Status and future dynamics of decentralised renewable energy niche building processes in Argentina

Energy Research and Social Science

Volumn 35, Issue , 2018, Pages 57-67

  Schaube, Philipp ^a,b   Ortiz, Willington ^b,c   Recalde, Marina ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WUPPERTAL   (Germany)

^b Institute for Ecological Economy Research   (Germany)

^c LEUPHANA UNIVERSITY OF LÜNEBURG   (Germany)

^d Fundacion Bariloche   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Argentina; Decentralised renewable energy niche; Energy transition; Strategic Niche Management

Indexed keywords

EID: 85034434083     PISSN: 22146296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.037     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 5(3) (May/June 2016), pp. 305–326. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wene.190.
2. Esteves, B., Democratización Energética-100% Renovable: La energía del Futuro. 2011.
3. CAMMESA, Informe mensual - Diciembre 2016, Buenos Aires, 2017. http://www.cammesa.com/archcount.nsf/LinkCounter?OpenAgent&X=InformeMensual*DICIEMBRE*2016&L=/linfomen.nsf/WInforme+Mensual/305341B9803DF393032580AD0049A970/$File/Informe Mensual_2016-12.pdf.
4. Delina, L., Janetos, A., Cosmopolitan, dynamic, and contested energy futures: navigating the pluralities and polarities in the energy systems of tomorrow. Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 35, 2018.
5. International Energy Agency, World Energy Outlook. 2014 http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/ (Accessed 7 April 2015).
6. Zazzini, M., Wirszke, M.P., El presente de la eólica en Argentina. Energ. XXI 133 (2013), 68–69.
7. Fenés, G., Un repaso por los problemas que tiene Argentina para atraer inversiones en energías renovables - Energía Estratégica - Información en Movimiento. 2015 http://www.energiaestrategica.com/las-inversiones-en-energias-renovables-que-no-fueron/ (Accessed 31 March 2015).
8. Secretaría de Energía, Energías Renovables Diagnóstico, barreras y propuestas. 2009.
9. di Sbroiavacca, N., Falzon, J., CLIMACAP- Climate and Energy Policy Reviews for Colombia, Brazil, Argentina, and Mexico. 2014, CLIMACAP.
10. Budzinski, S., Barlatey, M.A., Argentina - biogas, yet another challenge. Biogas J., 2014, 30–33.
11. CADER, + Renovables 2012/2013 vol. 4, 2013.
12. World Bank, Renewable Energy for Rural Areas. 2015 http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2015/03/19/000477144_20150319092309/Rendered/PDF/PAD8340PAD0P13010Box385454B00OUO090.pdf (Accessed 30 March 2015).
13. Best, S., Remote Access: Expanding Energy Provision in Rural Argentina Through Public-private Partnerships and Renewable Energy. A Case Study of The PERMER Programme. 2011.
14. Alazraki, R., Haselip, J., Assessing the uptake of small-scale photovoltaic electricity production in Argentina: the PERMER project. J. Clean. Prod. 15 (2007), 131–142, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.12.015.
15. Durand, Argentina PERMER: The Argentine Off-Grid Electrification Concessionaire. 2012, EJSEDSA, 0–4.
16. Ángel, C., Luciano, C., Juan Pablo, D., Guillermo, M., Energía Eólica, Energía Eólica Área Energías Renovables INTI NEUQUÉN 2° Informe de avance, Entrevistas fabricantes nacionales de aerogeneradores. 2011 https://www.inti.gob.ar/neuquen/pdf/informe2.pdf?seccion=aerogeneradores.
17. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Industrial, Energía Eólica Aerogeneradores de Baja Potencia - Programa de Fortalecimiento. 2017 https://www.inti.gob.ar/neuquen/index.php?seccion=aerogeneradores.
18. Socolovsky, H.P., Raggio, D., Godfrin, E.M., Jakimczyk, J., Diaz, F.J., Castro, N.E., Pedro, G., Righini, R., Proyecto iresud: interconexión de sistemas fotovoltaicos a la red eléctrica en ambientes urbanos estado de avance a juliode 2014 y primeras mediciones en sistemas piloto, vol. 2, 2014, 127–137.
19. del P. Andres, M., Caracterización de un Generador Eólico de Baja Potencia. 2014 http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/bitstream/handle/10915/55527/Documento_completo.pdf-PDFA.pdf?sequence=1.
20. Garrido, S., Lalouf, A., Moreira, A.J., Tecnologias para la inclusión social y dinámicas desarrollo sustentable. Análisis socio-tecnico de experiencias de desarrollo local basadas en el aprovechamiento de energías renovables. Astrolabio. Nueva Epoca. 12 (2014), 73–105.
21. Francisco Victoriano, C., Eficiencia energética y energías renovables apropiadas para la agricultura familiar y el desarrollo rural. 2012 http://inta.gob.ar/proyectos/AEAI-275332.
22. Hermwille, L., The role of narratives in socio-technical transitions—Fukushima and the energy regimes of Japan, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 11 (2016), 237–246, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.001.
23. Johan, S., Geels, F.W., Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 20 (2008), 537–554.
24. Geels, F.W., The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions 1 (2011), 24–40, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002.
25. Schneidewind, U., Augenstein, K., Analyzing a transition to a sustainability-oriented science system in Germany. Innov. Soc. Transitions 3 (2012), 16–28.
26. Geels, F.W., Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res. Policy 31 (2002), 1257–1274, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.
27. Elzen, B., Geels, F.W., Hofman, P.S., Sociotechnical Scenarios (STSc): Development and Evaluation of a New Methodology to Explore Transitions Towards a Sustainable Energy Supply. 2002 http://doc.utwente.nl/45064/.
28. Geels, F.W., Deuten, J., Local and global dynamics in technological development: a socio-cognitive perspective on knowledge flows and lessons from reinforced concrete. Sci. Public Policy 33:4 (2006), 30–33, 10.3152/147154306781778984.
29. Seyfang, G., Hielscher, S., Hargreaves, T., Martiskainen, M., Smith, A., A grassroots sustainable energy niche? Reflections on community energy in the UK. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions 13 (2014), 21–44.
30. Smith, A., Hargreaves, T., Hielscher, S., Martiskainen, M., Seyfang, G., Making the most of community energies: three perspectives on grassroots innovation. Environ. Plann. A 48 (2016), 407–432, 10.1177/0308518X15597908.
31. Geels, F., Raven, R., Non-linearity and expectations in niche-development trajectories: ups and downs in Dutch biogas development (1973–2003). Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 18 (2006), 375–392, 10.1080/09537320600777143.
32. Urban, F., Nordensvärd, J., Low Carbon Development: Key Issues. 2013, Routledge.
33. Grin, J., Rotmans, J., Schot, J., Geels, F., Loorbach, D., Routledge studies in sustainability transitions. 2010, Routledge, New York/London.
34. Hoogma, R., Experimenting for Sustainable Transport: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management. 2002, Taylor & Francis.
35. Smith, A., Translating sustainabilities between green niches and socio-technical regimes. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 19 (2007), 427–450.
36. Grin, J., Van De Graaf, H., Implementation as communicative action: an interpretive understanding of interactions between policy actors and target groups. Policy Sci. 29 (1996), 291–319.
37. Geels, F.W., Hekkert, M.P., Jacobsson, S., The dynamics of sustainable innovation journeys. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 20 (2008), 521–536, 10.1080/09537320802292982.
38. Schot, J., Hoogma, R., How innovative are users? A critique of learning-by-doing and-using. Technol. Mark. Demand, Users Innov., 2001 p. 307.
39. Raven, R., Strategic Niche Management for Biomass Strategic Niche Management for Biomass. 2005 http://w3.tm.tue.nl/fileadmin/tm/TDO/Rob_Raven.pdf.
40. Mourik, R., Raven, R., A Practioner's View on Strategic Niche Management Towards a Future Research Outline. 2006, 37.
41. Augenstein, K., E-Mobility as a Sustainable System Innovation Insights from a Captured Niche. 2014.
42. Kemp, R., Schot, J., Hoogma, R., Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 10 (1998), 175–198, 10.1080/09537329808524310.
43. Laerd, Purposive Sampling. 2015 http://dissertation.laerd.com/purposive-sampling.php (Accessed 8 June 2015).
44. Gibson, W., Brown, A., Working with Qualitative Data. 2009, Sage.
45. Haselip, J., Potter, C., Post-neoliberal electricity market re-reforms in Argentina: diverging from market prescriptions?. Energy Policy 38 (2010), 1168–1176, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.007.
46. Di Bella, C.G., Norton, L.D., Ntamatungiro, J., Ogawa, S., Samaké I., Santoro, M., Energy Subsidies in Latin America and the Caribbean: Stocktaking and Policy Challenges. 2015.
47. Recalde, M., Bouille, D., Girardin, L.O., Limitaciones para el desarrollo de energías renovables en Argentina: el rol de las condiciones de marco desde una perspectiva histórica. Probl. Desarro. 46 (2015), 89–115.
48. Haselip, J., Nygaard, I., Hansen, U., Ackom, E., Diffusion of Renewable Energy Technologies Case Studies of Enabling Frameworks in Developing Countries. 2011 http://tech-action.org.
49. Mori, A., Sociotechnical and political economy perspectives in the Chinese energy transition. Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 35, 2018.
50. Sareen, S., Energy distribution trajectories in two Western Indian states: comparative politics and sectoral dynamics. Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 35, 2018.
51. Delina, L., Whose and what futures? Navigating the contested coproduction of Thailand's energy sociotechnical imaginaries. Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 5, 2018.
52. Stephens, J.C., Peterson, T.R., Wilson, E.J., Socio-political evaluation of energy deployment (SPEED): a framework applied to smart grid. Ucla Law Rev. 61 (2014), 1930–1961.
53. Stephens, J.C., Wilson, E.J., Peterson, T.R., Socio-Political Evaluation of Energy Deployment (SPEED): An integrated research framework analyzing energy technology deployment. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 75 (2008), 1224–1246, 10.1016/j.techfore.2007.12.003.
54. Boucher, M., Decentralized energy: prospects, justice, and transition. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 11 (2016), 288–293, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.006.