Revealing group travel behavior patterns with public transit smart card data

Travel Behaviour and Society

Volumn 10, Issue , 2018, Pages 42-52

  Zhang, Yongping ^a,b,c   Martens, Karel ^c,d   Long, Ying ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^d TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^e TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Beijing; Group travel behavior; Identification; Proxemics; Smart card data

Indexed keywords

EID: 85033570922     PISSN: 2214367X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tbs.2017.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Axhausen, K.W., Gärling, T., Activity-based approaches to travel analysis: conceptual frameworks, models, and research problems. Transp. Rev. 12 (1992), 323–341.
2. Beijing Transportation Research Centre, 2011. Annual report of Beijing's transportation development (In Chinese). Beijing.
3. Bruneau, J., Olivier, A.-H., Pettre, J., Going through, going around: a study on individual avoidance of groups. Vis. Comput. Graph. IEEE Trans. On 21 (2015), 520–528.
4. Buliung, R.N., Kanaroglou, P.S., A GIS toolkit for exploring geographies of household activity/travel behavior. J. Transp. Geogr. 14 (2006), 35–51.
5. Chatman, D.G., Deconstructing development density: quality, quantity and price effects on household non-work travel. Transp. Res. Part Policy Pract. 42 (2008), 1008–1030.
6. Cheyne, J.A., Efran, M.G., The effect of spatial and interpersonal variables on the invasion of group controlled territories. Sociometry, 1972, 477–489.
7. Chu, K., Chapleau, R., Augmenting transit trip characterization and travel behavior comprehension: Multiday location-stamped smart card transactions. Transp. Res. Rec. J Transp. Res. Board, 2010, 29–40.
8. Ciari, F., Zurich, I., 2012. Why do people carpool: Results from a Swiss survey. In: 12th Swiss Transport Research Conference, Ascona.
9. Correia, G., Viegas, J.M., Carpooling and carpool clubs: clarifying concepts and assessing value enhancement possibilities through a Stated Preference web survey in Lisbon. Portugal. Transp. Res. Part Policy Pract. 45 (2011), 81–90.
10. Costa, M., Interpersonal Distances in Group Walking. J. Nonverbal Behav. 34 (2010), 15–26, 10.1007/s10919-009-0077-y.
11. Ettema, D., Timmermans, H., 1997. Activity-based approaches to travel analysis:[selected papers presented at the workshop, May 1995].
12. Ewing, R., Cervero, R., Travel and the built environment: a meta-analysis. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 76 (2010), 265–294.
13. Ferguson, E., The rise and fall of the American carpool: 1970–1990. Transportation 24 (1997), 349–376.
14. Golob, T.F., Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research. Transp. Res. Part B Method 37 (2003), 1–25.
15. Hall, E.T., The Hidden Dimension. 1966, Anchor Books, New York.
16. Hall, E.T., The Silent Language. 1959, Anchor Books, New York.
17. Handy, S., Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behavior. Transp. Res. Part Transp. Environ. 1 (1996), 151–165.
18. Kang, H., Scott, D.M., An integrated spatio-temporal GIS toolkit for exploring intra-household interactions. Transportation 35 (2008), 253–268.
19. Katevas, K., Haddadi, H., Tokarchuk, L., Clegg, R.G., Walking in Sync: two is company, three's a crowd. ACM Press, 2015, 25–29.
20. Kerkman, K., Martens, K., Meurs, H., Factors influencing stop-level transit ridership in Arnhem-Nijmegen City Region, Netherlands. Transp. Res. Rec. J Transp. Res. Board, 2015, 23–32.
21. Kusakabe, T., Asakura, Y., Behavioural data mining of transit smart card data: A data fusion approach. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 46 (2014), 179–191.
22. Langlois, G.G., Koutsopoulos, H.N., Zhao, J., Inferring patterns in the multi-week activity sequences of public transport users. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 64 (2016), 1–16.
23. Ma, X., Wu, Y.-J., Wang, Y., Chen, F., Liu, J., Mining smart card data for transit riders’ travel patterns. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 36 (2013), 1–12.
24. Manenti, L., Manzoni, S., Vizzari, G., Ohtsuka, K., Shimura, K., An agent-based proxemic model for pedestrian and group dynamics: motivations and first experiments. Multi-Agent-Based Simulation XII, 2012, Springer, 74–89.
25. Morency, C., Trépanier, M., Agard, B., Measuring transit use variability with smart-card data. Transp. Policy 14 (2007), 193–203.
26. Moussaïd, M., Perozo, N., Garnier, S., Helbing, D., Theraulaz, G., 2010. The walking behaviour of pedestrian social groups and its impact on crowd dynamics.
27. Pelletier, M.-P., Trépanier, M., Morency, C., Smart card data use in public transit: a literature review. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 19 (2011), 557–568.
28. Polzer, U., 2011. Nonverbal behavior in public space as a function of density and group size, Universität Wien, Wien.
29. Reuter, V., Bergner, B.S., Köster, G., Seitz, M., Treml, F., Hartmann, D., On modeling groups in crowds: empirical evidence and simulation results including large groups. Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2012, 2014, Springer, 835–845.
30. Sarmady, S., Haron, F., Talib, A.Z.H., 2009. Modeling groups of pedestrians in least effort crowd movements using cellular automata. In: Modelling & Simulation, 2009. AMS'09. Third Asia International Conference on. IEEE, pp. 520–525.
31. Sun, L., Axhausen, K.W., Lee, D.-H., Huang, X., Understanding metropolitan patterns of daily encounters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110 (2013), 13774–13779.
32. Tao, S., Corcoran, J., Hickman, M., Stimson, R., The influence of weather on local geographical patterns of bus usage. J. Transp. Geogr. 54 (2016), 66–80, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.05.009.
33. Thompson, S., The Applications of Proxemics and Territoriality in Designing Efficient Layouts for Interior Design Studios and a Prototype Design Studio. 2013, California State University, Northridge.
34. Timmermans, H.J., Zhang, J., Modeling household activity travel behavior: examples of state of the art modeling approaches and research agenda. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 43 (2009), 187–190.
35. Vizzari, G., Manenti, L., Crociani, L., Adaptive pedestrian behaviour for the preservation of group cohesion. Complex Adapt. Syst. Model. 1 (2013), 1–29.
36. Vizzari, G., Manenti, L., Ohtsuka, K., Shimura, K., An agent-based pedestrian and group dynamics model applied to experimental and real-world scenarios. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 19 (2015), 32–45.
37. Waddell, P., UrbanSim: modeling urban development for land use, transportation, and environmental planning. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 68 (2002), 297–314.
38. Wang, R., Shaping carpool policies under rapid motorization: the case of Chinese cities. Transp. Policy 18 (2011), 631–635.
39. Whyte, W., The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. 1980, The Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC.
40. Xu, S., Duh, H.B.-L., A simulation of bonding effects and their impacts on pedestrian dynamics. Intell. Transp. Syst. IEEE Trans. On 11 (2010), 153–161.
41. Zanlungo, F., Brščić, D., Kanda, T., Pedestrian group behaviour analysis under different density conditions. Transp. Res. Procedia 2 (2014), 149–158, 10.1016/j.trpro.2014.09.020.
42. Zhou, J., Murphy, E., Long, Y., Commuting efficiency in the Beijing metropolitan area: an exploration combining smartcard and travel survey data. J. Transp. Geogr. 41 (2014), 175–183.