Corporate environmental strategy: Extending the natural resource-based view of the firm

Academy of Management 2006 Annual Meeting: Knowledge, Action and the Public Concern, AOM 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Verbeke, Alain ^a   Bowen, Frances ^a   Sellers, Mona ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; INVESTMENTS; NATURAL RESOURCES;

COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTMENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGY; ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES; INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK; ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM;

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT;

EID: 85032487143     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2006.27176644     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Andersson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. 2000. Individual environmental initiative: Championing natural environmental issues in US business organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 548-570.
2. Aragon-Correa, J. A. 1998. Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5): 556-567.
3. Bansal, P. 2003. From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science, 14(5): 510-525.
4. Bansal, P. 2005. Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development, Strategic Management Journal, 26(3): 197-218.
5. Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120.
6. Branzei, O., Ursacki-Bryant, T. J., Vertinsky, I., & Zhang, W. 2004. The formation of green strategies in Chinese firms: matching corporate environmental responses and individual principles. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 1075-1095.
7. Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. 2003. Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 453-470.
8. Christmann, P. 2000. Effects of "best practices" of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 663-680.
9. Cordano, M., & Frieze, I. H. 2000. Pollution reduction preferences of US environmental managers: Applying Ajzen's theory of planned behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4): 627-642.
10. Egri, C., & Herman, S. 2000. Leadership in the North American environmental sector: Values, leadership styles and contexts of environmental leaders and their organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4): 571-604.
11. Hart, S. 1995. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4): 986-1014.
12. Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. 2002. Corporate boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigation. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 399-415.
13. Klassen, R., & Whybark, D. C. 1999. Environmental management in operations: The selection of environmental technologies. Decision Sciences, 30(3): 601-631.
14. Ramus, C. A., & Steger, U. 2000. The roles of supervisory support behaviors and environmental policy in employee ecoinitiatives at leading edge European companies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4): 605-626.
15. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3): 534-559.
16. Sharma, S. 2000. Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4): 681-697.
17. Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. 1998. Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 729-753.