Automatic assignment of grammatical relations

2nd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2000

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages

  Lesmo, Leonardo ^a,b   Lombardo, Vincenzo ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN PIEDMONT   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

AUTOMATIC ASSIGNMENT; GRAMMATICAL RELATIONS; HEURISTIC KNOWLEDGE; KNOWLEDGE BASE; SEMANTIC CUES; SENTENCE STRUCTURES; SUBCATEGORIZATION; UNDERSPECIFICATION;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 85037088153     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Boella G., Lesmo L., (1998) Automatic Refinement of Linguistic Rules for Tagging. In Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 98), Granada, pp. 923-930.
2. Brants, T., Skut, W., Uszkoreit, H., (1999) Syntactic annotation of a German newspaper corpus. In Proceedings of Treebanks workshop - Journées ATALA sur les corpus annotés pour la syntaxe, 18-19 juin 1999, Paris, pp. 69-76.
3. Brants T., Skut W., (1998) Automation of Treebank Annotation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Methods in Language Processing (NeMLaP-3) January 14-17, 1998, Sidney, Australia, pp. 49-58.
4. Brants T., Skut W., Krenn B., (1997) Tagging Grammatical Functions. In Proceedings of EMNLP-97, 1997, Providence, RI, USA, pp. 64-74.
5. Buchholz S., (1998) Distinguishing Complements from Adjuncts using Memory-based Learning. Proc. ESSLLI-98 Workshop on Automated Acquisition of Syntax and Parsing, Saarbruecken, Germany.
6. Buchholz S., Veenstra J., Daelemans W.: Cascaded Grammatical Relation Assignment. EMNLP/VLC-99, University of Maryland, USA, June 21-22, 1999. CL/9906004.
7. Collins M.: Three Generative, Lexicalized Models for Statistical Parsing. In Proceedings of the 35th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 97) (1997), 16-23.
8. Ferro L., Vilain M., Yeh A.: Learning Transformation Rules to find Grammatical Relations. Workshop on Computational Natural Language Learning (GNLL-99) (1999), 43-52.
9. Hajic J., (1998) Building a Syntactically Annotated Corpus: the Prague Dependency Treebank In Issues of Valency and Meaning, Karolinum, Praha, pp. 106-132.
10. Hudson R., (1990) English word grammar. Basil Blackwell, Oxford and Cambridge, MA.
11. Lombardo V., Lesmo L., (in press) A formal theory of dependency syntax with non-lexical units. To appear in Traitement Automatique des Langues.
12. Mel'cuk I.: Dependency syntax: theory and practice, SUNY University Press, 1988.
13. Marcus M. P., Santorini B., Marcinkiewicz M. A., (1993) Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank, Computational Linguistics, 19, pp. 313-330.
14. Marcus M. P., Kim G., Marcinkiewicz M. A., et al., (1994) The Penn Treebank: Annotating Predicate Argument Structure. In Proceedings of The Human Language Technology Workshop, San Francisco, Morgan-Kaufmann.
15. Moreno, A., Lopez, S., (1999) Developing a Spanish treebank. In Proceedings of Treebanks workshop - Journées ATALA sur les corpus annotés pour la syntaxe, 18-19 juin 1999, Paris, pp. 51-58.
16. Skut W., Krenn B., Brants T., Uszkoreit H., (1997) An Annotation Scheme for Free Word Order Languages. In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing (ANLP), Washington, D. C..
17. Skut W., Brants T., Krenn B., Uszkoreit H., (1998) A Linguistically Interpreted Corpus of German in Newspaper Texts. In Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Language Resources and Evolution (LREC 98), Granada, pp. 705-713.
18. Stock, O., (1989) Parsing with Flexibility, Dynamic Strategies, and Idioms in Mind. Computational Linguistics, Vol. 15, Num.1, March 1989, pp. 1-17.
19. Vilain M., (1999) Inferential Information Extraction, in M. T. Pazienza (ed.), Information Extraction, LNAI 1714, Springer, pp. 95-119.