Analysis of pubmed user sessions using a full-day pubmed query log: A comparison of experienced and nonexperienced pubmed users

JMIR Medical Informatics

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2015, Pages

  Yoo, Illhoi ^a,b   Mosa, Abu Saleh Mohammad ^a,b  

^a University of Missouri   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Experienced users; Information retrieval; MEDLINE; Nonexperienced users; PubMed; PubMed query log

Indexed keywords

EID: 85034266740     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22919694     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/medinform.3740     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Downing R, Moore J, Brown S. The effects and interaction of spatial visualization and domain expertise on information seeking. Comput Human Behav 2005; 21(2):195-209.
2. Rouet J. The Skills of Document Use: From Text Comprehension to Web-Based Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 2006.
3. Tenopir C, King D, Boyce P, Grayson M, Zhang Y, Ebuen M. Patterns of journal use by scientists through three evolutionary phases. D-Lib Magazine 2003 May; 9(5) [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1045/may2003-contents]
4. De Groote SL, Dorsch JL. Measuring use patterns of online journals and databases. J Med Libr Assoc 2003 Apr; 91(2):231-240 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1043/0025-7338(2003)091<0231:MUPOOJ>2.0.CO; 2] [Medline: 12883574]
5. Vibert N, Rouet J, Ros C, Ramond M, Deshoullieres B. The use of online electronic information resources in scientific research: The case of neuroscience. Libr Inf Sci Res 2007 Dec; 29(4):508-532. [doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2007.05.001]
6. Vibert N, Ros C, Bigot L, Ramond M, Gatefin J, Rouet J. Effects of domain knowledge on reference search with the PubMed database: An experimental study. J Am Soc Inf Sci 2009 Jul; 60(7):1423-1447. [doi: 10.1002/asi.21078]
7. Mattox DE. Welcome to ARCHIVES CME. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000 Jul; 126(7):914. [Medline: 10889012]
8. Muin M, Fontelo P, Liu F, Ackerman M. SLIM: An alternative Web interface for MEDLINE/PubMed searches - a preliminary study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2005; 5:37 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-5-37] [Medline: 16321145]
9. Bar-Ilan J, Fink N. Preference for electronic format of scientific journals-A case study of the Science Library users at the Hebrew University. Libr Inf Sci Res 2005 Jun; 27(3):363-376. [doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2005.04.011]
10. Sood A, Ghosh A. Literature search using PubMed: An essential tool for practicing evidence- based medicine. J Assoc Physicians India 2006 Apr; 54:303-308. [Medline: 16944614]
11. Bahaadinbeigy K, Yogesan K, Wootton R. MEDLINE versus EMBASE and CINAHL for telemedicine searches. Telemed J E Health 2010 Oct; 16(8):916-919. [doi: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0046] [Medline: 20925566]
12. Yoo I, Marinov M. Recent research for MEDLINE/PubMed: Short review. USA: ACM; 2010 Presented at: Proceedings of the ACM fourth international workshop on Datatext mining in biomedical informatics; October 26 - 30, 2010; Toronto, ON, Canada p. 69-70. [doi: 10.1145/1871871.1871887]
13. Haux R, Grothe W, Runkel M, Schackert HK, Windeler HJ, Winter A, et al. Knowledge retrieval as one type of knowledge-based decision support in medicine: Results of an evaluation study. Int J Biomed Comput 1996 Apr; 41(2):69-85. [Medline: 8803668]
14. Nankivell C, Wallis P, Mynott G. Networked information and clinical decision making: The experience of Birmingham Heartlands and Solihull National Health Service Trust (Teaching). Med Educ 2001 Feb; 35(2):167-172. [Medline: 11169091]
15. Baker NC, Hemminger BM. Mining connections between chemicals, proteins, and diseases extracted from Medline annotations. J Biomed Inform 2010 Aug; 43(4):510-519 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.03.008] [Medline: 20348023]
16. Herskovic JR, Tanaka LY, Hersh W, Bernstam EV. A day in the life of PubMed: Analysis of a typical day's query log. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14(2):212-220 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2191] [Medline: 17213501]
17. Islamaj DR, Murray G, Névéol A, Lu Z. Understanding PubMed user search behavior through log analysis. Database (Oxford) 2009; 2009:bap018 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/database/bap018] [Medline: 20157491]
18. Lacroix E, Mehnert R. The US National Library of Medicine in the 21st century: Expanding collections, nontraditional formats, new audiences. Health Info Libr J 2002 Sep; 19(3):126-132. [Medline: 12390234]
19. Hersh W, Hickam D. Use of a multi-application computer workstation in a clinical setting. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1994 Oct; 82(4):382-389 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 7841907]
20. McKibbon KA, Haynes RB, Dilks CJ, Ramsden MF, Ryan NC, Baker L, et al. How good are clinical MEDLINE searches? A comparative study of clinical end-user and librarian searches. Comput Biomed Res 1990 Dec; 23(6):583-593. [Medline: 2276266]
21. Pao ML, Grefsheim SF, Barclay ML, Woolliscroft JO, McQuillan M, Shipman BL. Factors affecting students' use of MEDLINE. Comput Biomed Res 1993 Dec; 26(6):541-555. [Medline: 8112055]
22. Gallagher PE, Allen TY, Wyer PC. How to find evidence when you need it, part 2: A clinician's guide to MEDLINE: The basics. Ann Emerg Med 2002 Apr; 39(4):436-440. [Medline: 11919532]
23. Chapman D. Advanced search features of PubMed. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2009 Feb; 18(1):58-59 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 19270851]
24. Hersh WR, Crabtree MK, Hickam DH, Sacherek L, Friedman CP, Tidmarsh P, et al. Factors associated with success in searching MEDLINE and applying evidence to answer clinical questions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002; 9(3):283-293 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 11971889]
25. Richter RR, Austin TM. Using MeSH (medical subject headings) to enhance PubMed search strategies for evidence-based practice in physical therapy. Phys Ther 2012 Jan; 92(1):124-132 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100178] [Medline: 21979271]
26. Darmoni SJ, Soualmia LF, Letord C, Jaulent M, Griffon N, Thirion B, et al. Improving information retrieval using Medical Subject Headings Concepts: A test case on rare and chronic diseases. J Med Libr Assoc 2012 Jul; 100(3):176-183 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.100.3.007] [Medline: 22879806]
27. Hubert G, Cabanac G, Sallaberry C, Palacio D. Query operators shown beneficial for improving search results. In: Gradmann S, editor. Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries: International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2011:118-129.
28. Xie I, Joo S. Factors affecting the selection of search tactics: Tasks, knowledge, process, and systems. Inf Process Manag 2012 Mar; 48(2):254-270. [doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2011.08.009]
29. Hölscher C, Strube G. Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies. Comput Netw 2000 Jun; 33(1-6):337-346. [doi: 10.1016/S1389-1286(00)00031-1]
30. Oldroyd B. Study of strategies used in online searching 5: Differences between the experienced and the inexperienced searcher. Online Rev 1984 Mar; 8(3):233-244. [doi: 10.1108/eb024156]
31. Harter S. Online searching styles: An exploratory study. Coll Res Libr 1984 Jul 01; 45(4):249-258. [doi: 10.5860/crl_45_04_249]
32. Penniman D. Modeling and Evaluation of On-Line User Behavior. Final Report to the National Library of Medicine. Dublin, OH: OCCL; Sep 1981.
33. Hsieh-Yee I. Effects of search experience and subject knowledge on the search tactics of novice and experienced searchers. J Am Soc Inf Sci 1993 Apr; 44(3):161-174 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571]
34. Drabenstott K. Do nondomain experts enlist the strategies of domain experts? J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2003 Jul; 54(9):836-854. [doi: 10.1002/asi.10281]
35. Tabatabai D, Shore B. How experts and novices search the Web. Libr Inf Sci Res 2005 Mar; 27(2):222-248. [doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2005.01.005]
36. Gardois P, Calabrese R, Colombi N, Deplano A, Lingua C, Longo F, et al. Effectiveness of bibliographic searches performed by paediatric residents and interns assisted by librarians. A randomised controlled trial. Health Info Libr J 2011 Dec; 28(4):273-284. [doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2011.00957.x] [Medline: 22051126]
37. Fields B, Keith S, Blandford A. Designing for expert information finding strategies. In: Fincher S, editor. People and Computers XVIII - Design for Life: Proceedings of HCI 2004 (Pt. 18). London, UK: Springer London; 2005:89-102.
38. US National Library of Medicine. National Institutes of Health. 2005 May 17. MEDLINE/PubMed Data Element (Field) DescriptionsURL: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/mms/medlineelements.html [accessed 2014-07-30] [WebCite Cache ID 6RRV0Kbq8]
39. Marchionini G. Information Seeking in Electronic Environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995.
40. Chen C, Rada R. Interacting with hypertext: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Hum Comput Interact 1996 Jun 1; 11(2):125-156. [doi: 10.1207/s15327051hci1102_2]
41. Palmquist R, Kim K. Cognitive style and on-line database search experience as predictors of Web search performance. J Am Soc Inf Sci 2000; 51(6):558-566. [doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:6<558::AID-ASI7>3.0.CO; 2-9]
42. Marchionini G, Dwiggins S, Katz A, Lin X. Information seeking in full-text end-user-oriented search systems: The roles of domain and search expertise. Libr Inf Sci Res 1993; 15(1):35-69.
43. Hembrooke H, Granka L, Gay G, Liddy E. The effects of expertise and feedback on search term selection and subsequent learning. J Am Soc Inf Sci 2005 Jun; 56(8):861-871. [doi: 10.1002/asi.20180]
44. Jenkins C, Corritore C, Wiedenbeck S. Patterns of information seeking on the Web: A qualitative study of domain expertise and Web expertise. Inf Technol Soc 2003; 1(3):64-89.
45. Ju B. Does domain knowledge matter: Mapping users' expertise to their information interactions. J Am Soc Inf Sci 2007 Nov; 58(13):2007-2020. [doi: 10.1002/asi.20680]
46. Patel S, Drury C, Shalin V. Effectiveness of expert semantic knowledge as a navigational aid within hypertext. Behav Inf Tech 1998 Jan; 17(6):313-324. [doi: 10.1080/014492998119274]
47. Wildemuth B, de Bliek R, Friedman C, File D. Medical students' personal knowledge, searching proficiency, and database use in problem solving. J Am Soc Inf Sci 1999; 46(8):590-607. [doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199509)46:8<590::AID-ASI7>3.0.CO; 2-#]
48. Hersh WR, Hickam DH. How well do physicians use electronic information retrieval systems? A framework for investigation and systematic review. JAMA 1998 Oct 21; 280(15):1347-1352. [Medline: 9794316]
49. Saracevic T, Kantor P. A study of information seeking and retrieving. II. Users, questions, and effectiveness. J Am Soc Inf Sci 1988 May; 39(3):177-196. [doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198805)39:3<177::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO; 2-F]
50. Allen B. Topic knowledge and online catalog search formulation. Libr Q 1991 Apr; 61(2):188-213.
51. Aula A, Nordhausen K. Modeling successful performance in Web searching. J Am Soc Inf Sci 2006 Oct 1; 57(12):1678-1693. [doi: 10.1002/asi.20340]
52. Egan D. Individual differences in human-computer interaction. In: Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 1988:543-568.
53. Cullen RJ. In search of evidence: Family practitioners' use of the Internet for clinical information. J Med Libr Assoc 2002 Oct; 90(4):370-379 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 12398243]
54. Davies KS. Physicians and their use of information: A survey comparison between the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. J Med Libr Assoc 2011 Jan; 99(1):88-91 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.99.1.015] [Medline: 21243061]
55. Markey K. Twenty-five years of end-user searching, Part 1: Research findings. J Am Soc Inf Sci 2007 Jun; 58(8):1071-1081. [doi: 10.1002/asi.20462]
56. Macedo-Rouet M, Rouet J, Ros C, Vibert N. How do scientists select articles in the PubMed database? An empirical study of criteria and strategies. Eur Rev Appl Psychol 2012 Apr; 62(2):63-72. [doi: 10.1016/j.erap.2012.01.003]
57. Lasserre K. Expert searching in health librarianship: A literature review to identify international issues and Australian concerns. Health Info Libr J 2012 Mar; 29(1):3-15. [doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2011.00974.x] [Medline: 22335285]
58. McKibbon KA, Haynes RB, Johnston ME, Walker CJ. A study to enhance clinical end-user MEDLINE search skills: Design and baseline findings. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1991:73-77 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 1807700]
59. Silverstein C, Marais H, Henzinger M, Moricz M. Analysis of a very large web search engine query log. SIGIR Forum 1999 Sep 01; 33(1):6-12. [doi: 10.1145/331403.331405]
60. Jansen B, Spink A, Saracevic T. Real life, real users, and real needs: A study and analysis of user queries on the web. Information Processing & Management 2000 Mar; 36(2):207-227. [doi: 10.1016/S0306-4573(99)00056-4]
61. Facca F, Lanzi P. Mining interesting knowledge from weblogs: A survey. Data Knowl Eng 2005 Jun; 53(3):225-241. [doi: 10.1016/j.datak.2004.08.001]
62. Murray G, Teevan J. Query log analysis: Social and technological challenges. SIGIR Forum 2007 Dec 01; 41(2):112-120. [doi: 10.1145/1328964.1328985]
63. Do an R, Murray G, Névéol A, Lu Z. Characterizing user search behavior in PubMed. : American Medical Informatics Association; 2010 Presented at: AMIA 2010 Annual Symposium; 2015 Nov 16; Washington, DC p. 1094.
64. Lu Z, Wilbur W. Improving accuracy for identifying related PubMed queries by an integrated approach. J Biomed Inform 2009 Oct; 42(5):831-838 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.12.006] [Medline: 19162232]
65. Lu Z, Kim W, Wilbur WJ. Evaluation of query expansion using MeSH in PubMed. Inf Retr Boston 2009; 12(1):69-80 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1007/s10791-008-9074-8] [Medline: 19774223]
66. Névéol A, Islamaj DR, Lu Z. Semi-automatic semantic annotation of PubMed queries: A study on quality, efficiency, satisfaction. J Biomed Inform 2011 Apr; 44(2):310-318 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.11.001] [Medline: 21094696]
67. Lu Z, Wilbur WJ, McEntyre JR, Iskhakov A, Szilagyi L. Finding query suggestions for PubMed. 2009 Nov 14 Presented at: AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2009; San Francisco, USA p. 396-400.
68. Lu Z, Xie N, Wilbur WJ. Identifying related journals through log analysis. Bioinformatics 2009 Nov 15; 25(22):3038-3039 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp529] [Medline: 19734155]
69. Mosa ASM, Yoo I. A study on PubMed search tag usage pattern: Association rule mining of a full-day PubMed query log. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013; 13:8 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-8] [Medline: 23302604]
70. Broder A. A taxonomy of web search. SIGIR Forum 2002 Sep 01; 36(2):3-10. [doi: 10.1145/792550.792552]
71. PubMed. U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institute of Health. PubMed HelpURL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK3827/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK3827.pdf [accessed 2015-06-18] [WebCite Cache ID 6ZOCemft9]
72. Spink A, Bateman J, Jansen B. Searching heterogeneous collections on the Web: Behaviour of Excite users. Inf Res 1998 Oct; 4(2):12-27.
73. Swanson D. Information retrieval as a trial-and-error process. Libr Q 1977; 47(2):128-148.
74. Downey D, Dumais S, Horvitz E. Models of searching and browsing: Languages, studies, and applications. In: Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on Artifical intelligence. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc; 2007 Presented at: IJCAI; 2007 Jan 6-12; Hyderabad, India p. 2740-2747.
75. Huang C, Chien L, Oyang Y. Relevant term suggestion in interactive web search based on contextual information in query session logs. J Am Soc Inf Sci 2003 May; 54(7):638-649. [doi: 10.1002/asi.10256]
76. Buzikashvili N, Jansen B. Limits of the web log analysis artifacts. 2006 Presented at: Workshop on Logging Traces of Web Activity: The Mechanics of Data Collection; 2006; Edinburgh, Scotland.
77. He D, Göker A. Detecting session boundaries from web user logs. 2000 Apr 05 Presented at: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Colloquium on Information Retrieval Research; 2000; Cambridge p. 57-66.
78. Radlinski F, Joachims T. Query chains: Learning to rank from implicit feedback. New York, NY: ACM Press; 2005 Presented at: Proceedings of the eleventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery in data mining; 2005 Aug 21-24; Chicago, IL, USA p. 239-248. [doi: 10.1145/1081870.1081899]
79. Shi X, Yang C. Mining related queries from search engine query logs. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press; 2006 Presented at: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web - WWW; May 23-26, 2006; Edinburgh, Scotland p. 943-944. [doi: 10.1145/1135777.1135956]
80. Gayo-Avello D. A survey on session detection methods in query logs and a proposal for future evaluation. Inf Sci 2009 May 30; 179(12):1822-1843. [doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2009.01.026]
81. Catledge L, Pitkow J. Characterizing browsing strategies in the World-Wide Web. Proc Int World Wide Web Conf 1995 Apr; 27(6):1065-1073. [doi: 10.1016/0169-7552(95)00043-7]
82. Jansen B, Spink A. An analysis of Web information seeking and use: Documents retrieved versus documents viewed. 2003 Presented at: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Internet Computing; 2003 Jun 23-26; Las Vegas, Nevada, USA p. 65-69.
83. Jansen B, Spink A, Blakely C, Koshman S. Defining a session on Web search engines. J Am Soc Inf Sci 2007 Apr; 58(6):862-871. [doi: 10.1002/asi.20564]
84. Ahmadi S, Faghankhani M, Javanbakht A, Akbarshahi M, Mirghorbani M, Safarnejad B, et al. A comparison of answer retrieval through four evidence-based textbooks (ACP PIER, Essential Evidence Plus, First Consult, and UpToDate): A randomized controlled trial. Med Teach 2011; 33(9):724-730. [doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.531155] [Medline: 21854150]
85. Haynes RB, McKibbon KA, Walker CJ, Ryan N, Fitzgerald D, Ramsden MF. Online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings. A study of use and usefulness. Ann Intern Med 1990 Jan 1; 112(1):78-84. [Medline: 2403476]
86. Bernstam E, Kamvar S, Meric F, Dugan J, Chizek S, Stave C. Oncology patient interface to MEDLINE. 2001 Presented at: Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology; 2001; USA p. 244a.
87. Agoritsas T, Merglen A, Courvoisier DS, Combescure C, Garin N, Perrier A, et al. Sensitivity and predictive value of 15 PubMed search strategies to answer clinical questions rated against full systematic reviews. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14(3):e85 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.2021] [Medline: 22693047]
88. Shariff SZ, Sontrop JM, Haynes RB, Iansavichus AV, McKibbon KA, Wilczynski NL, et al. Impact of PubMed search filters on the retrieval of evidence by physicians. CMAJ 2012 Feb 21; 184(3):E184-E190 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101661] [Medline: 22249990]
89. Ugolini D, Neri M, Casilli C, Bonassi S. Development of search filters for retrieval of literature on the molecular epidemiology of cancer. Mutat Res 2010 Aug 30; 701(2):107-110. [doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.05.016] [Medline: 20685344]
90. Thiele RH, Poiro NC, Scalzo DC, Nemergut EC. Speed, accuracy, and confidence in Google, Ovid, PubMed, and UpToDate: Results of a randomised trial. Postgrad Med J 2010 Aug; 86(1018):459-465. [doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2010.098053] [Medline: 20709767]
91. Shariff SZ, Bejaimal SA, Sontrop JM, Iansavichus AV, Haynes RB, Weir MA, et al. Retrieving clinical evidence: A comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar for quick clinical searches. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15(8):e164 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.2624] [Medline: 23948488]
92. Duran-Nelson A, Gladding S, Beattie J, Nixon LJ. Should we Google it? Resource use by internal medicine residents for point-of-care clinical decision making. Acad Med 2013 Jun; 88(6):788-794. [doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828ffdb7] [Medline: 23619072]
93. Cook DA, Sorensen KJ, Hersh W, Berger RA, Wilkinson JM. Features of effective medical knowledge resources to support point of care learning: A focus group study. PLoS One 2013; 8(11):e80318 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080318] [Medline: 24282535]
94. Sayyah EL, Faghankhani M, Javanbakht A, Ahmadi S, Baradaran HR. To compare PubMed Clinical Queries and UpToDate in teaching information mastery to clinical residents: A crossover randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2011; 6(8):e23487 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023487] [Medline: 21858142]
95. Nourbakhsh E, Nugent R, Wang H, Cevik C, Nugent K. Medical literature searches: A comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar. Health Info Libr J 2012 Sep; 29(3):214-222. [doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2012.00992.x] [Medline: 22925384]
96. Thiele RH, Poiro NC, Scalzo DC, Nemergut EC. Speed, accuracy, and confidence in Google, Ovid, PubMed, and UpToDate: Results of a randomised trial. Postgrad Med J 2010 Aug; 86(1018):459-465. [doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2010.098053] [Medline: 20709767]
97. Cook DA, Sorensen KJ, Hersh W, Berger RA, Wilkinson JM. Features of effective medical knowledge resources to support point of care learning: A focus group study. PLoS One 2013; 8(11):e80318 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080318] [Medline: 24282535]
98. van Dijk N, Hooft L, Wieringa-de WM. What are the barriers to residents' practicing evidence-based medicine? A systematic review. Acad Med 2010 Jul; 85(7):1163-1170. [doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d4152f] [Medline: 20186032]