Experience of exclusion: A framework analysis of socioeconomic factors affecting cardiac rehabilitation participation among patients with acute coronary syndrome

European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

Volumn 16, Issue 8, 2017, Pages 715-723

  Pedersen, Maria ^a   Overgaard, Dorthe ^b   Andersen, Ingelise ^a   Baastrup, Marie ^c   Egerod, Ingrid ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

acute coronary syndrome; Cardiac rehabilitation; framework analysis; qualitative methods; social inequality; socioeconomic position

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COUNSELING; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTHY LIFESTYLE; HEART REHABILITATION; HUMAN; ILLNESS TRAJECTORY; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SOCIAL ALIENATION; SOCIOECONOMICS; STUDY DESIGN; YOUNG ADULT; CASE REPORT; DENMARK; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; VERY ELDERLY;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARDIAC REHABILITATION; DENMARK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 85035141230     PISSN: 14745151     EISSN: 18731953     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1474515117711590     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anderson L, Thompson DR, Oldridge N. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 1: CD001800.
2. Danish Heart Foundation. Key numbers, https://www.hjerteforeningen.dk/alt-om-dit-hjerte/fakta-om-hjertekarsygdomme/ (2016, accessed 15 July 2016).
3. Clark AM, King-Shier KM, Thompson DR. A qualitative systematic review of influences on attendance at cardiac rehabilitation programs after referral. Am Heart J 2012; 164: 835–845, e2.
4. Christensen AV, Koch MB, Davidsen M. Educational inequality in cardiovascular disease depends on diagnosis: A nationwide register based study from Denmark. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016; 23: 826–833.
5. Marmot MG, Shipley MJ, Hemingway H. Biological and behavioural explanations of social inequalities in coronary heart disease: the Whitehall II study. Diabetologia 2008; 51: 1980–1988.
6. Veronesi G, Ferrario MM, Kuulasmaa K. Educational class inequalities in the incidence of coronary heart disease in Europe. Heart 2016; 102: 958–965.
7. Matata BM, Shaw M, Grayson AD. The impact of social deprivation on coronary revascularisation treatment outcomes within the National Health Service in England and Wales. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016; 23: 316–327.
8. Graham H. Unequal lives - Health and socioeconomic inequalities. Berkshire, England: Open University Press, 2007.
9. The Danish Health Authority. Psychologist agreement, https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=142603 (2016, accessed 15 July 2016).
10. Nielsen KM, Faergeman O, Foldspang A. Cardiac rehabilitation: health characteristics and socio-economic status among those who do not attend. Eur J Public Health 2008; 18: 479–483.
11. Gadamer H. Elements of a theory of hermeneutic experience. In: Gadamer H, (ed) Truth and method. 2nd ed. Great Britain: Continuum Publishing Group, 2004.
12. Morgan DL, Ataie J, Carder P. Introducing dyadic interviews as a method for collecting qualitative data. Qual Health Res 2013; 23: 1276–1284.
13. Eisikovits Z, Koren C. Approaches to and outcomes of dyadic interview analysis. Qual Health Res 2010; 20: 1642–1655.
14. Ward DJ, Furber C, Tierney S. Using Framework Analysis in nursing research: a worked example. J Adv Nurs 2013; 69: 2423–2431.
15. Spencer L, Ritchie J, O’Connor W. Analysis in practice. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, McNaughton CN. (eds) Qualitative research practice. A guide for social science students & researchers. 2nd ed. London, UK: National Centre for Social Research, 2014, pp. 296–322.
16. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data and analysis for applied policy research. In: Huberman AM, Miles MB, (eds) The qualitative researcher’s companion. California, USA: SAGE, 2002, pp. 310–329.
17. RICKHAM PP. Human Experimentation. Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. Br Med J 1964; 2: 177.
18. Leung YW, Brual J, MacPherson A. Geographic issues in cardiac rehabilitation utilization: a narrative review. Health Place 2010; 16: 1196–1205.
19. Abel T. Cultural capital and social inequality in health. J Epidemiol Community Health 2008; 62: e13.
20. Rostila M. The dark side of social capital: Homophily and closure of immigrants’social networks in the Swedish welfare state. In: Rostila M, (ed) Social capital and healh inequality in European welfare states. 1st ed. New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, pp. 161–168.
21. Schneekloth Christiansen N, Zinckernagel L, Zwisler AD. Livet med en hjertesygdom. En undersøgelse om det at leve med en hjertesygdom og af hjertepatienters vurdering af sundhedsvæsnets indsats. [A study about living with heart disease and cardiac patients assessment of the health care sector]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Hjerteforeningen og Statens Institut for Folkesundhed [Danish Heart Foundation and The National Institute of Public Health], 2015.
22. Kleinman A.The meaning of symtoms and disorders. In: Kleinman A, (ed) The illness narratives. Suffering, healing & the human condition. Lavergne, USA: Basic Books, 1988, pp. 3–10.
23. Molloy GJ, Hamer M, Randall G. Marital status and cardiac rehabilitation attendance: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2008; 15: 557–561.