Prepositional phrase attachment without oracles

Computational Linguistics

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 469-476

  Atterer, Michaela ^a   Schütze, Hinrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES; GOLD STANDARDS; INTEGRAL COMPONENTS; PARSE TREES; PREPOSITIONAL PHRASE;

EID: 37249069346     PISSN: 08912017     EISSN: 15309312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/coli.2007.33.4.469     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Atterer, Michaela and Hinrich Schütze. 2006. The effect of corpus size in combining supervised and unsupervised training for disambiguation. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the International Committee on Computational Linguistics and the Association for Computational Linguistics (COLING/ACL 2006) Main Conference Poster Sessions, pages 25-32, Sydney, Australia.
2. Bharati, Akshar, U. Rohini, P.Vishnu, Sushma Bendre, and Rajeev Sangal. 2005. A hybrid approach to single and multiple PP attachment using WordNet. In Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (IJCNLP) 2005, pages 211-222, Jeju Island, Korea.
3. Bikel, Daniel M. 2004. Intricacies of Collins parsing model. Computational Linguistics, 30(4):479-512.
4. Calvo, Hiram, Alexander Gelbukh, and Adam Kilgarriff. 2005. Distributional thesaurus vs. WordNet: A comparison of backoff techniques for unsupervised PP attachment. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (CICLing-2005), pages 177-188, Mexico City, Mexico.
5. Charniak, Eugene and Mark Johnson. 2005. Coarse-to-fine n-best parsing and MaxEnt discriminative reranking. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 173-180, Ann Arbor, MI.
6. Collins, Michael and James Brooks. 1995. Prepositional phrase attachment through a backed-off model. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Very Large Corpora, pages 27-38, Somerset, NJ.
7. Collins, Michael and Terry Koo. 2005. Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. Computational Linguistics, 31(1):25-70.
8. Foth, Kilian A. and Wolfgang Menzel. 2006. The benefit of stochastic PP attachment to a rule-based parser. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the International Committee on Computational Linguistics and the Association for Computational Linguistics (COLING/ACL) 2006 Main Conference Poster Sessions, pages 223-230, Sydney, Australia.
9. Hindle, Donald and Mats Rooth. 1993. Structural ambiguity and lexical relations. Computational Linguistics, 19(1):103-120.
10. Merlo, Paola and Eva Esteve Ferrer. 2006. The notion of argument in prepositional phrase attachment. Computational Linguistics, 32(3):341-378.
11. Mitchell, Brian. 2004. Prepositional Phrase Attachment using Machine Learning Algorithms. Ph.D. thesis, Natural Language Processing Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, UK.
12. Olteanu, Marian and Dan Moldovan. 2005. PP-attachment disambiguation using large context. In Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference/Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP), pages 273-280, Vancouver, Canada.
13. Olteanu, Marian G. 2004. Prepositional phrase attachment ambiguity resolution through a rich syntactic, lexical and semantic set of features applied in support vector machines learner. Masters thesis, University of Texas, Dallas.
14. Pantel, Patrick and Dekang Lin. 2000. An unsupervised approach to prepositional phrase attachment using contextually similar words. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 101-108, Hong Kong, China.
15. Ratnaparkhi, Adwait. 1998. Unsupervised statistical models for prepositional phrase attachment. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the Association for Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL98), pages 1079-1085, Montreal, Canada.
16. Ratnaparkhi, Adwait, Jeff Reynar, and Salim Roukos. 1994. A maximum entropy model for prepositional phrase attachment. In Workshop on Human Language Technology, pages 250-255, Plainsboro, NJ.
17. Srinivas, Medimi and Pushpak Bhattacharyya. 2007. A flexible unsupervised PP-attachment method using semantic information. In Proceedings of Internationl Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2007), pages 1677-1682, Hyderabad, India.
18. Stetina, Jiri and Makoto Nagao. 1997. Corpus based PP attachment ambiguity resolution with a semantic dictionary. In Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Very Large Corpora, pages 66-80, Hong Kong, China.
19. Toutanova, Kristina, Christopher D. Manning, and Andrew Y. Ng. 2004. Learning random walk models for inducing word dependency distributions. In Proceedings of the Twenty-first International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML '04), pages 815-822, Banff, Alberta, Canada.
20. Volk, Martin. 2006. How bad is the problem of PP-attachment? A comparison of English, German and Swedish. In Proceedings of Association for Computational Linguistics - Special Interest Group on Computational Semantics (ACL-SIGSEM) Workshop on Prepositions, pages 81-88, Trento, Italy.