Overcoming salience bias: How real-time feedback fosters resource conservation

Management Science

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 1458-1476

  Tiefenbeck, Verena ^a,b   Goette, Lorenz ^b,c   Degen, Kathrin ^c   Tasic, Vojkan ^a   Fleisch, Elgar ^a,d   Lalive, Rafael ^c   Staake, Thorsten ^e  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ST GALLEN   (Switzerland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BAMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Decision making; Digitalization; Energy conservation; Environmental behavior; Green information systems; Randomized controlled trials; Real time feedback; Salience of information; Water conservation

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; DECISION MAKING; ENERGY CONSERVATION; FEEDBACK; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; WATER CONSERVATION;

DIGITALIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR; GREEN INFORMATION SYSTEMS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REAL-TIME FEEDBACK; SALIENCE OF INFORMATION;

NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT;

EID: 85034404513     PISSN: 00251909     EISSN: 15265501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2646     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Abrahamse W, Steg L, Vlek C, Rothengatter T (2005) A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. J. Environ. Psych. 25(3):273-291.
2. Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
3. Allcott H (2011) Social norms and energy conservation. J. Public Econom. 95(9-10):1082-1095.
4. Allcott H, Mullainathan S (2010) Behavior and energy policy. Science 327(5970):1204-1205.
5. Allcott H, Rogers T (2014) The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from energy conservation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(10):3003-3037.
6. Allcott H, Wozny N (2013) Gasoline prices, fuel economy, and the energy paradox. Rev. Econom. Statist. 96(5):779-795.
7. Asensio OI, Delmas MA (2015) Nonprice incentives and energy conservation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112(6):E510-E515.
8. Attari SZ (2014) Perceptions of water use. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(14):5129-5134.
9. Attari SZ, DeKay ML, Davidson CI, de Bruin WB (2010) Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107(37):16054-16059.
10. Azevedo IML, Morgan MG, Lave L (2011) Residential and regional electricity consumption in the U.S. And EU: How much will higher prices reduce CO2 emissions? Electricity J. 24(1):21-29.
11. Ball J (2009) Under pressure: Bathers duck weak shower heads. Wall Street Journal (July 21), http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB125807 041772846273.
12. Bearden WO, Etzel MJ (1982) Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. J. Consumer Res. 9(2):183-194.
13. Bernedo M, Ferraro PJ, Price M (2014) The persistent impacts of norm-based messaging and their implications for water conservation. J. Consumer Policy 37(3):437-452.
14. Bolderdjk JW, Steg L, Geller ES, Lehman PK, Postmes T (2013) Comparing the effectiveness of monetary versus moral motives in environmental campaigning. Nature Climate Change 3(4): 413-416.
15. Bollinger B, Leslie P, Sorensen A (2011) Calorie posting in chain restaurants. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy 3(1):91-128.
16. Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2012) Salience theory of choice under risk. Quart. J. Econom. 127(3):1243-1285.
17. Brent DA, Cook JH, Olsen S (2015) Social comparisons, household water use, and participation in utility conservation programs: Evidence from three randomized trials. J. Assoc. Environ. Resource Economists 2(4):597-627.
18. Buchanan K, Russo R, Anderson B (2015) The question of energy reduction: The problem(s) with feedback. Energy Policy 77(February):89-96.
19. Costa DL, Kahn ME (2013) Energy conservation "nudges" and environmentalist ideology: Evidence from a randomized residential electricity field experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):680-702.
20. Dai H, Milkman KL, Riis J (2014) The fresh start effect: Temporal landmarks motivate aspirational behavior. Management Sci. 60(10):2563-2582.
21. Degen K, Efferson C, Frei F, Goette L, Lalive R (2013) Smart Metering, Beratung oder sozialer Vergleich: Was beeinflusst den Elektrizitätsverbrauch? Final report to the Swiss Federal Office of Energy, Ittigen, Switzerland. Http://www.bfe.admin.ch/php/modules/enet/streamfile.php?file-000000011088.pdf&name-000000290850
22. DellaVigna S, List JA, Malmendier U (2012) Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1): 1-56.
23. Delmas MA, Lessem N (2014) Saving power to conserve your reputation? The effectiveness of private versus public information. J. Environ. Econom. Management 67(3):353-370.
24. Diekmann A, Meyer R, Mühlemann C, Diem A (2009) Schweizer Umweltsurvey 2007-Analysen und Ergebnisse (Swiss environmental survey-Analyses and results). Report to the Swiss Federal Statistical Office (BFS) and to the Federal Office for the Environment (BAFU). Technical report, ETH Zurich, Zurich. Http://www.socio.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special -interest/gess/chair-of-sociology-dam/documents/research/umweltsurvey/2007/reports/UWS07AnalysenErgebnisseBericht BFSBAFU.pdf.
25. European Commission (2011) Special Eurobarometer 359-Attitudes on data protection and electronic identity in the European Union. Accessed September 20, 2015, http://ec.europa.eu/public-opinion/archives/eb-special-359-340-en.htm
26. European Environment Agency (2015) Final energy consumption bsector and fuel. Accessed February 16, 2016, http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/final-energy-consumption -by-sector-9/assessment
27. Evans L (1979) Driver behavior effects on fuel consumption in urban driving. Human Factors 21(4):389-398.
28. Ferraro PJ, Price MK (2013) Using nonpecuniary strategies to influence behavior: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95(1):64-73.
29. Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).
30. Frank RH, Glass AJ (1991) Microeconomics and Behavior (McGraw-Hill, New York).
31. Gabaix X, Laibson D (2006) Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia, and information suppression in competitive markets. Quart. J. Econom. 121(2):505-540.
32. Gardner GT, Stern PC (2008) The short list: The most effective actions U.S. Households can take to curb climate change. Environment 50(September/October):12-23.
33. Gatersleben B, Steg L, Vlek C (2002) Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior. Environment Behav. 34(3):335-362.
34. Gerber AS, Green DP, Larimer CW (2008) Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 102(1):33-48.
35. Gerber AS, Green DP, Larimer CW (2010) An experiment testing the relative effectiveness of encouraging voter participation by inducing feelings of pride or shame. Political Behav. 32(3): 409-422.
36. Gneezy A, Gneezy U, Nelson LD, Brown A (2010) Shared social responsibility: A field experiment in pay-what-you-want pricing and charitable giving. Science 329(5989):325-327.
37. Gneezy A, Gneezy U, Riener G, Nelson LD (2012) Pay-what-youwant, identity, and self-signaling in markets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(19):7236-7240.
38. Gromet DM, Kunreuther H, Larrick RP (2013) Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110(23):9314-9319.
39. Gutsell JN, Inzlicht M (2013) A neuroaffective perspective on why people fail to live a sustainable lifestyle. Van Trjp HCM, eds. Encouraging Sustainable Behavior: Psychology and the Environment (Psychology Press, New York), 137-154.
40. Harrison GW, List JA (2004) Field experiments. J. Econom. Literature 42(4):1009-1055.
41. Hirsh JB (2010) Personality and environmental concern. J. Environmen. Psych. 30(2):245-248.
42. Hirshleifer D (2008) Psychological bias as a driver of financial regulation. Eur. Financial Management 14(5):856-874.
43. Hirshleifer D, Lim SS, Teoh SH (2009) Driven to distraction: Extraneous events and underreaction to earnings news. J. Finance 64(5):2289-2325.
44. Hirshleifer D, Lim SS, Teoh SH (2011) Limited investor attention and stock market misreactions to accounting information. Rev. Asset Pricing Stud. 1(1):35-73.
45. Jessoe K, Rapson D (2014) Knowledge is (less) power: Experimental evidence from residential energy use. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(4):1417-1438.
46. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (1982) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).
47. Karlin B, Zinger JF, Ford R (2015) The effects of feedback on energy conservation: A meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 141(6):1205-1227.
48. Kehr F (2016) Feeling and thinking: On the role of intuitive processes in shaping decisions about privacy. Doctoral dissertation, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland. Http://www1.unisg.ch/www/edis.nsf/vEDISBySubjectDE/49AD0B112ABC363FC 1257E5B003FC787
49. Kehr F, Kowatsch T, Wentzel D, Fleisch E (2015) Blissfully ignorant: the effects of general privacy concerns, general institutional trust, and affect in the privacy calculus. Inform. Systems J.25(6):607-635.
50. KleimingerW, Santini S, Mattern F (2014) Smart heating control with occupancy prediction: How much can one save? UbiComp '14: Proc. 2014 ACM Internat. Joint Conf. Pervasive Ubiquitous Comput. (ACM, New York), 947-954.
51. Kluger AN, DeNisi A (1996) Feedback intervention theory. Psych. Bull. 119(2):254-284.
52. Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ. Ed. Res. 8(3):239-260.
53. Kolstad CD (2010) Environmental Economics, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, New York).
54. Lapillonne B, Pollier K, Samci N (2015) Energy efficiency trends for households in the EU. Report, ODYSSEE-MURE, ADEME, Angers, France. Http://www.odyssee-mure.eu/publications/efficiency-by-sector/household/household-eu.pdf
55. Lee K, Ashton MC (2004) Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behav. Res. 39(2):329-358.
56. Levitt SD, List JA (2009) Field experiments in economics: The past, the present, and the future. Eur. Econom. Rev. 53(1):1-18.
57. List JA (2011) Why economists should conduct field experiments and 14 tips for pulling one off. J. Econom. Perspect. 25(3):3-15.
58. Loewenstein G (1996) Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 65(3):272-292.
59. Loock C, Landwehr J, Staake T, Fleisch E, Pentland A (2012) The influence of reference frame and population density on the effectiveness of social normative feedback on electricity consumption. Huang M-H, Piccoli G, Sambamurthy V, eds. Proc. 33rd Internat. Conf. Information Systems (ICIS 2012), Orlando, FL, 1-17. Http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2012/proceedings/GreenIS/7/.
60. McKerracher C, Torriti J (2013) Energy consumption feedback in perspective: Integrating Australian data to meta-analyses on inhome displays. Energy Efficiency 6(2):387-405.
61. McKinsey & Company (2009) Pathways to a low-carbon economy: Version 2 of the global greenhouse gas abatement cost curve. Technical report, McKinsey & Company, Chicago.
62. Michel A, Attali S, Bush E (2015) Energy efficiency of white goods in Europe: Monitoring the market with sales data. Technical report, Topten International Services, Zürich. Http://www.topten.eu/uploads/File/WhiteGoods-in-Europe-June15.pdf
63. Milfont TL, Sibley CG (2012) The big five personality traits and environmental engagement: Associations at the individual and societal level. J. Environmen. Psych. 32(2):187-195.
64. Milkman KL, Rogers T, Bazerman MH (2008) Harnessing our inner angels and demons: What we have learned about want/should conflicts and how that knowledge can help us reduce shortsighted decision making. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 3(4):324-338.
65. Mitchell DL, Chesnutt TW (2013) Evaluation of East Bay Municipal Utility District's pilot of WaterSmart home water reports. Technical report, California Water Foundation, Sacramento. Http://waterfoundation.net/wp-content/uploads/PDF/1389391749 -Watersmart-evaluation-report-FINAL-12-12-13(00238356).pdf
66. Naderi I (2011) Green behavior: Concern for the self or others? AMA Summer Educators' Conf. Proc., Vol. 22 (American Marketing Association, Chicago), 163-164.
67. Norcross JC, Vangarelli DJ (1988) The resolution solution: Longitudinal examination of New Year's change attempts. J. Substance Abuse 1(2):127-134.
68. Packer DJ, Fujita K, Herman K (2013) Rebels with a cause: A goal conflict approach to understanding when conscientious people dissent. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 49(5):927-932.
69. Poldin O, Valeeva D, Yudkevich M (2016) Which peers matter: How social ties affect peer-group effects. Res. Higher Ed. 57(4):448-468.
70. Power S (2011) A water fight over luxury showers. Wall Street Journal (July 21), http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704913304575371462611463490.
71. Prognos AG (2015) Analyse des schweizerischen Energieverbrauchs 2000-2014 nach Verwendungszwecken. Final report to the Swiss Federal Office of Energy, Federal Office of Energy, Bern, Switzerland. Http://www.bfe.admin.ch/themen/00526/00541/00542/02167/index.html?lang-de&dossier-id-02169
72. Schleich J, Klobasa M, Goelz S, Brunner M (2013) Effects of feedback on residential electricity demand-Findings from a field trial in Austria. Energy Policy 61(2):1097-1106.
73. Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V (2007) The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psych. Sci. 18(5):429-434.
74. Schultz PW, Messina A, Tronu G, Limas EF, Gupta R, Estrada M (2016) Personalized normative feedback and the moderating role of personal norms: A field experiment to reduce residential water consumption. Environment Behav. 48(5):686-710.
75. Swan M (2013) The quantified self: Fundamental disruption in big data science and biological discovery. Big Data 1(2):85-99.
76. Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (2013) Environment Switzerland 2013. Technical report, Swiss Federal Office for the Environment, Bern, Switzerland. Http://www.bafu.admin.ch/ud-1070-e
77. Tiefenbeck V, Tasic V, Schoeb S, Staake T (2013) Mechatronics to drive environmental sustainability: Measuring, visualizing and transforming consumer patterns on a large scale. Proc. 39th Annual Conf. IEEE Indust. Electronics Soc. "IECON 2013" (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 4768-4773.
78. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2013) Heating and cooling no longer majority of U.S. Home energy use. Technical report, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC. Http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id-10271
79. Wolak FA (2011) Do residential customers respond to hourly prices? Evidence from a dynamic pricing experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(3):83-87.
80. World Economic Forum (2015) Deep shift: Technology tipping points and societal impact. Technical report, World Economic Forum, Geneva. Https://www.weforum.org/reports/deep-shift-technology-tipping-points-and-societal-impact/.
81. Young MS, Birrell SA, StantonNA(2011) Safe driving in a greenworld: Areviewof driver performance benchmarks and technologies to support "smart" driving. Appl. Ergonomics 42(4):533-539.