Women in science, medicine, and global health: call for papers

The Lancet

Volumn 390, Issue 10111, 2017, Pages 2423-2424

  Clark, Jocalyn ^a   Zuccala, Elizabeth ^a   Horton, Richard ^a  

^a THE LANCET   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAREER; EXPECTATION; GENDER BIAS; GEOGRAPHY; GLOBAL HEALTH; HEALTH EQUITY; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; MASCULINITY; NOTE; ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY; PARITY; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEXISM; SEXUAL ASSAULT; SEXUAL HARASSMENT; SEXUALITY; SOCIOLOGY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOMEN'S RIGHTS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE MANPOWER; MANPOWER; SCIENCE;

FEMALE; GLOBAL HEALTH; HEALTH MANPOWER; HUMANS; SCIENCE; SEXISM; WOMEN;

EID: 85035356419     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: 1474547X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32903-3     Document Type: Note

References (20)

1. UNFPA. Worlds apart: reproductive health and rights in an age of inequality. http://www.unfpa.org/swop, 2017 (accessed Nov 15, 2017).
2. UNESCO. UNESCO science report: towards 2030. https://en.unesco.org/unesco_science_report, 2015 (accessed Nov 15, 2017).
3. Vernos, I, Quotas are questionable. Nature, 495, 2013, 39.
4. European Research Council. Gender statistics. http://erc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document/fileGender_statistics_Dec_2016.pdf, 2016 (accessed Nov 15, 2017).
5. Xie, Y, Zhang, C, Lai, Q, China's rise as a major contributor to science and technology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111 (2014), 9437–9442.
6. Dhatt, R, Kickbusch, I, Thompson, K, Act now: a call to action for gender equality in global health. Lancet, 389, 2017, 602.
7. Hawkes, S, Buse, K, Kapilashrami, A, Gender blind? An analysis of global public-private partnerships for health. Glob Health, 13, 2017, 26.
8. Schwalbe, N, Global health: generation men. Lancet, 390, 2017, 733.
9. Edmunds, LD, Ovseiko, PV, Shepperd, S, et al. Why do women choose or reject careers in academic medicine? A narrative review of empirical evidence. Lancet 388 (2016), 2948–2958.
10. Nature. Science for all. Nature, 495, 2013, 5.
11. Raymond, J, Most of us are biased. Nature 495 (2013), 33–34.
12. Parks, A, Redberg, R, Women in medicine and patient outcomes: equal rights for equal work?. JAMA Intern Med, 177, 2017, 161.
13. Double jeopardy: Gender bias against women of color in science. http://worklifelaw.org/publication/double-jeopardy-gender-bias-against-women-of-color-in-science/, 2015 (accessed Nov 15, 2017).
14. Hafkin, NJ, National Assessments on Gender and Science, Technology and Innovation. https://owsd.net/sites/default/files/NH4EastAfricaGEKS.pdf, 2016 (accessed Nov 15, 2017).
15. Institute for Gender and the Economy. Gender and the economy research briefs. https://www.gendereconomy.org/research-briefs/, 2017 (accessed Nov 15, 2017).
16. Rimmer, A, Five facts about the gender pay gap in UK medicine. BMJ, 354, 2016, i3878.
17. Jagsi, R, Griffith, KA, Jones, R, Perumalswami, CR, Ubel, P, Stewart, A, Sexual harassment and discrimination: experiences of academic medical faculty. JAMA 315 (2016), 2120–2121.
18. Hankivsky, O, Reid, C, Cormier, R, et al. Exploring the promises of intersectionality for advancing women's health research. Int J Equity Health, 9, 2010, 5.
19. Nature. Gender imbalance in science journals is still pervasive. Nature 541 (2017), 435–436.
20. Elsevier Research Intelligence. Gender in a global research landscape. https://www.elsevier.com/research-intelligence/campaigns/gender-17, 2017 (accessed Nov 15, 2017).