Augmented moment method for stochastic ensembles with delayed couplings. II. FitzHugh-Nagumo model

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 9-

  Hasegawa, Hideo ^a  

^a TOKYO GAKUGEI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; FUNCTIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; NONLINEAR EQUATIONS; WHITE NOISE;

AUGMENTED MOMENT METHOD (AMM); CORRELATION FUNCTIONS; GLOBAL VARIABLES; STOCHASTIC DELAY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS (SDDE);

SYSTEMS SCIENCE;

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOPHYSICS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; OSCILLOMETRY; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; THEORETICAL MODEL; TIME;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; BIOPHYSICS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NERVE NET; NEURONS; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; OSCILLOMETRY; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 85036249393     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.021912     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. U. Küchler and B. Mensch, Stoch. Stoch. Rep.SSTREY1045-1129 40, 23 (1992).
2. M. C. Mackey and I. G. Nechaeva, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE81063-651X10.1103/PhysRevE.52.3366 52, 3366 (1995).
3. S. Guillouzic, I. L’Heureux, and A. Longtin, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE81063-651X10.1103/PhysRevE.59.3970 59, 3970 (1999).
4. T. Ohira and T. Yamane, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE81063-651X10.1103/PhysRevE.61.1247 61, 1247 (2000).
5. T. D. Frank and P. J. Beek, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE81063-651X10.1103/PhysRevE.64.021917 64, 021917 (2001).
6. T. D. Frank, P. J. Beek, and R. Friedrich, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE81063-651X10.1103/PhysRevE.68.021912 68, 021912 (2003).
7. D. Huber, and L. S. Tsimring, Phys. Rev. Lett.PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.91.260601 91, 260601 (2003).
8. C. M. Marcus and R. M. Westervelt, Phys. Rev. APLRAAN1050-294710.1103/PhysRevA.39.347 39, 347 (1989).
9. C. van Vreeswijk, L. F. Abbott, and G. B. Ermentrout, J. Comput. Neurosci.JCNEFR0923-5313 1, 303 (1994).
10. J. Foss, A. Longtin, B. Mensour, and J. Milton, Phys. Rev. Lett.PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.76.708 76, 708 (1996).
11. K. Pakdaman, J. Vibert, E. Bousssard, and N. Azmy, Neural NetworksNNETEB0893-608010.1016/0893-6080(95)00097-6 9, 797 (1996).
12. U. Ernst, K. Pawelzik, and T. Geisel, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE81063-651X10.1103/PhysRevE.57.2150 57, 2150 (1998).
13. R. E. Plant, SIAM (Soc. Ind. Appl. Math.) J. Appl. Math.SMJMAP0036-1399 40, 150 (1981).10.1137/0140012
14. S. R. Campbell and D. Wang, Physica DPDNPDT0167-278910.1016/S0167-2789(97)80010-3 111, 151 (1998).
15. S. A. Campbell and M. Waite, Nonlin. Anal. 47, 1093 (2001).10.1016/S0362-546X(01)00249-8
16. M. G. Rosenblum and A. S. Pikovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett.PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.92.114102 92, 114102 (2004).
17. M. Park and S. Kim, J. Korean Phys. Soc.KPSJAS0374-4884 29, 9 (1996).
18. H. Hasegawa, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.JUPSAU0031-9015 69, 3726 (2000).10.1143/JPSJ.69.3726
19. S. Kim, S. H. Park, and C. S. Ryu, Phys. Rev. Lett.PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2911 79, 2911 (1997).
20. R. Borisyuk, BioSystemsBSYMBO0303-264710.1016/S0303-2647(02)00058-8 67, 3 (2002).
21. M. P. Zorzano and L. Vázquez, Physica DPDNPDT0167-278910.1016/S0167-2789(03)00007-1 179, 105 (2003).
22. H. Hasegawa, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE81063-651X 70, 021911 (2004).10.1103/PhysRevE.70.021911
23. H. Hasegawa, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE81063-651X10.1103/PhysRevE.67.041903 67, 041903 (2003).
24. H. Hasegawa, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE81063-651X10.1103/PhysRevE.68.041909 68, 041909 (2003).
25. R. Rodriguez and H. C. Tuckwell, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE81063-651X10.1103/PhysRevE.54.5585 54, 5585 (1996).
26. The normalization factor of the coupling term is (Formula presented) in this paper while it is (Formula presented) in Ref.; results of the latter are obtainable from those of the former by a replacement of (Formula presented).
27. M. Salami, C. Itami, T. Tsumoto, and F. Kimura, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.PNASA60027-842410.1073/pnas.0937380100 100, 6174 (2003).
28. The bracket of (Formula presented) denotes the average (or the expectation value) of an arbitrary function (Formula presented) of (Formula presented) FN neuron ensembles, defined by (Formula presented), where (Formula presented) denotes a probability distribution function (pdf) for (Formula presented)-dimensional random variables of (Formula presented).
29. H. C. Tuckwell and R. Rodriguez, J. Comput. Neurosci.JCNEFR0923-531310.1023/A:1008811814446 5, 91 (1998).
30. S. Tanabe and K. Pakdaman, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE81063-651X 63, 031?911 (2001).
31. S. Tanabe, S. Sato, and K. Pakdaman, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE81063-651X10.1103/PhysRevE.60.7235 60, 7235 (1999).
32. S. Tanabe and K. Pakdaman, Biol. Cybern.BICYAF0340-120010.1007/s004220100256 85, 269 (2001).
33. J. H. E. Cartwright, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE81063-651X10.1103/PhysRevE.62.1149 62, 1149 (2000).
34. C. D. E. Boschi, E. Louis, and G. Ortega, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE81063-651X10.1103/PhysRevE.65.012901 65, 012901 (2001).
35. B. Hu and C. Zhou, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE81063-651X10.1103/PhysRevE.61.R1001 61, R1001 (2000).
36. G. De Vries and A. Sherman, Bull. Math. Biol.BMTBAP0092-824010.1006/bulm.2001.0228 63, 371 (2001).
37. Although we tried to perform AMM calculations by using the same FN model as Zorzano and Vázquez (ZV) adopted (Ref.), we could not do it because the form of the network coupling of ZV was rather different from ours.
38. M. Dhamala, V. K. Jirsa, and M. Ding, Phys. Rev. Lett.PRLTAO0031-9007 92, 074?104 (2004).
39. H. Hasegawa, e-print cond-mat/0403415.