The mouse tumor biology database: A comprehensive resource for mouse models of human cancer

Cancer Research

Volumn 77, Issue 21, 2017, Pages e67-e70

  Krupke, Debra M ^a   Begley, Dale A ^a   Sundberg, John P ^a   Richardson, Joel E ^a   Neuhauser, Steven B ^a   Bult, Carol J ^a  

^a JACKSON LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTICLE; CANCER GENETICS; CANCER GROWTH; CANCER MODEL; CANCER RESEARCH; CANCER RESISTANCE; COMPUTER LANGUAGE; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DATA PROCESSING; EXPERIMENTAL MOUSE; GENETIC BACKGROUND; GENETIC MODEL; GENETIC TRAIT; HUMAN; MEDICAL EXPERT; MOUSE; MOUSE STRAIN; NOMENCLATURE; NONHUMAN; ONLINE SYSTEM; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOFTWARE; STANDARDIZATION; TREATMENT RESPONSE; TUMOR XENOGRAFT; ANIMAL; DISEASE MODEL; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; INTERNET; NEOPLASM; PATHOLOGY;

ANIMALS; DATABASES, GENETIC; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; HUMANS; INTERNET; MICE; NEOPLASMS;

EID: 85034961195     PISSN: 00085472     EISSN: 15387445     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0584     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Näf D, Krupke DM, Sundberg JP, Eppig JT, Bult CJ. The mouse tumor biology database: a public resource for cancer genetics and pathology of the mouse. Cancer Res 2002;62:1235-40
2. Justice MJ, Siracusa LD, Stewart AF. Technical approaches for mouse models of human disease. Dis Models Mech 2011;4:305-10
3. Liu ET, Bolcun-Filas E, Grass DS, Lutz C, Murray S, Shultz L, et al. Of mice and CRISPR: the post-CRISPR future of the mouse as a model system for the human condition. EMBO Rep 2017;18:187-93
4. Kopetz S, Lemos R, PowisG. The promise of patient-derived xenografts: the best laid plans of mice and men. Clin Cancer Res 2012;18:5160-2
5. McGonigle P, Ruggeri B. Animal models of human disease: challenges in enabling translation. Biochem Pharmacol 2014;87:162-71
6. Khaled WT, Liu P. Cancer mouse models: past, present and future. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2014;27:54-60.
7. Malaney P, Nicosia SV, Dave V. One mouse, one patient paradigm: new avatars of personalized cancer therapy. Cancer Lett 2014;344:1-12
8. Drinkwater NR, Gould MN. The long path from QTL to gene. PLoS Genet 2012;8:e1002975
9. Politi K, PaoW. How genetically engineered mouse tumor models provide insights into human cancers. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:2273-81
10. Sundberg JP, Roopenian DC, Liu ET, Schofield PN. The Cinderella effect: searching for the best fit between mouse models and human diseases. J Invest Dermatol 2013;133:2509-13
11. Sundberg JP, Schofield PN. A mouse by any other name. J Invest Dermatol 2009;129:1599-1601
12. Blake JA, Bult CJ, Eppig JT, Kadin JA, Richardson JE, Mouse Genome Database Group. The mouse genome database: integration of and access to knowledge about the laboratory mouse. Nuclei Acids Res 2014;42: D810-7
13. OnkenMD, Winkler AE, Kanchi KL, Chalivendra V, Law JH, Rickert CG, et al. A surprising cross-species conservation in the genomic landscape of mouse and human oral cancer identifies a transcriptional signature predicting metastatic disease. Clin Cancer Res 2014;20: 2873-84
14. Bradley A, Anastassiadis K, Ayadi A, Battery JF, Bell C, Birling MC, et al. The mammalian gene function resource: the international knockout mouse consortium. Mamm Genome 2012;23:580-6
15. Svenson KL, Gatti DM, Valdar W, Welsh CE, Cheng R, Chesler EJ, et al. High-resolution genetic mapping using the mouse diversity outbred population. Genetics 2012;190:437-47