Dialogue Systems, 45-50, Seattle, 5 Aug.
28. Poesio, M. 2000. Coreference. MATE Dialogue Annotation Guidelines Deliverable D2.1, 126- 182. www.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/projekte/mate/mdag/.
29. Poesio, M., and Vieira, R., 1998. A corpus-based investigation of Definite Description Use. Computational Linguistics, 24(2):183-216.
30. Prince, E.F., 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole, ed., Radical Pragmatics. Academic Press, New York, 223-256.
31. Prince, E.F., 1992. The {ZPG} letter: subjects, definiteness, and information status. In Thompson, S. and Mann, W. (eds.) Discourse description: diverse analyses of a fund-raising text. J. Benjamins, 295-325.
32. Rossi, D., Pinheiro, C., Feier, N. and Vieira, R., 2001. Resolução de correferência em textos da língua portuguesa. REIC. 1(2) www.sbc.org.br/reic.
33. Sant'Anna, V. and Lima, V. L. S., 2001. Cálculo de referências anafóricas pronominais demonstrativas na língua portuguesa escrita. In Anais do XXI Congresso da Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, Fortaleza-CE.
34. Sidner, C. L., 1978. The use of focus as a tool for disambiguation of definite noun phrases. In Waltz, D. L. (Ed.), Theoretical issues in natural language processing -2. University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, 25-27, July.
35. Strand, K., 1996. A Taxonomy of Linking Relations. Indi Ana Workshop, Lancaster, July 19th 1996.
36. van Deemter, K., Kibble, R., 2000. On Coreferring: Coreference in MUC and related annotation schemes. Computational Linguistics 26(4).
37. Vieira, R., and Teufel, S., 1997. Towards Resolution of Bridging Descriptions. Proc of the 35th International Joint Conference on Computational Linguistics, Madrid, July, 7-12.
38. Vieira, R., and Poesio, M., 2000. An Empirically-Based System for Processing Definite Descriptions, Computational Linguistics, 26(4):525-579.
39. Vieira, R., Salmon-Alt, S. and Schang, E., 2002. Multilingual Corpora Annotation for Processing Definite Descriptions, Proc. Portugal for Natural Language Processing Portal, Universidade do Algarve, Faro, Portugal, June 23- 26.