CU-GWU perspective at SemEval-2016 task 6: Ideological stance detection in informal text

SemEval 2016 - 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 434-439

  Elfardy, Heba ^a   Diab, Mona ^b  

^a Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences   (United States)

^b The George Washington University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SEMANTIC DICTIONARIES; SEMANTIC FEATURES; SUBTASK; SUPERVISED SYSTEMS; TEST SETS;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 85035777777     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.18653/v1/s16-1070     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Collin F Baker, Charles J Fillmore, and John B Lowe. 1998. The berkeley framenet project. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Computational linguistics-Volume 1. Association for Computational Linguistics.
2. Desai Chen, Nathan Schneider, Dipanjan Das, and Noah A Smith. 2010. Semafor: Frame argument resolution with log-linear models. In Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on semantic evaluation. Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. Dipanjan Das, Nathan Schneider, Desai Chen, and Noah A Smith. 2010. Semafor 1.0: A probabilistic frame-semantic parser. Language Technologies Institute, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.
4. ∗ SEM2015).
5. Robert MEntman. 1993. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. volume 43. Wiley Online Library.
6. Christiane Fellbaum. 2010. Wordnet: An electronic lexical database. 1998. WordNet is available from http://www.cogsci. princeton. edu/wn.
7. Charles J Fillmore. 2006. Frame semantics. Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings, 34.
8. Weiwei Guo and Mona Diab. 2012. Modeling sentences in the latent space. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Long Papers-Volume 1, pages 864-872. Association for Computational Linguistics.
9. Mark Hall, Eibe Frank, Geoffrey Holmes, Bernhard Pfahringer, Peter Reutemann, and Ian H Witten. 2009. The weka data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 11(1):10-18.
10. Kazi Saidul Hasan and Vincent NG. 2012. Predicting stance in ideological debate with rich linguistic knowledge. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Computational Linguistics.
11. Kazi Saidul Hasan and Vincent Ng. 2013. Extralinguistic constraints on stance recognition in ideological debates. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics.
12. Beata Beigman Klebanov, Eyal Beigman, and Daniel Diermeier. 2010. Vocabulary choice as an indicator of perspective. In ACL, pages 253-257. Association for Computational Linguistics.
13. Wei-Hao Lin, Theresa Wilson, Janyce Wiebe, and Alexander Hauptmann. 2006. Which side are you on?: identifying perspectives at the document and sentence levels. In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 109-116. Association for Computational Linguistics.
14. Saif M. Mohammad, Svetlana Kiritchenko, Parinaz Sobhani, Xiaodan Zhu, and Colin Cherry. 2016. SemEval-2016 Task 6: Detecting stance in tweets. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, SemEval'16, June.
15. Richard Socher, Alex Perelygin, Jean Y Wu, Jason Chuang, Christopher D Manning, Andrew Y Ng, and Christopher Potts. 2013. Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank. In Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP), volume 1631. Citeseer.
16. Swapna Somasundaran and Janyce Wiebe. 2010. Recognizing stances in ideological online debates. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text, pages 116-124. Association for Computational Linguistics.
17. Yla R Tausczik and James W Pennebaker. 2010. The psychological meaning of words: Liwc and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of language and social psychology, 29 (1).