Towards semi-automated annotation for prepositional phrase attachment

Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 2486-2490

  Rosenthal, Sara ^a   Lipovsky, William J ^a   McKeown, Kathleen ^a   Thadani, Kapil ^a   Andreas, Jacob ^a  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIGH-PRECISION; HUMAN VOLUNTEERS; MECHANICAL TURKS; PREPOSITIONAL PHRASE; SEMANTIC DISAMBIGUATION; SYNTACTIC ANNOTATION; TRAINING CORPUS; WALL STREET JOURNAL;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 85037116265     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Eneko Agirre, Timothy Baldwin, and David Martinez. 2008. Improving parsing and PP attachment performance with sense information. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 317-325, June.
2. Michaela Atterer and Hinrich Schütze. 2007. Prepositional phrase attachment without oracles. Computational Linguistics, 33(4):469-476.
3. Eric Brill. 1995. Transformation-based error-driven learning and natural language processing: a case study in part-of-speech tagging. Computational Linguistics, 21(4):543-565.
4. Eugene Charniak. 2000. A maximum-entropy-inspired parser. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 132-139.
5. Michael Collins. 2003. Head-driven statistical models for natural language parsing. Computational Linguistics, 29(4):589-637.
6. Daniel Gruhl, R. Guha, David Liben-Nowell, and Andrew Tomkins. 2004. Information diffusion through blogspace. In www '04: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 491-501.
7. Liangjie Hong and Brian D. Davison. 2009. A classification-based approach to question answering in discussion boards. In SIGIR '09: Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 171-178.
8. Gilly Leshed and Joseph 'Jofish' Kaye. 2006. Understanding how bloggers feel: recognizing affect in blog posts. In CHI '06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 1019-1024.
9. Mitchell P. Marcus, Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz, and Beatrice Santorini. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of english: the Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
10. Adam Meyers, Ruth Reeves, Catherine Macleod, Rachel Szekely, Veronika Zielinska, Brian Young, and Ralph Grishman. 2004. The nombank project: An interim report. In Adam Meyers, editor, Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL Workshop on Frontiers in Corpus Annotation, pages 24-31, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, May.
11. Martha Palmer, Daniel Gildea, and Paul Kingsbury. 2005. The Proposition Bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 31(1):71-106.
12. Sameer S. Pradhan and Nianwen Xue. 2009. Ontonotes: the 90% solution. In Proceedings of NAACL, pages 11-12.
13. Adwait Ratnaparkhi, Jeff Reynar, and Salim Roukos. 1994. A maximum entropy model for prepositional phrase attachment. In Proceedings of HLT, pages 250-255.
14. Rion Snow, Brendan O'Connor, Daniel Jurafsky, and Andrew Y. Ng. 2008. Cheap and fast - but is it good?: evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pages 254-263.
15. Jiri Stetina and Makoto Nagao. 1997. Corpus based pp attachment ambiguity resolution with a semantic dictionary. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Very Large Corpora, pages 66-80.
16. Erik F. Tjong Kim Sang and Sabine Buchholz. 2000. Introduction to the CoNLL-2000 shared task: chunking. In Proceedings of the CoNLL workshop on Learning Language in Logic, pages 127-132.
17. Alexander S. Yeh and Marc B. Vilain. 1998. Some properties of preposition and subordinate conjunction attachments. In Proceedings of COLING, pages 1436-1442.
18. Jakub Zavrel, Walter Daelemans, and Jorn Veenstra. 1997. Resolving PP attachment ambiguities with memory-based learning. In Proc. of the Workshop on Computational Language Learning (CoNLL'97), ACL, pages 136-144.