Risk prediction with electronic health records: The importance of model validation and clinical context

JAMA Cardiology

Volumn 1, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 976-977

  Goldstein, Benjamin A ^a,b   Navar, Ann Marie ^a,b   Pencina, Michael J ^a,b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DATA ANALYSIS; EDITORIAL; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PREDICTION; PRIMARY PREVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PREDICTION; SCORING SYSTEM; VALIDATION STUDY;

EID: 85037072890     PISSN: 23806583     EISSN: 23806591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.3826     Document Type: Editorial

References (9)

1. Hordijk-Trion M, Lenzen M, Wijns W, et al; EHS-CR Investigators. Patients enrolled in coronary intervention trials are not representative of patients in clinical practice: results from the Euro Heart Survey on Coronary Revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(6):671-678.
2. Goff DC Jr, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, et al; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014; 129(25)(suppl 2):S49-S73.
3. Alonso A, Krijthe BP, Aspelund T, et al. Simple risk model predicts incidence of atrial fibrillation in a racially and geographically diverse population: the CHARGE-AF consortium. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2 (2):e000102.
4. Goldstein BA, Navar AM, Pencina MJ, Ioannidis JP. Opportunities and challenges in developing risk prediction models with electronic health records data: a systematic review [published online May 17, 2016]. J Am Med Inform Assoc. doi:10.1093/jamia /ocw042
5. Hersh WR, Weiner MG, Embi PJ, et al. Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research. Med Care. 2013;51(8)(suppl 3):S30-S37.
6. Camm AJ, Lip GYH, De Caterina R, et al; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(21):2719-2747.
7. Healey JS, Sandhu RK. Are we ready for mass screening to detect atrial fibrillation? Circulation. 2015;131(25):2167-2168.
8. Kolek MJ, Graves AJ, Xu M, et al. Evaluation of a prediction model for the development of atrial fibrillation in a repository of electronic medical records [published online October 12, 2016]. JAMA Cardiol. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2016.3366
9. Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, Cook NR, et al. Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology. 2010;21(1):128-138.