Interactive reflection trainings on RRI for multiple stakeholder groups

Journal of Responsible Innovation

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 295-311

  Marschalek, Ilse ^a   Schrammel, Maria ^a   Unterfrauner, Elisabeth ^a   Hofer, Margit ^a  

^a Centre for Social Innovation   (Austria)

Author keywords

Multi stakeholder workshop; mutual learning; reflection and anticipation; RRI implementation; RRI training

Indexed keywords

EID: 85032709216     PISSN: 23299460     EISSN: 23299037     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2017.1326262     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Boal, Augusto., 1999. Der Regenbogen Der Wünsche.: Methoden Aus Theater Und Therapie. Seelze: Kallmeyer.
2. Boud, D., R., Cohen, and J., Sampson. 1988. “Peer Learning and Assessment.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 24 (4): 413–426. doi: 10.1080/0260293990240405
3. Callon, Michel, and Analivia, Lacoste. 2012. “Defending Responsible Innovation.” Debating Innovation 1 (1): 19–24.
4. Cooperrider, David L., and Suresh, Srivastva. 1987. “Appreciative Inquiry in Organizational Life.” In Research in Organizational Change and Development, Vol. 1, 129–169. JAI Press Inc. http://scholar.google.at/scholar_url?url=http://www.margiehartley.com/home/wp-content/uploads/file/APPRECIATIVE_INQUIRY_IN_Orgnizational_life.pdf&hl=de&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm1HakunNJdwz_-O-vXMD2MTJUMSZA&nossl=1&oi=scholarr&ved=0ahUKEwjrg_bCss_NAhWH7xQKHQuHDlQQgAMIHSgAMAA.
5. Creek, Michael, ilse, Marschalek, Katharina, Handler, Melanie, Smallman, Norbert, Steinhaus, Jean-Pierre, Alix, Luc, Van Dyck, et al. 2014. “D 2.1–Guidelines for the Implementation of the Stakeholder Consultation in Relation to RRI.” Deliverable D 2.1. Ecsite, ZSI, University College London, CIPAST, Euroscience, European Business Network, European Schoolnet.
6. Diamond, David., 2013. Theater Zum Leben. Über Die Kunst Und Die Wissenschaft Des Dialogs in Gemeinwesen. Stuttgart: ibidem.
7. Dostál, J., 2015. Inquiry-Based Instruction: Concept, Essence, Importance and Contribution Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci.
8. EPSRC. 2015. “Framework for Responsible Innovation.” EPSRC. Accessed December 2016. https://www.epsrc.ac.uk/index.cfm/research/framework/.
9. European Commission. 2013. Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
10. European Union, European Commission, and Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. 2013. Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
11. Freire, P., 1984. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum Publishing Company.
12. Garcia, Daniel, Eva, Zuazua, Belen, Perat, and Ignasi, Lopez, eds. 2016. A Practical Guide to Responsible Research and Innovation. Key Lessons from RRI Tools. Spain: RRI Tools.
13. Höykinpuro, Ritva, and Arja, Ropo. 2014. “Visual Narratives on Organizational Space.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 27 (5): 780–792. doi: 10.1108/JOCM-09-2014-0174
14. Human, Brett A., and Amanda, Davies. 2010. “Stakeholder Consultation During the Planning Phase of Scientific Programs.” Marine Policy 34 (3): 645–654. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.12.003
15. Johnstone, Keith, Christine, Schreyer, and Petra, Schreyer. 2014. Theaterspiele: Spontaneität, Improvisation und Theatersport. 9. Aufl. Berlin: Alexander-Verl.
16. Klaassen, Pim, Frank, Kupper, and Jacqueline, Broerse. 2014. “Policy Brief on the State of the Art on RRI and a Working Definition of RRI.” Deliverable D 1.1. RRI Tools. Amsterdam: Athena Institute, VU University Amsterdam. http://www.rri-tools.eu/workplan-deliverables.
17. Marschalek, ilse., 2015. “Assessing Stakeholders’ Needs and Constraints Related to RRI. Experiences and First Results of a Pan-European Stakeholder Consultation.” In The next Horizon of Technology Assessment, 93–100. Proceedings from the PACITA Conference in Berlin. Prague: Technology Centre ASCR.
18. Marschalek, ilse., 2017. Public Engagement in Responsible Research and Innovation A Critical Reflection From the Practitioner’s Point of View. Vienna: University of Vienna.
19. Marschalek, ilse, Katharina, Handler, Margit, Hofer, Daniel, Garcia Jimenez, Michael, Creek, and Luisa, Marino. 2015. Hubs Manual for the M9–10 Consultation Workshop. RRI Tools. https://www.rri-tools.eu/documents/10184/16301/RRITools_HubsConsultationManual/.
20. O'Donnell, A. M., and A., King. 1999. Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Owen, Richard., 2014. “The UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council’s Commitment to a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 113–117. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882065
22. Owen, Richard, Phil, Macnaghten, and Jack, Stilgoe. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs093
23. Schrammel, Maria, ilse, Marschalek, Elisabeth, Unterfrauner, and Margit, Hofer, eds. 2016. Self-Reflection Tool. Fostering Responsible Research and Innovation. Vienna: Rema print.
24. Smallman, Melanie, Kaatje, Lomme, and Natacha, Faullimmel. 2015. “D 2.2. Report on the Analysis of Opportunities, Obstacles and Needs of the Stakeholder Groups in RRI Practices in Europe.” http://www.rri-tools.eu/documents/10182/18424/RRITools_D2.2-AnalysisNeeds+ConstraintsStakeholderGroupsRRI.pdf/d5aadef5–12c4–4045-a813–15a55fc534ff.
25. Stahl, Bernd., 2013. “Responsible Research and Innovation: The Role of Privacy in an Emerging Framework.” Science and Public Policy 40 (6): 708–716. doi: 10.1093/scipol/sct067
26. Stilgoe, Jack, Richard, Owen, and Phil, Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
27. Sutcliffe, Hilary., 2011. “A Report on Responsible Research and Innovation by Hilary Sutcliffe.” https://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/rri-report-hilary-sutcliffe_en.pdf.
28. Von Schomberg, Rene., 2011. “Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and innovation.” In Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methode, 39–61. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
29. Wickson, Fern, and Anna L., Carew. 2014. “Quality Criteria and Indicators for Responsible Research and Innovation: Learning From Transdisciplinarity.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (3): 254–273. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.963004