Conceptual framework for development of comprehensive e-health evaluation tool

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 48-53

  Khoja, Shariq ^a   Durrani, Hammad ^a   Scott, Richard E ^b   Sajwani, Afroz ^a   Piryani, Usha ^a  

^a AGA KHAN UNIVERSITY   (Pakistan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

e health; Evaluation; Framework; Outcomes; Theories

Indexed keywords

LIFE CYCLE; NETWORK FUNCTION VIRTUALIZATION;

E HEALTH; EVALUATION; FRAMEWORK; OUTCOMES; THEORIES;

HEALTH;

CONCEPT FORMATION; PAKISTAN; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; TELEMEDICINE;

CONCEPT FORMATION; PAKISTAN; PROGRAM EVALUATION; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 84891448228     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: 15563669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0073     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ovretveit J. Medical managers can make research-based management decisions. J Manag Med 1998;12:322, 391-397
2. World Health Organization. Global Observatory for e-Health. 2005. Available at www.who.int/kms/initiatives/e-Health/en/ (last accessed January 30, 2012
3. Scott RE, Mars M, Hebert M. How global is 'e-health' and 'knowledge translation.' In: Ho K, Selinger SJ, Lauscher HN, Cordeiro J, Scott RE, eds. Technology enabled knowledge translation. New York: Springer, 2012:339-357
4. McIntosh E, Cairns J. A framework for the economic evaluation of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 1997;3:132-139 (Pubitemid 127711250)
5. Bashshur R, Shannon G, Sapci H. Telemedicine evaluation. Telemed J E Health 2005;11:296-316 (Pubitemid 41077370)
6. Scott RE. 'Pragmatic evaluation': A conceptual framework for designing a systematic approach to evaluation of e-health interventions. Int J E-Health Med Commun 2010;1(2):1-11. DOI: 10.4018/IJEHMC.2010040101
7. Gustafson DH, Wyatt JC. Evaluation of e-health systems and services. BMJ 2004;328:1150
8. Catwell L, Sheikh A. Evaluating e-health interventions: The need for continuous systemic evaluation. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000126
9. Bates DW, Wright A. Evaluating e-health: Undertaking robust international cross-cultural e-health research. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000105
10. PANACeA: PanAsian Collaboration for Evidence-based e-Health Adoption and Application. Available at www.panacea-e-Health.net (last accessed January 13, 2011
11. Shadish WR. Need-based evaluation theory: What do you need to know to do good evaluation? Am J Eval 1994;15:347-358
12. Prochaska JM, Prochaska JO, Levesque DA. A transtheoretical approach to changing organizations. Adm Policy Ment Health 2001;28:247-261 (Pubitemid 32830282)
13. Hepworth J. Evaluation in health outcomes research: Linking theories, methodologies and practice in health promotion. Health Promot Int 1997;12:233-238 (Pubitemid 27423188)
14. Coyte PC, Holmes D. Healthcare technology adoption and diffusion in a social context. Policy Polit Nurs Pract 2007;8:47-54
15. Coiera E. Putting the technical back into socio-technical systems research. Int J Med Inform 2007;76(Suppl 1):S98-S103
16. Slothuus U. Economic evaluation: Theory, methods & application. Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, 2000
17. McIntyre LJ. Doing the right thing: Ethics in social research. In: The Practical Skeptic: Readings in Sociology. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2002:43-52
18. Scott RE, Chowdhury MF, Varghese S. Telehealth policy: Looking for global complementarity. J Telemed Telecare 2002;8(Suppl 3(6)):55-57
19. Herbst K, Littlejohns P, Rawlinson J, Collinson M, Wyatt JC. Evaluating computerized health information systems: Hardware, software and human ware: Experiences from the Northern Province, South Africa. J Public Health Med 1999;21:305-310 (Pubitemid 29446070)
20. Jayasuriya R. Managing information systems for health services in a developing country: A case study using a contexualist framework. Int J Inform Manag 1999;19:335-349 (Pubitemid 32080325)
21. Kaufman D, Roberts WD, Merrill J, Lai TY, Bakken S. Applying an evaluation framework for health information system design, development, and implementation. Nurs Res 2006;55(2 Suppl):S37-S42 (Pubitemid 44620335)
22. Vanclay F. International principles for social impact assessment: Their evolution. Impact Assess Project Apprais 2003;21:3-4
23. INAHTA health technology assessment (HTA) glossary. Available at www.inahta.org/GO-DIRECT-TO/Members/ (last accessed January 21, 2012
24. Khoja S, Scott R, Gilani S. E-health readiness assessment: Promoting ''hope'' in the health-care institutions of Pakistan. World Hosp Health Serv 2008;44:36-38