Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer the rolarr randomized clinical trial

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

Volumn 318, Issue 16, 2017, Pages 1569-1580

  Jayne, David ^a   Pigazzi, Alessio ^b   Marshall, Helen ^c   Croft, Julie ^c   Corrigan, Neil ^c   Copeland, Joanne ^c   Quirke, Phil ^c   West, Nick ^c   Rautio, Tero ^d   Thomassen, Niels ^e   Tilney, Henry ^f   Gudgeon, Mark ^f   Bianchi, Paolo Pietro ^g   Edlin, Richard ^h   Hulme, Claire ⁱ   Brown, Julia ^c  

^a ST JAMES S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^d OULU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^e AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^f FRIMLEY PARK HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^g MISERICORDIA HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^h UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER DYSFUNCTION; CANCER SURGERY; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASE; HEART DISEASE; HUMAN; IATROGENIC DISEASE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PARALLEL DESIGN; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECTUM CANCER; RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASE; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL RISK; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY TRACT DISEASE; ABDOMINAL SURGERY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE COST; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RISK; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

AGED; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; DIRECT SERVICE COSTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RISK; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 85032636996     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.7219     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, et al; COLOR II Study Group. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(14):1324-1332.
2. Jeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): Survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(7):767-774.
3. Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, et al; ALaCaRT Investigators. Effect of laparoscopicassisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: The ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314 (13):1356-1363.
4. Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(13):1346-1355.
5. Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A, et al. Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(6):1614-1620.
6. Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: Short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(6):1480-1487.
7. Ortiz-Oshiro E, Sánchez-Egido I, Moreno-Sierra J, Pérez CF, Díaz JS, Fernández-Represa JÁ. Robotic assistance may reduce conversion to open in rectal carcinoma laparoscopic surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Robot. 2012;8(3):360-370.
8. Yang Y, Wang F, Zhang P, et al. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: Ameta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(12):3727-3736.
9. Luca F, ValvoM, Ghezzi TL, et al. Impact of robotic surgery on sexual and urinary functions after fully robotic nerve-sparing total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2013;257(4): 672-678.
10. Kim JY, Kim N-K, Lee KY, Hur H, Min BS, Kim JH. A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: Laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(8): 2485-2493.
11. Kim CW, Baik SH, Roh YH, et al. Cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery for rectal cancer focusing on short-term outcomes: A propensity score-matching analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(22):e823.
12. Pai A, Marecik SJ, Park JJ, Melich G, Sulo S, Prasad LM. Oncologic and clinicopathologic outcomes of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015; 58(7):659-667.
13. Collinson FJ, Jayne DG, Pigazzi A, et al. An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27(2):233-241.
14. Barrie J, Jayne DG, Wright J, Murray CJ, Collinson FJ, Pavitt SH. Attaining surgical competency and its implications in surgical clinical trial design: A systematic review of the learning curve in laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(3):829-840.
15. World Health Organization. BMI classification. http://apps.who.int/bmi/index.jsp?introPage=intro -3.html. Accessed September 29, 2017.
16. Royal College of Pathologists. Dataset for colorectal cancer histopathology reports (3rd edition). 2007. https://www.rcpath.org /resourceLibrary/dataset-for-colorectal-cancer -histopathology-reports-3rd-edition-.html. Accessed September 29, 2017.
17. BarryMJ, Fowler FJ Jr, O'LearyMP, et al; Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 1992;148(5):1549-1557.
18. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): A multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997; 49(6):822-830.
19. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000;26(2): 191-208.
20. Quirke P, Dixon MF. The prediction of local recurrence in rectal adenocarcinoma by histopathological examination. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1988;3(2):127-131.
21. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al; MRC CLASICC Trial Group. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): Multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9472):1718-1726.
22. Wu S, Crespi CM, Wong WK. Comparison of methods for estimating the intraclass correlation coefficient for binary responses in cancer prevention cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012;33(5):869-880.
23. Cook JA, Bruckner T, MacLennan GS, Seiler CM. Clustering in surgical trials-database of intracluster correlations. Trials. 2012;13:2.
24. van der Pas MH, Haglind E, CuestaMA, et al; Colorectal Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): Short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(3):210-218.
25. Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P. What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer?. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(2):303-312.
26. Memon S, Heriot AG, Murphy DG, Bressel M, Lynch AC. Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: Ameta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(7):2095-2101.
27. Keller DS, Hashemi L, Lu M, Delaney CP. Short-term outcomes for robotic colorectal surgery by provider volume. J AmColl Surg. 2013;217(6):1063-1069, e1.
28. Park SY, Choi GS, Park JS, Kim HJ, Ryuk JP, Yun SH. Urinary and erectile function in men after total mesorectal excision by laparoscopic or robot-assisted methods for the treatment of rectal cancer: A case-matched comparison. World J Surg. 2014;38(7):1834-1842.
29. Intuitive Surgical. Intuitive Surgical investor presentation, Q1 2017. http://phx .corporate-ir.net/External.File?item=UGFyZW 50SUQ9MzY3MzYwfENoaWxkSUQ9LTF8VHlw ZT0z&t=1&cb=636229691488309586. Accessed September 29, 2017.
30. Iavazzo C, Papadopoulou EK, Gkegkes ID. Cost assessment of robotics in gynecologic surgery: A systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014; 40(11):2125-2134.
31. Coronado PJ, Fasero M, Magrina JF, Herraiz MA, Vidart JA. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy (TIPAL). J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(4):674-681.