Scientometrics

International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 322-327

  Leydesdorff, Loet ^a   Milojević, Staša ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Citation; Impact; Indicator; Library; Mapping; Research management; Science policy; Science studies; Scientometrics; Sociology of science; Visualization

Indexed keywords

EID: 85032607695     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.85030-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Bazerman C. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science 1988, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
2. Bornmann L., Leydesdorff L., Van den Besselaar P. A meta-evaluation of scientific research proposals: different ways of comparing rejected to awarded applications. Journal of Informetrics 2010, 4(3):211-220.
3. Bornmann L., de Moya-Anegón F., Leydesdorff L. The new excellence indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011. Journal of Informetrics 2012, 6(3):333-335.
4. Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology 1986, Macmillan, London. M. Callon, J. Law, A. Rip (Eds.).
5. Cole J.R., Cole S. Social Stratification in Science 1973, University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London.
6. Cozzens S.E. What do citations count? The rhetoric-first model. Scientometrics 1989, 15(5):437-447.
7. Cronin B. The Citation Process. The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication 1984, vol. 1. Taylor Graham, London.
8. Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy 1982, 11(3):147-162.
9. Dubois D.M. Computing anticipatory systems with incursion and hyperincursion. Computing Anticipatory Systems, CASYS-First International Conference 1998, vol. 437:3-29. American Institute of Physics, Woodbury, NY.
10. Edge D. Quantitative measures of communication in science: a critical overview. History of Science 1979, 17:102-134.
11. Egghe L. Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics 2006, 69(1):131-152.
12. Elkana Y., Lederberg J., Merton R.K., Thackray A., Zuckerman H. Toward a Metric of Science: The Advent of Science Indicators 1978, Wiley, New York, etc.
13. Fujigaki Y. Filling the gap between discussions on science and scientists' everyday activities: applying the autopoiesis system theory to scientific knowledge. Social Science Information 1998, 37(1):5-22.
14. Garfield E. Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities 1979, John Wiley, New York.
15. Gilbert G.N. Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science 1977, 7:113-122.
16. Gingras Y., Larivière V. There are neither "king" nor "crown" in scientometrics: comments on a supposed "alternative" method of normalization. Journal of Informetrics 2011, 5(1):226-227.
17. Hess D.J. Science Studies: An Advanced Introduction 1997, New York University Press, New York.
18. Hirsch J.E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005, 102(46):16569-16572.
19. Irvine J., Martin B.R. Foresight in Science: Picking the Winners 1984, Frances Pinter, London.
20. Latour B., Woolgar S. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts 1979, Sage, Beverly Hills, etc.
21. Leydesdorff L. The Challenge of Scientometrics: The Development, Measurement, and Self-organization of Scientific Communications 1995, DSWO Press, Leiden University, Leiden.
22. Leydesdorff L. Theories of citation?. Scientometrics 1998, 43(1):5-25.
23. Leydesdorff L., Bornmann L. Integrated Impact Indicators (I3) compared with Impact Factors (IFs): an alternative design with policy implications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2011, 62(11):2133-2146. 10.1002/asi.21609.
24. Leydesdorff, L., Ivanova, I.A., Mutual redundancies in inter-human communication systems: steps towards a calculus of processing meaning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, in press.
25. Leydesdorff L., Opthof T. Scopus' source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus the journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2010, 61(11):2365-2396.
26. Leydesdorff L., Van den Besselaar P. Scientometrics and communication theory: towards theoretically informed indicators. Scientometrics 1997, 38:155-174.
27. Leydesdorff L., Wouters P. Between texts and contexts: advances in theories of citation?. Scientometrics 1999, 44(2):169-182.
28. Merton R.K. Science and technology in a democratic order. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology 1942, 1:115-126.
29. Merton R.K. The Matthew effect in science. Science 1968, 159:56-63.
30. Merton R.K. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations 1973, University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London.
31. Milojević S., Leydesdorff L. Information metrics (iMetrics): a research specialty with a socio-cognitive identity?. Scientometrics 2013, 95(1):141-157.
32. Moed H.F. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics 2010, 4(3):265-277.
33. National Science Board Science and Engineering Indicators 2012, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/.
34. Newman M.E.J. Networks: An Introduction 2010, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York.
35. OECD The Measurement of Scientific and Technical Activities: "Frascati Manual" 1963/1976, OECD, Paris.
36. Popper, K.R., [1935]1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson, London.
37. Radicchi F., Fortunato S., Castellano C. Universality of citation distributions: toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2008, 105(45):17268-17272.
38. Rafols I., Leydesdorff L., O'Hare A., Nightingale P., Stirling A. How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: a comparison between innovation studies and business & management. Research Policy 2012, 41(7):1262-1282.
39. Rip A. Mapping of science: possibilities and limitations. Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology 1988, 253-273. Elsevier, North-Holland. A.F.J. Van Raan (Ed.).
40. Models of Science Dynamics: Encounters between Complexity Theory and Information Sciences 2012, Springer, Heidelberg, etc. A. Scharnhorst, K. Börner, P. van den Besselaar (Eds.).
41. Shin J.C., Toutkoushian R.K., Teichler U. University Rankings: Theoretical Basis, Methodology and Impacts on Global Higher Education 2011, Springer, Dordrecht.
42. de Solla Price D.J. Science since Babylon 1961, Yale University Press, New Haven.
43. de Solla Price D.J. Little Science, Big Science 1963, Columbia University Press, New York.
44. de Solla Price D.J. Networks of scientific papers. Science 1965, 149(3683):510-515.
45. de Solla Price D.J. A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1976, 27(5):292-306.
46. Wouters, P., 1999. The Citation Culture (unpublished Ph.D. thesis). University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
47. Wouters P., Leydesdorff L. Has Price's dream come true: is scientometrics a hard science?. Scientometrics 1994, 31:193-222.
48. Zhou P., Leydesdorff L. Fractional counting of citations in research evaluation: a cross- and interdisciplinary assessment of the Tsinghua University in Beijing. Journal of Informetrics 2011, 5(3):360-368.
49. Zuckerman H. Citation analysis and the complex problem of intellectual influence. Scientometrics 1987, 12(5):329-338.