Pervasive transition of the Brazilian land-use system

Nature Climate Change

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 27-35

  Lapola, David M ^a   Martinelli, Luiz A ^b   Peres, Carlos A ^c   Ometto, Jean P H B ^d   Ferreira, Manuel E ^e   Nobre, Carlos A ^d   Aguiar, Ana Paula D ^d   Bustamante, Mercedes M C ^f   Cardoso, Manoel F ^d   Costa, Marcos H ^g   Joly, Carlos A ^h   Leite, Christiane C ^g   Moutinho, Paulo ⁱ   Sampaio, Gilvan ^d   Strassburg, Bernardo B N ^j,k   Vieira, Ima C G ^l  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^d INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS   (Brazil)

^e FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF GOIÁS   (Brazil)

^f UNIVERSITY OF BRASILIA   (Brazil)

^g FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF VIÇOSA   (Brazil)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

ⁱ INSTITUTO DE PESQUISA AMBIENTAL DA AMAZÔNIA   (Brazil)

^j INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABILITY   (Brazil)

^k PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^l MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI   (Brazil)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATION; AGRICULTURAL LAND; AGRICULTURAL PRACTICE; AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; AGROFORESTRY; CLIMATE CHANGE; DEFORESTATION; EMISSION; GREENHOUSE GAS; LAND TENURE; LAND USE CHANGE; POLICY MAKING; URBAN AREA;

BRAZIL;

EID: 84890903827     PISSN: 1758678X     EISSN: 17586798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2056     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. FAOSTAT (FAO, accessed 20 June 2012); http://go.nature.com/E6UaXd
2. Gridded Livestock of the World 2007 (FAO, 2007).
3. Second National Communication of Brazil to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (Ministério de Ciência e Tecnologia, 2010).
4. Brasil Projeções do Agronegócio 2010-2011 a 2020-2021 (Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento, 2011).
5. Plano Decenal de Expansão de Energia 20011/2020 (Empresa de Pesquisa Energética, 2011).
6. Bowman, M. S. et al. Persistence of cattle ranching in the Brazilian Amazon: A spatial analysis of the rationale for beef production. Land Use Policy 29, 558-568 (2012).
7. Killeen, T. J. A Perfect Storm in the Amazon Wilderness, Development and Conservation in the Context of the Initiative for Integration of the Regional Infrastructure of South America (IIRSA) (Conservation International, 2007).
8. Alexandratos, N. & Bruinsma, J. World Agriculture Towards 2030/2050: The 2012 Revision ESA Working Paper No. 12-03 (FAO, 2012).
9. Geist, H. J. & Lambin, E. F. Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. BioScience 52, 134-150 (2002).
10. Nepstad, D. C., Stickler, C. M. & Almeida, O. T. Globalization of the Amazon soy and beef industries: Opportunities for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 20, 1595-1603 (2006).
11. Gibbs, H. K. et al. Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16732-16737 (2010).
12. Macedo, M. N. et al. Decoupling of deforestation and soy production in the southern Amazon during the late 2000s. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 1341-1346 (2012).
13. Angelsen, A. Policies for reduced deforestation and their impact on agricultural production. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19639-19644 (2010).
14. Ferreira, N. C., Ferreira, L. G. Jr, Huete, A. R. & Ferreira, M. E. An operational deforestation mapping system using MODIS data and spatial context analysis. Int. J. Remote Sens. 28, 47-62 (2007).
15. Satellite Monitoring of Deforestation in Brazilian Biomes Program (IBAMA, accessed 25 February 2012); http://siscom.ibama.gov.br/monitorabiomas
16. Valor Bruto da Produção: 2003-2012 (MAPA, 2012).
17. Censo Agropecuário 2006 - Primeiros Resultados: Agricultura Familiar Brasil, Grandes Regiões e Unidades da Federação (IBGE, 2009).
18. Municipal Agricultural Production and Population Census (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, 2012); http://go.nature.com/vdm5lC
19. Martinelli, L. A. & Filoso, S. Expansion of sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil: Environmental and social challenges. Ecol. Appl. 18, 885-898 (2008).
20. Exportação por Ano (ABIEC, accessed 9 September 2013); http://go.nature.com/nWyozz
21. Barretto, A. G. O. P., Berndes, G., Sparovek, G. & Wirsenius, S. Agricultural intensification in Brazil and its effects on land-use patterns: An analysis of the 1975-2006 period. Glob. Change Biol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ gcb.12174 (2013).
22. Martinelli, L. A., Naylor, R., Vitousek, P. M. & Moutinho, P. Agriculture in Brazil: Impacts, costs, and opportunities for a sustainable future. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2, 431-438 (2010).
23. Regulamenta os Arts. 6, 11 e 12 da Lei no 12.187, de 29 de Dezembro de 2009, que Institui a Política Nacional sobre Mudança do Clima: PNMC, e dá Outras Providências Federal Decree 7.390/2010 (Government of Brazil, 2010).
24. Cohn, A., Bowman, M., Zilberman, D. & O'Neill, K. The Viability of Cattle Ranching Intensification in Brazil as a Strategy to Spare Land and Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions (CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security, 2011).
25. Kaimowitz, D., Angelsen, A. Will livestock intensification help save Latin America's tropical forest? J. Sustain. For. 27, 6-24 (2008).
26. Rudel, T. K. et al. Agricultural intensification and changes in cultivated areas, 1970-2005 Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 20675-20680 (2009).
27. Balmford, A., Green, R. E., Scharlemann, J. P. W. Sparing land for nature: Exploring the potential impact of changes in agricultural yield on the area needed for crop production. Glob. Change Biol. 11, 1594-1605 (2005).
28. Lambin, E. F. & Meyfroidt, P. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3465-3472 (2011).
29. Nepstad, D. et al. The end of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 326, 1350-1351 (2009).
30. Rudorff, B. F. T. et al. The soy moratorium in the Amazon biome monitored by remote sensing images. Remote Sens. 3, 185-202 (2011).
31. Walker, R. et al. Protecting the Amazonia with protected areas. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 10582-10586 (2009).
32. Assunção, J. A., Gandour, C. C. & Rocha, R. Deforestation Slowdown in the Legal Amazon: Prices or Policies? (Climate Policy Initiative, 2012).
33. Walker, R. The scale of forest transition: Amazonia and the Atlantic forests of Brazi. Appl. Geogr. 32, 12-20 (2012).
34. Directive 2009/28/CE of the European Parliament and Council, of 23 April 2009, on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources and Amending and Subsequently Repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC (EU, 2009).
35. Wolford, W. Participatory democracy by default: Land reform, social movements and the state in Brazil. J. Peasant Stud. 37, 91-109 (2010).
36. Costa, S. H. G. A Questão Agrária no Brasil e a Bancada Ruralista no Congresso Nacional Masters dissertation, Univ. de São Paulo (2012).
37. Ramos, S. Y & Martha-Júnior, G. B. Evolução da Política de Crédito Rural Brasileira (Embrapa, 2010).
38. Abbey, L. A., Baer, B. & Filizzola, M. Growth efficiency, and equity: The impact of agribusiness and land reform in Brazil. Lat. Am. Bus. Rev. 7, 93-115 (2006).
39. Ferreira, F. G. H., Leite, P. G. & Litchfield, J. A. The Rise and Fall of Brazilian Inequality: 1981-2004 Policy Research Working Paper 3867 (World Bank, 2006).
40. VanWey, L. K., Spera S., de Sa, R., Mahr, D. & Mustard, J. F. Socioeconomic development and agricultural intensification in Mato Grosso. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 368, 20120168 (2013).
41. Martinelli, L. A., Joly, C. A., Nobre, C. A. & Sparovek, G. The false dichotomy between preservation of the natural vegetation and food production in Brazil. Biota Neotrop. 10, 323-330 (2010).
42. Índice de Desenvolvimento Humano Municipal Brasileiro (PNUD, 2013).
43. Perz, S. G. The rural exodus in the context of economic crisis, globalization and reform in Brazil. Int. Migr. Rev. 131, 842-881 (2000).
44. Aguiar, D. A., Rudorff, B. F. T., Silva, W. F., Adami, M. & Mello, M. P. Remote sensing images in support of environmental protocol: monitoring the sugarcane harvest in São Paulo state, Brazil. Remote Sens. 3, 2682-2703 (2011).
45. Lambin, E. F. et al. Estimating the world's potentially available cropland using a bottom-up approach. Glob. Environ. Change http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.005 (2013).
46. Mata, D., Deichmann, U., Henderson, J. V., Lall, S. V. & Wang H. G. Determinants of City Growth in Brazil (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2005).
47. DeFries, R. S., Rudel, T., Uriarte, M. & Hansen, M. Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in twenty-first century. Nature Geosci. 3, 178-181 (2010).
48. Hotez, P. J. Forgotten Diseases, Forgotten People: The Neglected Tropical Diseases and Their Impact on Global Health and Development (ASM, 2008).
49. Torres, R. R., Lapola, D. M., Marengo, J. A. & Lombardo, M. A. Socio-climatic hotspots in Brazil. Climatic Change 115, 597-609 (2012).
50. Marengo, J. A. et al.The drought of Amazonia in 2005. J. Clim. 21, 495-516 (2008).
51. Morton, J. F. The impact of climate change on smallholder and subsistence agriculture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 19680-19685 (2007).
52. Brondizio, E. S. & Moran, E. F. Human dimensions of climate change: The vulnerability of small farmers in the Amazon. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 363, 1803-1809 (2008).
53. Lapola, D. M. et al. Impacts of climate change and the end of deforestation on land use in the Brazilian Legal Amazon. Earth Interact. 15, 1-29 (2011).
54. Lobell, D. B. et al. Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science 319, 607-610 (2008).
55. Assad, E. & Pinto, H. S. (eds) Aquecimento Global e a Nova Geografia da Produção Agrícola no Brasil (EMRAPA and UNICAMP, 2008).
56. Margulis, S., Dubeux, C. B. S. & Marcovitch, J. (Technical coordinators) The Economics of Climate Change in Brazil: Costs and Opportunities (FEA/USP, 2011).
57. Oliveira, L. J. C., Costa, M. H., Soares-Filho, B. S. & Coe, M. Large-scale expansion of agriculture in Amazonia may be a no-win scenario. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 024021 (2013).
58. Lobell, D. B. & Field, C. B. Estimation of the carbon dioxide (CO2) fertilization effect using growth rate anomalies of CO2 and crop yields since 1961. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 39-45 (2008).
59. Torres, R. R. & Marengo, J. A. Uncertainty assessments of climate projections over South America. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 112, 253-272 (2013).
60. Nobre, C. A., Sellers, P. & Shukla, J. Amazonian deforestation and regional climate change. J. Climate 4, 957-988 (1991).
61. Negri, A. J., Adler, R. F., Xu, L. & Surratt, J. The impact of Amazonian deforestation on dry season rainfall. J. Clim. 17, 1306-1319 (2004).
62. Malhado, A. C. M., Pires, G. F. & Costa, M. H. Cerrado conservation is essential to protect the Amazon rainforest. Ambio 39, 580-584 (2010).
63. Loarie, S. R., Lobell, D. B., Asner, G. P., Mu, Q. & Field, C. B. Direct impacts on local climate of sugar-cane expansion in Brazil. Nature Clim. Change 1, 105-109 (2011).
64. Georgescu, M., Lobell, D. B., Field, C. B. & Mahalov, A. Simulated hydroclimatic impacts of projected Brazilian sugarcane expansion. Geophys. Res. Lett. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012GL054612 (2013).
65. Costa, M. H., Yanagi, S. N. M., Souza, P. J. O. P., Ribeiro, A. & Rocha, E. J. P. Climate change in Amazonia caused by soybean cropland expansion, as compared to caused by pastureland expansion. Geophys. Res. Lett.34, L07706 (2007).
66. Sampaio, G. et al. Regional climate change over eastern Amazonia caused by pasture and soybean cropland expansion. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34. L17709 (2007).
67. Costa, M. H. & Foley, J. A. Combined effects of deforestation and doubled atmospheric CO2 concentrations on the climate of Amazonia. J. Clim. 13, 18-34 (2000).
68. Souza, D. C. & Oyama, M. D. Climatic consequences of gradual desertification in the semi-arid area of Northeast Brazil. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 103, 345-357 (2011).
69. Monitoring of Vegetation Fires (INPE, accessed 6 December 2013); http://go.nature.com/pFbvTz
70. Lara, L. L. et al. Properties of aerosols from sugar cane burning emissions in Southern Brazil. Atmos. Environ. 39, 4627-4637 (2005).
71. Rosenfeld, D. et al. Flood or drought: How do aerosols affect precipitation? Science 321, 1309-1313 (2008).
72. Neill, C. et al. Watershed responses to Amazon soya bean cropland expansion and intensification. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 368, 20120425 (2013).
73. Le Quéré, C. et al. Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Nature Geosci. 2, 831-836 (2009).
74. Aguiar, A. P. D. et al. Modeling the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of deforestation-driven carbon emissions: the INPE-EM framework applied to the Brazilian Amazon. Global Change Biol. 18, 3346-3366 (2012).
75. Araújo, F. M., Ferreira, L. G. & Arantes, A. E. Distribution patterns of burned areas in the Brazilian biomes: an analysis based on satellite data for the 2002-2010 period. Remote Sens. 4, 1929-1946 (2012).
76. Estimativas Anuais de Emissões de Gases de Efeito Estufa no Brasil (MCTI, 2013).
77. Bustamante, M. M. C. et al. Estimating greenhouse gas emissions fom cattle raising in Brasil. Climatic Change 115, 559-577 (2012).
78. Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J. & Befort, B. L. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20260-20264 (2011).
79. Godfray, H. C. J. et al. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327, 812-818 (2010).
80. Bungestab, D. M. (ed.) Sistemas de Integração Lavoura-pecuária-floresta: A Produção Sustentável (Embrapa, 2012).
81. Sparovek, G. et al. Brazilian agriculture and environmental legislation: Status and future challenges. Environ. Sci. Technol. 4, 6046-6053 (2010).
82. Angelo, C. Brazil's fund for low-carbon agriculture lies fallow. Nature News http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature.2012.11111 (2012).
83. Galford, G. L., Soares-Filho, B. & Cerri, C. E. P. Opinion piece: Prospects for land-use sustainability on the agricultural frontier of the Brazilian Amazon. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 368, 20120171 (2013).
84. Wunder, S. 2007. The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conserv. Biol. 21, 48-58 (2007).
85. Moutinho, P. et al. The emerging REDD+ regime of Brazil. Carbon Manage. 2, 587-602 (2011).
86. Acemoglu, D. & Robinson, J. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty (Crown Business, 2012).
87. Sen, K. The political dynamics of economic growth. World Dev. 47, 71-86 (2013).
88. Monfreda, C., Ramankutty, N. & Foley, J. A. Farming the planet: 2. Geographic distribution of crop areas, yields, physiological types, and NPP in the year 2000. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 22, GB1022 (2008).
89. Atlas of the Atlantic Forest Remnants: 2010-2011 Period (SOS Mata Atlântica & INPE, 2012).
90. PRODES (INPE, accessed 20 February 2012); http://www.obt.inpe.br/prodes
91. Indicadores do Desenvolvimento Sustentável - Brasil 2012 (IBGE, 2012).
92. TerraClass Land-use Database (INPE, accessed 10 September 2013); http://go.nature.com/fIAFXg
93. Defense Meteorological Satellite Program 2013 (Department of Defense, accessed 10 September 2013); http://go.nature.com/u7b6Os
94. Margulis, S. Causas do Desmatamento na Amazônia Brasileira (The World Bank, 2003).
95. Walter, A. et al. Sustainability assessment of bio-ethanol production in Brazil considering land use change, GHG emissions and socio-economic aspects. Energy Policy 39, 5703-5716 (2011).
96. Lapola, D. M. et al. Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 3388-3393 (2010).
97. Arima, E. Y., Richards, P., Walker, R. & Caldas, M. M. Statistical confirmation of indirect land use change in the Brazilian Amazon. Environ. Res. Lett. 6, 024010 (2011).
98. Sampaio, E. et al. Tree biomass estimation in regenerating areas of tropical dry vegetation in northeast Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management 259, 1135-1140 (2010).
99. Sampaio, E. V. S. B., Araújo, M. S. B. & Sampaio, Y. Propensão à desertificação no semi-árido brasileiro. Rev. Geogr. 22, 67-80 (2005).
100. Aprova o Zoneamento Agroecológico da Cana-de-açúcar e Determina ao Conselho Monetário Nacional o Estabelecimento de Normas para as Operações de Financiamento ao Setor Sucroalcooleiro, nos Termos do Zoneamento Federal Decree 6.961/2009 (Government of Brazil, 2009).