The Human Behaviour-Change Project: Harnessing the power of artificial intelligence and machine learning for evidence synthesis and interpretation

Implementation Science

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Michie, Susan ^a   Thomas, James ^a   Johnston, Marie ^b   Aonghusa, Pol Mac ^c   Shawe Taylor, John ^a   Kelly, Michael P ^d   Deleris, Léa A ^c   Finnerty, Ailbhe N ^a   Marques, Marta M ^a   Norris, Emma ^a   O'Mara Eves, Alison ^a   West, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^c IBM RESEARCH   (Ireland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Artificial intelligence; Behaviour change interventions; Evidence synthesis; Implementation; Machine learning; Natural language processing; Ontology

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; EFFECT SIZE; EXTRACTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KNOWLEDGE BASE; MACHINE LEARNING; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; ONTOLOGY; PHYSICIAN; PREDICTION; SCIENTIST; SYNTHESIS; ALGORITHM; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE POLICY;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; MACHINE LEARNING;

EID: 85034114839     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0641-5     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Glasziou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Clarke M, Julious S, Michie S, Moher D, Wager E. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet. 2014;18;383(9913):267-76.
2. The Lancet. www.thelancet.com/campaigns/efficiency/statement. Accessed 21 July 2017.
3. Elliott JH, Turner T, Clavisi O, et al. Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap. PLoS Med. 2014;11(2):e1001603.
4. Bragge P, Clavisi O, Turner T, Tavender E, Collie A, Gruen RL. The Global Evidence Mapping Initiative: scoping research in broad topic areas. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:92.
5. Takwoingi Y, Hopewell S, Tovey D, Sutton AJ. A multicomponent decision tool for prioritising the updating of systematic reviews. BMJ. 2013;347:f7191.
6. Equator Network. www.equator-network.org. Accessed 21 July 2017.
7. Ioannidis JP, Greenland S, Hlatky MA, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):166-75.
8. Caldwell DM, Welton NJ. Approaches for synthesising complex mental health interventions in meta-analysis. Evid Based Ment Health. 2016;19(1):16-21.
9. The Human Behaviour-Change Project. www.humanbehaviourchange.org. Accessed 21 July 2017.
10. Arp R, Smith B, Spear AD. Building ontologies with basic formal ontology. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2015.
11. Larsen KR, Michie S, Hekler EB, Gibson B, Spruijt-Metz D, Ahern D, Cole-Lewis H, Bartlett Ellis RJ, Hesse B, Moser RP, Yi J. Behavior change interventions: the potential of ontologies for advancing science and practice. J Beh Med. 2016;40(1):6-22.
12. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, Harris MA, Hill DP, Issel-Tarver L, Kasarskis A, Lewis S, Matese JC, Richardson JE, Ringwald M, Rubin GM, Sherlock G. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000;25(1):25-9.
13. OBO Foundry. www.obofoundry.org. Accessed 21 July 2017.
14. Okhmatovskaia A, Shaban-Nejad A, Lavigne M, Buckeridge DL. Addressing the challenge of encoding causal epidemiological knowledge in formal ontologies: a practical perspective. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;205:1125-9.
15. Hastings J, Ceusters W, Smith B, Mulligan K. The Emotion Ontology: Enabling Interdisciplinary Research in the Affective Sciences. Modeling and Using Context: 7th International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT 2011, Karlsruhe, Germany; 2011: Berlin.
16. Hastings J, Smith B, Ceusters W, Jensen M, Mulligan K. Representing mental functioning: Ontologies for mental health and disease. ICBO 2012: 3rd International Conference on Biomedical Ontology; Citeseer; 2012.
17. West R, Hajek P, Stead L, Stapleton J. Outcome criteria in smoking cessation trials: proposal for a common standard. Addiction. 2005;100(3):299-303.
18. West R, Raw M, McNeill A, Stead L, Aveyard P, Britton J, Stapleton J, McRobbie H, Pokhrel S, Lester-George A, Borland R. Health-care interventions to promote and assist tobacco cessation: a review of efficacy, effectiveness and affordability for use in national guideline development. Addiction. 2015;110(9):1388-403.
19. CNBC. http://www.cnbc.com/2014/06/10/you-may-soon-get-financial-advice-from-a-machine.html. Accessed 21 July 2017.
20. Wired. http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-02/11/ibm-watson-medical-doctor. Accessed 21 July 2017.
21. Hood L, Flores M. A personal view on systems medicine and the emergence of proactive P4 medicine: predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory. New Biotechnol. 2012;29(6):613-24.
22. Shaikh AR, Butte AJ, Schully SD, Dalton WS, Khoury MJ, Hesse BW. Collaborative biomedicine in the age of big data: the case of cancer. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(4):e101.
23. Lassoued Y, Deleris L. Thesaurus-Based Hierarchical Semantic Grouping of Medical Terms in Information Extraction. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;228:446-560.
24. Deleris L, Deparis S, Sacaleanu B, Tounsi L. Risk Information Extraction and Aggregation. Algorithmic Decision Theory: Third International Conference, ADT 2013. Bruxelles: Springer; 2013.
25. High R, Rapp B. Transforming the Way Organizations Think with Cognitive Systems. IBM Academy of Technology: IBM RedBooks; 2012.
26. Deleris L, Jochim C. Probability Statements Extraction with Constrained Conditional Random Fields. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;228:527-31.
27. Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/. Accessed 21 July 2017.
28. Michie S, Carey RN, Johnston M, Rothman AJ, De Bruin M, Kelly MP, Connell L. From Theory-Inspired to Theory-Based Interventions: A Protocol for Developing and Testing a Methodology for Linking Behaviour Change Techniques to Theoretical Mechanisms of Action. Ann Behav Med. 2016: 1-12.
29. Michie S, Wood C, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W. Behaviour Change Techniques: The Development and Evaluation of a Taxonomic Method for Reporting and Describing Behaviour Change Interventions. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19(99):1-188.
30. King M. General principles of user-oriented evaluation. In: Dybkjær L, Hemsen H, Minke W, editors. Evaluation of text and speech systems. New York: Springer; 2007. p. 125-61.
31. Nilsson NJ. Principles of artificial intelligence. Palo Alto: Morgan Kauffman; 2014.
32. Davis RE, Campbell R, Hildon Z, Hobbs L, Michie S. Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: a scoping review. Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9:323-34.
33. West R, Michie S. A guide to development and evaluation of digital behaviour change interventions in healthcare. London: Silverback Publishing; 2015.
34. Michie S, Johnston M, Carey R. Behaviour change techniques. In: Gellman M, Turner JR, editors. Encyclopedia of behavioural medicine. New York: Springer; 2016. p. 1-8.
35. Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, Eccles MP, Cane J, Wood CE. The behaviour change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behaviour change interventions. Ann Beh Med. 2013;46:86-95.
36. Cochrane Collaboration. http://uk.cochrane.org/about-us. Accessed 21 July 2017.
37. Alpaydin E. Introduction to machine learning. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2014.
38. Chowdhury G. Natural language processing. Ann Rev Info Sci Tech. 2003;37:51-89.
39. Allemang D, Hendler J. Semantic web for the working ontologist. 2nd ed. Waltham: Morgan Kaufmann; 2011.
40. Cochrane Collaboration. http://linkeddata.cochrane.org/pico-ontology. Accessed 21 July 2017.
41. Cochrane Collaboration. http://handbook.cochrane.org/front_page.htm. Accessed 21 July 2017.
42. Stravi Z, Michie S. Classification systems in behavioural sciences; Current systems and lessons from the natural, medical and social sciences. Health Psychol Rev. 2012;6113-140.
43. Shneidermann B. Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction. New York: Pearson Education; 2010.