Effective? Engaging? secure? applying the orcha-24 framework to evaluate apps for chronic insomnia disorder

Evidence-Based Mental Health

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2017, Pages

  Leigh, Simon ^a   Ouyang, Jing ^b   Mimnagh, Chris ^c  

^a Lifecode Solutions   (United Kingdom)

^b ALDER HEY CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c Elms Medical Centre   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFIDENTIALITY; DEVICES; HUMAN; INSOMNIA; MOBILE APPLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; STANDARDS; TELEMEDICINE;

CONFIDENTIALITY; HUMANS; MOBILE APPLICATIONS; QUALITY CONTROL; SLEEP INITIATION AND MAINTENANCE DISORDERS; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 85032275054     PISSN: 13620347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/eb-2017-102751     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Silva BM, Rodrigues JJ, de la Torre Díez I, et al. Mobile-health: a review of current state in 2015. J Biomed Inform 2015;56:265–72.
2. Price Waterhouse Coopers (PWC): socio-economic impact of mHealth: an assessment report for the European Union. 2013 https://www.gsma.com/iot/wp- content/uploads/2013/06/Socio-economic_impact-of-mHealth_EU_14062013V2.pdf (accessed 9 Mar 2017).
3. World Health Organisation World Health Report. Mental disorders affect one in four people. http://www.who.int/whr/2001/media_centre/press_release/en/(accessed 18 Apr 2017).
4. Leigh S, Flatt S. App-based psychological interventions: friend or foe? Evid Based Ment Health 2015;18:97–9.
5. Huckvale K, Prieto JT, Tilney M, et al. Unaddressed privacy risks in accredited health and wellness apps: a cross-sectional systematic assessment. BMC Med 2015;13:214.
6. Charter of fundamental rights of the European union (2000/c 364/01). article 8. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf (accessed 7 apr 2017).
7. Huckvale K, Adomaviciute S, Prieto JT, et al. Smartphone apps for calculating insulin dose: a systematic assessment. BMC Med 2015;13:106.
8. Wolf JA, Moreau JF, Akilov O, et al. Diagnostic inaccuracy of smartphone applications for melanoma detection. JAMA Dermatol 2013;149:422–6.
9. Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, et al. Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2015;3:e27.
10. Khoja S, Durrani H, Scott RE, et al. Conceptual framework for development of comprehensive e-health evaluation tool. Telemed J E Health 2013;19:48–53.
11. PAS 277:2015 health and wellness apps. Quality criteria across the life cycle. Code of practice. http://shop.bsigroup.com/forms/PASs/PAS-2772015/(accessed 4 Feb 2017).
12. App Quality Alliance. Baseline testing criteria for android applications. updated with v1.6,30 Nov 2014. http://www.appqualityalliance.org/AQuA-test-criteria-for-android- apps (accessed 5 Feb 2017).
13. The data protection act 1998. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/29/contents (accessed 4 Jun 2017).
14. The European Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:31995L0046 (accessed 5 May 2017).
15. Information Commissioner’s Office. Guidance on data security breach management. version 2.1. the data protection act. (2012). https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisations/documents/1562/guidance:on_data_security_breach_management.pdf (accessed 6 Apr 2017).
16. GSMA: Mobile and Privacy. Privacy design guidelines for mobile application development 2012. https://www.gsma.com/publicpolicy/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/gsmaprivacydesignguidelinesformobileapplicationdevelopmentv1.pdf (accessed 18 May 2017).
17. App Quality Alliance. Accessibility testing criteria for windows applications version 1.0 October 2015. http://www.appqualityalliance.org/Accessibility_Testing_Criteria (accessed 7 Feb 2017).
18. W3C. Accessibility requirements for people with low vision editor's draft 06 Jun 2016, clause 3.3.1. https://www.w3.org/TR/low-vision-needs/(accessed 5 Apr 2017).
19. NHS. Online Mental Health Services: Sleepio. http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/online- mental-health-services/Pages/sleepio.aspx (accessed 21 May 2017).
20. Misrepresentation act 1967. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1967/7/section/3 (accessed 18 Apr 2017).
21. Leigh S. Comparing applets and oranges: barriers to evidence-based practice for app-based psychological interventions. Evid Based Ment Health 2016;19:90–2.
22. Zimmeck S, Wang Z, Zou L, et al. Automated analysis of privacy requirements for mobile apps. 2016 http://shomir.net/pdf/publications/plt_2016s.pdf (accessed 23 Apr 2017).
23. Blenner SR, Köllmer M, Rouse AJ, et al. Privacy policies of android diabetes apps and sharing of health information. JAMA 2016;315:1051–2.
24. EU Commission. EU charter of fundamental rights (2009). http://ec.europa.eu/justice/fundamental-rights/charter/index_en.htm (accessed 11 Feb 2017).
25. Olmstead K, Atkinson M. Pew Research Center: Internet & Technology. Apps permissions in the google play store. 2015 http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/11/10/apps-permissions-in-the-google-play-store/(accessed 28 May 2017).
26. Khalid H. On the link between mobile app quality and user reviews. M.Sc Thesis. 2014 https://qspace.library.queensu.ca/bitstream/handle/1974/12596/Khalid_H ammad_201410_MSC.pdf;jsessionid=25F5D563137E7802DBF77A2F0AB3F84E? sequence=1 (accessed 28 May 2017).
27. Apps Information for Developers about the Apps Library (Beta). NHS digital assessment questions – Beta. frequently asked questions. https://developer.nhs.uk/digital-tools/frequently-asked-questions/(accessed 8 Sep 2017).
28. NHS apps. https://apps.beta.nhs.uk (accessed 2 May 2017).
29. IMS institute for health informatics. Medicines use and spending in the US—a review of 2015 and outlook to 2020. http://www.imshealth.com/en/thought-leadership/ims-institute (accessed 2 Apr 2016).
30. AQuA. Best practice guidelines for producing high quality mobile applications version 2.3. http://www.appqualityalliance.org/AQuA-best-practice-guidelines (accessed 5 May 2017).