From sentence to discourse: Building an annotation scheme for discourse based on Prague Dependency Treebank

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 2564-2570

  Mladová, Lucie ^a   Zikánová, Šárka ^a   Hajičová, Eva ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SEMANTICS;

ANNOTATION SCHEME; CORPUS ANNOTATIONS; PRAGUE DEPENDENCY TREEBANK; SENTENCE BOUNDARIES; TREEBANKS;

FORESTRY;

EID: 85037107062     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Asher, N. (1993). Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
2. Hajič, J. et al. (2006). Prague Dependency Treebank 2.0. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia.
3. Hajičová, E. (1993). Issues of Sentence Structure and Discourse Patterns. Charles University, Prague.
4. Hajičová, E. et al. (2006). An Annotated Corpus as a Test Bed for Discourse Structure Analysis. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Constraints in Discourse, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Ireland, pp. 82-89.
5. Joshi, A. et al. (2006). Discourse Annotation: Discourse Connectives and Discourse Relations. Tutorial at the Association for Computational Linguistics, Sydney.
6. Lee, A. et al. (2006). Complexity of Dependencies in Discourse: Are Dependencies in Discourse More Complex Than in Syntax? Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories. Prague, Czech Republic
7. Mikulová, M. et al. (2005). Annotation on the Tectogrammatical Layer in the Prague Dependency Treebank: Annotation Manual. Universitas Carolina Pragensis, Prague.
8. Miltsakaki, E. et al. (2004). The Penn Discourse Treebank. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. LREC 2004, Lisbon, Portugal.
9. Mladová, L. (2008). Diskurzní vztahy v češtine a jejich zachycení v anotovaném korpusu. [Discourse Relations in Czech and their Representation in an Annotated Corpus of Texts.] Diploma thesis. Charles University, Prague.
10. Nedoluzhko, A. (2007). Zpráva k anotování rozšírené textové koreference a bridging vztahu v Pražském závislostním korpusu. [Report about the Annotation of the Extended Text-Coreference and Bridging Relations in the Prague Dependency Treebank.] Technical report. Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics, Charles University, Prague.
11. Sgall, P. et al. (1969). A Functional Approach to Syntax in Generative Description of Language. American Elsevier, New York.
12. The Penn Discourse Treebank 1.0 Annotation Manual. (2006). http://www.seas.upenn. edu/~pdtb/papers/pdtb-1.0-annotation-manual.pdf
13. The Penn Discourse Treebank 2.0 Annotation Manual. (2007). http://www.seas.upenn. edu/~pdtb/PDTBAPI/pdtb-annotation-manual.pdf
14. The Prague Czech-English Dependency Treebank 1.0 http://ufal.mff.cuni.cz/pcedt/doc/PCE DT-main. html
15. Webber, B. (2004). D-LTAG: Extending Lexicalized TAG to Discourse. Cognitive Science, 28(5), pp. 751-779.
16. Zikánová, Š. (2007). Possibilities of Discourse Annotation in Prague Dependency Treebank (Based on the Penn Discourse Treebank Annotation). Technical report. Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics, Charles University, Prague.