The glacial pace of scientific publishing: Why it hurts everyone and what we can do to fix it

FASEB Journal

Volumn 26, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 3589-3593

  Vosshall, Leslie B ^a  

^a ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTHOR; EDITOR; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; QUALITY CONTROL; SCIENTIST;

AUTHORSHIP; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PUBLISHING;

EID: 84865741800     PISSN: 08926638     EISSN: 15306860     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1096/fj.12-0901ufm     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Rubin, G. M. (1973) The nucleotide sequence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae 5.8 S ribosomal ribonucleic acid. J. Biol. Chem. 248, 3860-3875
2. (1991) doi:10.1038/351371a0, doi:10.1038/351397a0, doi:10.1038/351400a0, doi:10.1038/351402a0, doi:10.1038/351406a0. Nature 351, 333-424
3. (2011) doi:10.1038/nature10109, doi:10.1038/nature10081, doi:10.1038/nature10083, doi:10.1038/nature09982, doi:10.1038/nature09986. Nature 474, 5-120
4. Goldbeck-Wood, S. (1999) Evidence on peer review - scientific quality control or smokescreen? BMJ 318, 44-45
5. Rennie, D. (2002) Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. JAMA 287, 2759-2760
6. Ploegh, H. (2011) End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments. Nature 472, 391
7. Tufte, E. R. (2001) The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT, USA