Cognitive evaluation approach for a controlled language post-editing experiment

Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 3485-3490

  Temnikova, Irina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; COMPUTER AIDED LANGUAGE TRANSLATION; ERRORS;

AUTOMATIC EVALUATION; COGNITIVE EFFORTS; CRISIS MANAGEMENT; EMERGENCY SITUATION; ERROR CLASSIFICATION; EVALUATION APPROACH; HUMAN COMPREHENSIONS; MACHINE TRANSLATIONS;

TRANSLATION (LANGUAGES);

EID: 85037109770     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Aikawa, T. et al. (2007). "Impact of Controlled Language on Translation Quality and Post-Editing in a Statistical Machine Translation Environment". In Proceedings of the MT Summit XI. Copenhagen, Denmark, 10-14 September. 1-7.
2. Allen, J.: 2001, 'Post-Editing: An Integrated Part of a Translation Software Program'. Language International, April 2001, pp. 26-29.
3. Allen, J. (2002). Repairing Texts: Empirical Investigations of Machine Translation Post-Editing Processes, book review, Multilingual Computing&Technology, 13.2, March 2002, 27-29.
4. Arnold, D. et al. Machine Translation. An Introductory Guide. Blackwells-NCC, London, 1993.
5. Baddeley, A.D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). New York: Academic Press.
6. Harley, T.A., (2008). The Psychology of the Language: from data to theory, Psychology Press, Hove and New York.
7. Larigauderie P, Gaonac'h D, Lacroix N. Working memory and error detection in texts: what are the roles of the central executive and the phonological loop? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1998, 12: 505-527.
8. Levenshtein, V.I., (1966). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady 10:707-710.
9. Krings, H.P. (2001). Repairing Texts: Empirical Investigations of Machine Translation Post-Editing Processes. Koby, G.S. (ed.). Kent, Ohio: The Kent State University.
10. Marslen-Wilson, W. (1990). Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In G. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive Models of speech processing, pp. 148-172. Cambridge: MIT Press.
11. Mitamura, T. and Nyberg, E. (2002) Automatic rewriting for controlled language translation. NLPRS 2002 Workshop on Automatic Paraphrasing: Theories and Applications.
12. Muegge, U. (2006), "Fully automatic high quality machine translation of restricted text: A case study", Proceedings of the twenty-eighth international conference on translating and the computer, 16-17 November 2006, London: Aslib, pp. 16-17.
13. Murphy, D., (2000). Keeping translation technology under control. In: Machine Translation Review, issue 11: December 2000; pp. 11-13.
14. Nyberg E., Mitamura T. & Huijsen, W.O., (2003). Controlled language for authoring and translation. In: Harold Somers (ed.) Computers and translation: a translator's guide (Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2003); pp. 245-281.
15. O'Brien, S. (2005). 'Methodologies for Measuring the Correlations between Post-Editing Effort and Machine Text Translatability'. Machine Translation. Vol. 19, No 1. pp. 37-58.
16. O'Brien, S. (2006). Controlled Language and Post-Editing. Multilingual, Issue 83, pp. 17-19.
17. Ogden, Ch. K. (1930) Basic English: a general introduction with rules and grammar, London, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.
18. Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., and Zhu, W. J. (2002). "BLEU: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation" in ACL-2002: 40th Annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics pp. 311-318.
19. Ruffino, J.R. (1982). Coping with machine translation. In: Lawson (1982), 57-60.
20. Schäfner, F. (2003), "MT post-editing: How to shed light on the "unknown task". Experiences made at SAP", Joint Conference combining the 8th International Workshop of the European Association for Machine Translation and the 4th Controlled Language Applications Workshop, 15-17 May 2003, Dublin City University.
21. Snover, M., Madnani, N., Dorr B. and Schwartz, R. "Fluency, Adequacy, or HTER? Exploring Different Human Judgments with a Tunable MT Metric," in Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation at the 12th Meeting of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL-2009), 2009.
22. Streiff, A.A. (1985). New developments in TITUS 4. In: Lawson (1985), 185-192.
23. Temnikova, I. and Margova, R. (2009). Towards a Controlled Language in Crisis Management: The Case of Bulgarian. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Data and Sense Mining, Machine Translation and Controlled Languages (ISMTCL), Besancon, France, July 1-3, 2009.
24. Temnikova, I. and Orasan, C. (2009). Post-editing Experiments with MT for a Controlled Language. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Data and Sense Mining, Machine Translation and Controlled Languages (ISMTCL), Besancon, France, July 1-3.
25. Vilar, D., Xu, J., D'Haro, L., Ney, H. (2006). Error analysis of statistical machine translation output. 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC'06, pp. 697-702.
26. Wagner, E. "Post-editing Systran - A Challenge for Commission Translators", Terminologie & Traduction, 1985-3.