Monitoring the brazilian pasturelands: A new mapping approach based on the landsat 8 spectral and temporal domains

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

Volumn 62, Issue , 2017, Pages 135-143

  Parente, Leandro ^a   Ferreira, Laerte ^a   Faria, Adriano ^a   Nogueira, Sérgio ^a   Araújo, Fernando ^a   Teixeira, Lana ^a   Hagen, Stephen ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF GOIÁS   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Data availability; Land cover; Landsat; Mapping; Pasturelands; Random forest

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; LAND COVER; LANDSAT; MAPPING METHOD; PASTURE; SPECTRAL ANALYSIS; TEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

BRAZIL;

EID: 85032212142     PISSN: 15698432     EISSN: 1872826X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2017.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Araújo, F.M., Faria, A.S., Ferreira, L.G., Nogueira, S.H.M., Distribuição e avaliação da acuidade espacial dos mapeamentos da área de pastagem para o Brasil. 2017, XVIII Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto, Santos Anais.
2. Breiman, L., Random forests. Mach. Learning 45:1 (2001), 5–32.
3. Bustamante, M.M., Nobre, C.A., Smeraldi, R., Aguiar, A.P., Barioni, L.G., Ferreira, L.G., Longo, K., May, P., Pinto, A., Ometto, J.P., Estimating greenhouse gas emissions from cattle raising in Brazil. Clim. Change 115:3 (2012), 559–577.
4. CNA, Brasil pode se tornar o maior produtor de carne bovina do mundo. 2016 (Disponível em . Acesso em Julho de 2016).
5. Coutinho, A.C., Almeida, C., Venturieri, A., Esquerdo, J.C.D.M., Silva, M., Uso e cobertura da terra nas áreas desflorestadas da Amazônia Legal: TerraClass 2008. 2013, EMBRAPA, Brasília.
6. Dias, L.C., Pimenta, F.M., Santos, A.B., Costa, M.H., Ladle, R.J., Patterns of land use, extensification, and intensification of Brazilian agriculture. Global Change Biol. 22:8 (2016), 2887–2903.
7. FAO, Statistics Yearbook 2013 − World Food and Agriculture. 2013, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
8. Gao, B.C., NDWI – A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sens. Environ. 58:3 (1996), 257–266.
9. Google Earth ENGINE. Intro Disponível em: < https://earthengine.google.org/#intro>. (Acesso em: 10. March 2017).
10. Hansen, M.C., Potapov, P.V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S.A., Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S.V., Goetz, S.J., Loveland, T.R., Kommareddy, A., Egorov, A., Chini, L., Justice, C.O., Townshend, J.R.G., High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342:6160 (2013), 850–853.
11. Herrero, M., Henderson, B., Havlík, P., Thornton, P.K., Conant, R.T., Smith, P., Wirsenius, S., Hristov, A.N., Gerber, P., Gil, M., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Valin, H., Garnett, T., Stehfest, E., Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector. Nat. Clim. Change 6 (2016), 452–461.
12. Huete, A.R., Liu, H.Q., Batchily, K., Van Leeuwen, W.J.D., A comparison of vegetation indices over a global set of TM images for EOS-MODIS. Remote Sens. Environ. 59 (1997), 440–451.
13. IBGE, Censo Agropecuário. 2006, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Rio de Janeiro.
14. IBGE, Pesquisa Pecuária Municipal Disponível. 2017 (em: . Acesso em: 10. Jan. 2017).
15. Irons, J.R., Dwyer, J.L., Barsi, J.A., The next Landsat satellite: the Landsat data continuity mission. Remote Sens. Environ. 122 (2012), 11–21.
16. Ishwaran, H., The effect of splitting on random forests. Machine Learning 99:1 (2015), 75–118.
17. Lambin, E.F., Gibbs, H.K., Ferreira, L.G., Grau, R., Mayaux, P., Meyfroidt, P., Morton, D.C., Rudel, T.K., Gasparri, I., Munger, J., Estimating the world's potentially available cropland using a bottom-up approach. Global Environ. Change 23:5 (2013), 892–901.
18. Lapola, D.M., Martinelli, L.A., Peres, C.A., Ometto, J.P.H.B., Ferreira, M.E., Nobre, C.A., Aguiar, A.P.D., Bustamante, M.M.C., Cardoso, M.F., Costa, M.H., Joly, C.A., Leite, C.C., Moutinho, P., Sampaio, G., Strassburg, B.B.N., Vieira, I.C.G., Pervasive transition of the Brazilian land-use system. Nat. Clim. Change 4 (2013), 27–35.
19. Lohr, S.L., Sampling: Design and Analysis. second edition, 2009, Cengage Learning, Boston.
20. MMA, Projeto de conservação e utilização sustentável da diversidade biológica brasileira: relatório de atividades. 2002, Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília.
21. MMA, Mapeamento do Uso e Cobertura da Terra do Cerrado: Projeto TerraClass Cerrado 2013. 2015, Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília.
22. Nagler, P.L., Inoue, Y., Glenn, E.P., Russ, A.L., Daughtry, C.S.T., Cellulose absorption index (CAI) to quantify mixed soil?plant litter scenes. Remote Sens. Environ. 87:2 (2003), 310–325.
23. Pontius, R.G., Millones, M., Death to Kappa: birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment. Int. J. Remote Sens. 32:15 (2011), 4407–4429.
24. Roy, D.P., Zhang, H.K., JU, J., Gomez-Dans, J.L., Lewis, P.E., Schaaf, C.B., Sun, Q., LI, J., Huang, H., Kovalskyy, V., A general method to normalize Landsat reflectance data to nadir BRDF adjusted reflectance. Remote Sens. Environ. 176 (2016), 255–271.
25. USDA, USDA Agricultural Projectionsto 2025. 2016, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington.
26. Zhu, Z., Wang, S., Woodcock, C.E., Improvement and expansion of the Fmask algorithm: cloud, cloud shadow, and snow detection for Landsats 4–7, 8, and Sentinel 2 images. Remote Sens. Environ. 159 (2015), 269–277.