Meeting summary: State and local implementation strategies for increasing access to contraception during zika preparedness and response -United States, september 2016

Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

Volumn 66, Issue 44, 2017, Pages 1230-1235

  Kroelinger, Charlan D ^a   Romero, Lisa ^a   Lathrop, Eva ^b   Cox, Shanna ^a   Morgan, Isabel ^c   Frey, Meghan T ^d   Warner, Lee ^a   Curtis, Kathryn M ^a   Pazol, Karen ^a   Barfield, Wanda D ^a   Meaney Delman, Dana ^e   Jamieson, Denise J ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION   (United States)

^b CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

^d NATIONAL CENTER ON BIRTH DEFECTS AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES   (United States)

^e NATIONAL CENTER FOR EMERGING AND ZOONOTIC INFECTIOUS DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTION; EPIDEMIC; FEMALE; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; UNITED STATES; UNPLANNED PREGNANCY; UTILIZATION; ZIKA FEVER;

CONTRACEPTION; DISEASE OUTBREAKS; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS, INFECTIOUS; PREGNANCY, UNPLANNED; STATE GOVERNMENT; UNITED STATES; ZIKA VIRUS INFECTION;

EID: 85033713752     PISSN: 01492195     EISSN: 1545861X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6644a6     Document Type: Note

References (10)

1. Rasmussen SA, Jamieson DJ, Honein MA, Petersen LR. Zika virus and birth defects-reviewing the evidence for causality. N Engl J Med 2016;374:1981-7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsr1604338
2. Boulet SL, D’Angelo DV, Morrow B, et al. Contraceptive use among nonpregnant and postpartum women at risk for unintended pregnancy, and female high school students, in the context of Zika preparedness-United States, 2011-2013 and 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65:780-7. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6530e2
3. Barbour RS, Barbour M. Evaluating and synthesizing qualitative research: the need to develop a distinctive approach. J Eval Clin Pract 2003;9:179-86. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00371.x
4. Rodriguez MI, Evans M, Espey E. Advocating for immediate postpartum LARC: increasing access, improving outcomes, and decreasing cost. Contraception 2014;90:468-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.001
5. Ellington SR, Kourtis AP, Curtis KM, et al. Contraceptive availability during an emergency response in the United States. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2013;22:189-93. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2012.4178
6. Dehlendorf C, Fox E, Sobel L, Borrero S. Patient-centered contraceptive counseling: evidence to inform practice. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep 2016;5:55-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13669-016-0139-1
7. Moniz MH, Dalton VK, Davis MM, et al. Characterization of Medicaid policy for immediate postpartum contraception. Contraception 2015;92:523-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.09.014
8. Curtis KM, Tepper NK, Jatlaoui TC, et al. U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep 2016; 65(No. RR-03).
9. Curtis KM, Jatlaoui TC, Tepper NK, et al. U.S. selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep 2016;65(No. RR-04).
10. Gavin L, Moskosky S, Carter M, et al. Providing quality family planning services: recommendations of CDC and the U.S. Office of Population Affairs. MMWR Recomm Rep 2014; 63(No. RR-04)