Using greenhouse gas fluxes to define soil functional types

Plant and Soil

Volumn 423, Issue 1-2, 2018, Pages 285-294

  Petrakis, Sandra ^a   Barba, Josep ^a   Bond Lamberty, Ben ^b   Vargas, Rodrigo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Automated measurements; Ecosystem function; Greenhouse gases; Soil functionality

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FLUX MEASUREMENT; FOREST SOIL; GREENHOUSE GAS; METHANE; SOIL EMISSION; SPATIAL VARIATION;

EID: 85036587394     PISSN: 0032079X     EISSN: 15735036     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-017-3506-4     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alcaraz-Segura D, Paruelo J, Epstein H, Cabello J (2013) Environmental and human controls of ecosystem functional diversity in temperate South America. Remote Sens 5:127–154. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5010127
2. Allison SD (2012) A trait-based approach for modelling microbial litter decomposition. Ecol Lett 15:1058–1070. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01807.x
3. Amundson R, Berhe AA, Hopmans JW et al (2015) Soil and human security in the 21st century. Science 348:647–653. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261071
4. Barba J, Curiel Yuste J, Martínez-Vilalta J, Lloret F (2013) Drought-induced tree species replacement is reflected in the spatial variability of soil respiration in a mixed Mediterranean forest. For Ecol Manag 306:79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.025
5. Bond-Lamberty B, Thomson A (2010) A global database of soil respiration data. Biogeosciences 7:1915–1926. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1915-2010
6. Bond-Lamberty B, Epron D, Harden J et al (2016) Estimating heterotrophic respiration at large scales: challenges, approaches, and next steps. Ecosphere 7:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1380
7. Chapin FS, Bret-Harte MS, Hobbie SE, Zhong H (1996) Plant functional types as predictors of transient responses of arctic vegetation to global change. J Veg Sci 7:347–358. https://doi.org/10.2307/3236278
8. Cramer W, Bondeau A, Woodward FI et al (2001) Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models. Glob Chang Biol 7:357–373. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00383.x
9. Davidson EA, Belk E, Boone RD (1998) Soil water content and temperature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest. Glob Chang Biol 4:217–227. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00128.x
10. Díaz S, Briske D, McIntyre S (2002) Range management and plant functional types. In: Hodkingson K, Grice A (eds) Global rangelands: progress and prospects. CAB international, Wallingford, pp 81–100
11. Gutekunst MY, Vargas R, Seyfferth AL (2017) Impacts of soil incorporation of pre-incubated silica-rich rice residue on soil biogeochemistry and greenhouse gas fluxes under flooding and drying. Sci Total Environ 593:134–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.097
12. Hall S, McDowell W, Silver W (2013) When wet gets wetter: decoupling of moisture, redox biogeochemistry, and greenhouse gas fluxes in a humid tropical forest soil. Ecosystems 16:576–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-012-9631-2
13. Hashimoto S, Carvalhais N, Ito A et al (2015) Global spatiotemporal distribution of soil respiration modeled using a global database. Biogeosciences 12:4121–4132. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-4121-2015
14. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis: contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 2007
15. IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK et al (eds) Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324
16. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report summary for policymakers. In: Pachauri RK, Allen MR, Barros VR et al (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–39
17. Jenerette GD, Scott RL, Huxman TE (2008) Whole ecosystem metabolic pulses following precipitation events. Funct Ecol 22:924–930. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01450.x
18. Kim D-G, Vargas R, Bond-Lamberty B, Turetsky MR (2012) Effects of soil rewetting and thawing on soil gas fluxes: a review of current literature and suggestions for future research. Biogeosciences 9:2459–2483. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-2459-2012
19. Klironomos JN, Rillig MC, Allen MF (1999) Designing belowground field experiments with the help of semi-variance and power analyses. Appl Soil Ecol 12:227–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(99)00014-1
20. Lavorel S, Díaz S, Cornelissen JHC et al (2007) Plant functional types: are we getting any closer to the holy grail? In: Josep G. Canadell; Diane E. Pataki; Louis F. Pitelka (eds) terrestrial ecosystems in a changing world. Springer, Berlin, pp 149–164
21. Lee S-J, Berbery EH, Alcaraz-Segura D (2013) Effect of implementing ecosystem functional type data in a mesoscale climate model. Adv Atmos Sci 30:1373–1386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-012-2143-3
22. Leon E, Vargas R, Bullock S et al (2014) Hot spots, hot moments, and spatio-temporal controls on soil CO2 efflux in a water-limited ecosystem. Soil Biol Biochem 77:12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.05.029
23. Lovett GM, Turner MG, Jones CG, Weathers KC (2006) Ecosystem function in heterogeneous landscapes. In: Lovett GM, Jones CG, Turner MG, Weathers KC (eds) Ecosystem function in heterogeneous landscapes. Spinger, New York, pp 1–4
24. McBratney A, Field DJ, Koch A (2014) The dimensions of soil security. Geoderma 213:203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.08.013
25. Myhre G, Shindell D, Bréon F-M et al (2013) Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K et al (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 659–740
26. Ocko IB, Hamburg SP, Jacob DJ et al (2017) Unmask temporal trade-offs in climate policy debates. Science 356:492–493. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaj2350
27. Oertel C, Matschullat J, Zurba K et al (2016) Greenhouse gas emissions from soils-a review. Chemie der Erde - Geochemistry 76:327–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2016.04.002
28. Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P et al (2007) The vegan package
29. Parkin TB (1987) Soil microsites as a source of denitrification Variability1. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:1194. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1987.03615995005100050019x
30. Paruelo JM, Jobbágy EG, Sala OE (2001) Current distribution of ecosystem functional types in temperate South America. Ecosystems 4:683–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0037-9
31. Petrakis S, Seyfferth A, Kan J et al (2017) Influence of experimental extreme water pulses on greenhouse gas emissions from soils. Biogeochemistry 133:147–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0320-2
32. Pettorelli N, Schulte to Bühne H, Tulloch A et al (2017) Satellite remote sensing of ecosystem functions: opportunities, challenges and way forward. Remote Sens Ecol Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.59
33. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DepRoy S (2009) Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3:1–96
34. Rodeghiero M, Cescatti A (2008) Spatial variability and optimal sampling strategy of soil respiration. For Ecol Manag 255:106–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.08.025
35. Savage K, Phillips R, Davidson E (2014) High temporal frequency measurements of greenhouse gas emissions from soils. Biogeosciences 11:2709–2720. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-2709-2014
36. Shugart HH, Woodward FI (eds) (1997) Plant functional types: their relevance to ecosystem properties and global change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
37. Smith KA, Ball T, Conen F et al (2003) Exchange of greenhousegases between soil and atmosphere: interactions of soil physical factors and biological processes. Eur J Soil Sci 54:779–791. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.00567.x
38. van Hees PAW, Jones DL, Finlay R et al (2005) The carbon we do not see—the impact of low molecular weight compounds on carbon dynamics and respiration in forest soils: a review. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.06.010
39. Wright JP, Naeem S, Hector A et al (2006) Conventional functional classification schemes underestimate the relationship with ecosystem functioning. Ecol Lett 9:111–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00850.x