Learning Transformation Rules to Find Grammatical Relations

CoNLL 1999 - Computational Natural Language Learning, Held in cooperation with 9th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, EACL 1999 - Proceedings of a Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 1999, Pages 43-52

  Ferro, Lisa ^a   Vilain, Marc ^a   Yeh, Alexander ^a  

^a MITRE CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; SYNTACTICS;

CORE SYNTAX; ERROR-DRIVEN LEARNING; F-SCORE; GRAMMATICAL RELATIONS; TEST SETS; TRAINING SETS; TRANSFORMATION ERRORS; TRANSFORMATION RULES; TRANSFORMATION SEQUENCES;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 26944500707     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. [Abney, 1996] S. Abney. Partial parsing via finite-state cascades. In Proc. of ESSLI96 Workshop on Robust Parsing, 1996.
2. [Appelt et al. 1993] D. Appelt, J. Hobbs, J. Bear. D. Israel, and M. Tyson. Fastus: A finite-state processor for information extraction. In 13th Intl. Conf. On Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-93), 1993.
3. [Argamon et al., 1998]- S. Argamon, I. Dagan, and Y. Krymolowski. A memory-based approach to learning shallow natural language patterns. In COLING-ACL'98, pages 67-73, Montréal, Canada, 1998. An expanded 1999 version will appear in JETAI.
4. [Brill and Resnik, 1994] E. Brill and P. Resnik. A rule-based approach to prepositional phrase attachment disambiguation. In 15th International Conf. on Computational Linguistics (COLING). 1994.
5. [Brill. 1993] E. Brill. A Corpus-based Approach to Language Learning. PhD thesis. U. Pennsylvania, 1993.
6. [Briscoe et al.,] T. Briscoe, J. Carroll. G. Carroll, S. Federici, G. Grefenstette, S. Montemagni, V. Pirrelli. I. Prodanof, M. Rooth, and M. Vannocchi. Phrasal parser software - deliverable 3.1. Available at http://www.ilc.pi.cnr.it/sparkle/sparkle.htm.
7. [Broker, 1998] N. Broker. Separating surface order and syntactic relations in a dependency grammar. In COLING-ACL'98, pages 174-180, Montréal, Canada. 1998.
8. [Carroll et al, 1997a] J. Carroll, T. Briscoe, N. Calzolari, S. Federici, S. Montemagni, Y. Pirrelli, G. Grefenstette, A. Sanfilippo, G. Carroll, and M. Rooth. Sparkle work package 1, specification of phrasal parsing, final report. Available at http://www.ilc.pi.cnr.it/sparkle/sparkle.htm, November 1997.
9. [Carroll et al, 1997b] J. Carroll, T. Briscoe, G. Carroll, M. Light, D. Prescher. M. Rooth, S. Federici, S. Montemagni, V. Pirrelli, I. Prodanof, and M. Vannocchi. Sparkle work package 3, phrasal parsing software, deliverable d3.2. Available at http://www.ilc.pi.cnr.it/sparkle/sparkle.htm, November 1997.
10. [Carroll et al., 1998a] J. Carroll, T. Briscoe, and A. Sanfilippo. Parser evaluation: a survey and a new proposal. In 1st Intl. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pages 447-454, Granada, Spain, 1998.
11. [Carroll et al., 1998b] J. Carroll, G. Minnen, and T. Briscoe. Can subcategorisation probabilities help a statistical parser? In 6th ACL/SIGDAT workshop on Very Large Corpora, Montréal, Canada, 1998.
12. [Carroll et al, 1999] J. Carroll, G. Minnen, and T. Briscoe. Corpus annotation for parser evaluation. In To appear in the EACL99 workshop on Linguistically Interpreted Corpora (LINC'99), 1999.
13. [Charniak, 1997] E. Charniak. Statistical techniques for natural language parsing. AI magazine, 18(4):33-43, 1997.
14. [Chomsky, 1965] N. Chomsky. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1965.
15. [Collins, 1997] M. Collins. Three generative, Iexicalized models for statistical parsing. In Proceedings of ACL/EACL97. 1997.
16. [Def, 1995] Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. Proc. 6th Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6), November 1995.
17. [Ferro, 1998] L. Ferro. Guidelines for annotating grammatical relations. Unpublished annotation guidelines, 1998.
18. [Kaplan, 1994] R. Kaplan. The formal architecture of lexical-functional grammar. In M. Dalrymple, R. Kaplan, J. Maxwell III, and A. Zaenen, editors. Formal issues in lexical-functional grammar. Stanford University. 1994.
19. [Lai and Huang, 1998] T. B.Y. Lai and C. Huang. Complements and adjuncts in dependency grammar parsing emulated by a constrained context-free grammar. In COLING-ACL'98 Workshop: Processing of Dependency-based Grammars, Montréal, Canada, 1998.
20. [Marcus et al, 1993] M. Marcus, B. Santorini, and M. Marcinkiewicz. Building a large annotated corpus of english: the penn treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2), 1993.
21. [Miller. 1990] G. Miller. Wordnet: an on-line lexical database. Intl. J. of Lexicography, 3(4). 1990.
22. [Palmer et al, 1993] M. Palmer, R. Passonneau, C. Weir, and T. Finin. The kernel text understanding system. Artificial Intelligence, 63:17-68, 1993.
23. [Palmer, 1997] D. Palmer. A trainable rule-based algorithm for word segmentation. In Proceedings of ACL/EACL97, 1997.
24. [Perlmutter, 1983] D. Perlmutter. Studies in Relational Grammar 1. U. Chicago Press, 1983.
25. [Ramshaw and Marcus, 1995] L. Ramshaw and M. Marcus. Text chunking using transformation-based learning. In Proc. of the 3rd Workshop on Very Large Corpora, pages 82-94. Cambridge. MA. USA. 1995.
26. [Wolff et al, 1995] S. Wolff, C. Macleod, and A. Meyers. Comlex Word Classes. CS. Dept., New York U. Feb. 1995. prepared for the Linguistic Data Consortium, U. Pennsylvania.
27. [Yeh and Vilain, 1998] A. Yeh and M. Vilain. Some properties of preposition and subordinate conjunction attachments. In COLIN G-ACL'98, pages 1436-1442, Montréal, Canada. 1998.