Single nucleus sequencing reveals spermatid chromosome fragmentation as a possible cause of maize haploid induction

Nature Communications

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Li, Xiang ^a   Meng, Dexuan ^b   Chen, Shaojiang ^b   Luo, Haishan ^b   Zhang, Qinghua ^a   Jin, Weiwei ^b   Yan, Jianbing ^a  

^a HUAZHONG AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME; CONSPECIFIC; EMBRYO; GAMETOPHYTE; GENE EXPRESSION; MAIZE; PLOIDY; POLLEN;

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; CELL ISOLATION; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; ENDOSPERM; GAMETOPHYTE; HAPLOIDY; MAIZE; MEIOSIS; MICROSPORE; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; POLLEN; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SPERMATID; WHOLE GENOME SEQUENCING; DNA FRAGMENTATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; PLANT CHROMOSOME; PLANT SEED; PROCEDURES;

ZEA MAYS;

PLANT DNA;

ANEUPLOIDY; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; DNA FRAGMENTATION; DNA, PLANT; ENDOSPERM; HAPLOIDY; MEIOSIS; POLLEN; SEEDS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 85032220628     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00969-8     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Geiger, H. H. in Handbook of Maize Genetics And Genomics (eds Bennetzen, J. L. & Hoke, S.) 641-657 (Springer, 2009).
2. Forster, B. P., Heberle-Bors, E., Kasha, K. J. & Touraev, A. The resurgence of haploids in higher plants. Trends Plant Sci. 12, 368-375 (2007).
3. Evans, M. M. The indeterminate gametophyte1 gene of maize encodes a LOB domain protein required for embryo Sac and leaf development. Plant Cell 19, 46-62 (2007).
4. Kermicle, J. L. Androgenesis conditioned by a mutation in maize. Science 166, 1422-1424 (1969).
5. Coe, E. H. A line of maize with high haploid frequency. Am. Nat. 93, 381-382 (1959).
6. Sarkar, K. R. & Coe, E. H. A genetic analysis of the origin of maternal haploids in maize. Genetics 54, 453-464 (1966).
7. Prigge, V. & Melchinger, A. E. Production of haploids and doubled haploids in maize. Methods Mol. Biol. 877, 161-172 (2012).
8. Xu, X. et al. Gametophytic and zygotic selection leads to segregation distortion through in vivo induction of a maternal haploid in maize. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 1083-1096 (2013).
9. Sarkar, K. R., Panke, S. & Sachan, J. Development of maternalhaploidy inducer lines in maize. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 42, 781-786 (1972).
10. Dong, X. et al. Fine mapping of qhir1 influencing in vivo haploid induction in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 126, 1713-1720 (2013).
11. Lashermes, P. & Beckert, M. Genetic control of maternal haploidy in maize (Zea mays L.) and selection of haploid inducing lines. Theor. Appl. Genet. 76, 405-410 (1988).
12. Prigge, V. et al. New insights into the genetics of in vivo induction of maternal haploids, the backbone of doubled haploid technology in maize. Genetics 190, 781-793 (2012).
13. Barret, P., Brinkmann, M. & Beckert, M. A major locus expressed in the male gametophyte with incomplete penetrance is responsible for in situ gynogenesis in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 117, 581-594 (2008).
14. Bennett, M. D., Finch, R. A. & Barclay, I. R. The time rate and mechanism of chromosome elimination in Hordeum hybrids. Chromosoma 54, 175-200 (1976).
15. Kasha, K. J. & Kao, K. N. High frequency haploid production in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Nature 225, 874-876 (1970).
16. Li, L., Xu, X., Jin, W. & Chen, S. Morphological and molecular evidences for DNA introgression in haploid induction via a high oil inducer CAUHOI in maize. Planta 230, 367-376 (2009).
17. Sanei, M., Pickering, R., Kumke, K., Nasuda, S. & Houben, A. Loss of centromeric histone H3 (CENH3) from centromeres precedes uniparental chromosome elimination in interspecific barley hybrids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, E498-505 (2011).
18. Zhang, Z. et al. Chromosome-elimination and in vivo haploid induction by stock6 derived inducer line in maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Cell Rep. 27, 1851-1860 (2008).
19. Zhao, X., Xu, X., Xie, H., Chen, S. & Jin, W. Fertilization and uniparental chromosome elimination during crosses with maize haploid inducers. Plant Physiol. 163, 721-731 (2013).
20. Shapiro, E., Biezuner, T. & Linnarsson, S. Single-cell sequencing-based technologies will revolutionize whole-organism science. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 618-630 (2013).
21. Li, X., Li, L. & Yan, J. Dissecting meiotic recombination based on tetrad analysis by single-microspore sequencing in maize. Nat. Commun. 6, 6648 (2015).
22. Snape, J. W. et al. The use of irradiated pollen for differential gene transfer in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Theor. Appl. Genet. 65, 103-111 (1983).
23. Jones, G. H. Gene transfer in, nicotiana rustica by means of irradiated pollen II cytogenetical consequences. Heredity 52, 113-119 (1984).
24. Hayter, A. M. Cytological observation on the effects of pollen irradiation in diploid and polyploid crops. Heredity 54, 165-170 (1985).
25. Ravi, M. & Chan, S. W. Haploid plants produced by centromere-mediated genome elimination. Nature 464, 615-618 (2010).
26. Kelliher, T. et al. MATRILINEAL, a sperm-specific phospholipase, triggers maize haploid induction. Nature 542, 105-109 (2017).
27. Liu, C. et al. A 4bp insertion at ZmPLA1 encoding a putative phospholipase A generates haploid induction in maize. Mol. Plant 10, 520-522 (2017).
28. Gilles, L. M. et al. Loss of pollen-specific phospholipase NOT LIKE DAD triggers gynogenesis in maize. EMBO J. 36, 707-717 (2017).
29. McConn, M. & Browse, J. The critical requirement for linolenic scid is pollen development, not photosynthesis, in an Arabidopsis mutant. Plant Cell 8, 403-416 (1996).
30. Dong, X. et al. Marker-assisted selection and evaluation of high oil in vivo haploid inducers in maize. Mol. Breed. 34, 1147 (2014).
31. Duncan, D. R., Williams, M. E., Zehr, B. E. & Widholm, J. M. The production of callus capable of plant regeneration from immature embryos of numerous Zea mays genotypes. Planta 165, 322-332 (1985).
32. Li, S. et al. Natural variation in PTB1 regulates rice seed setting rate by controlling pollen tube growth. Nat. Commun. 4, 2793 (2013).
33. Kato, A., Lamb, J. C. & Birchler, J. A. Chromosome painting using repetitive DNA sequences as probes for somatic chromosome identification in maize. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 13554-13559 (2004).
34. Page, B. T., Wanous, M. K. & Birchler, J. A. Characterization of a maize chromosome 4 centromeric sequence: evidence for an evolutionary relationship with the B chromosome centromere. Genetics 159, 291-302 (2001).
35. Zhao, X. et al. Comparison of the distribution of the repetitive DNA sequences in three variants of Cucumis sativus reveals their phylogenetic relationships. J. Genet. Genomics 38, 39-45 (2011).
36. Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114-2120 (2014).
37. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754-1760 (2009).
38. Ding, L. et al. Genome remodelling in a basal-like breast cancer metastasis and xenograft. Nature 464, 999-1005 (2010).
39. Liu, W. et al. Copy number analysis indicates monoclonal origin of lethal metastatic prostate cancer. Nat. Med. 15, 559-565 (2009).
40. Prelić, A. et al. A systematic comparison and evaluation of biclustering methods for gene expression data. Bioinformatics 22, 1122-1129 (2006).
41. Yachida, S. et al. Distant metastasis occurs late during the genetic evolution of pancreatic cancer. Nature 467, 1114-1117 (2010).
42. Knouse, K. A., Wu, J., Whittaker, C. A. & Amon, A. Single cell sequencing reveals low levels of aneuploidy across mammalian tissues. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 13409-13414 (2014).
43. Navin, N. et al. Tumour evolution inferred by single-cell sequencing. Nature 472, 90-94 (2011).